LAITON ROKOTE AIHEUTTI PERSIANLAHDEN SYNDROOMAN

Guardian:

"The illness known as Gulf war syndrome looks likely to have been caused by an illegal vaccine "booster" given by the Ministry of Defence to protect soldiers against biological weapons, according to the results of a new series of tests. Scientists in the United States found that symptoms of the illness were the same for service personnel who received the injections whether or not they served in the Gulf.

The common factor for the 275,000 British and US veterans who are ill appears to be a substance called squalene, allegedly used in injections to add to their potency. Such an action would have been illegal. Squalene is not licensed for use on either side of the Atlantic because of potential side effects."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2001/jul/30/internationalnews?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487
3<50
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 3

Vanhimmat

Joo ja tuota samaa skvaleenia käytettiin meidän kuuluisassa pandemrix sikainfluenssarokotteessa.

Äänestä
  • Vaccine A

    "This is a book that the U.S. Department of Defense does not want you to read. It is about human medical experimentation—not that undertaken by the Japanese and Nazi doctors of World War II more than sixty years ago, but human experimentation being conducted on U.S. citizens by U.S. doctors and scientists working for the U.S. military."

    "This marker identifies whether a GI had been injected with a substance called "squalene" (pronounced SKWAY-leen). Those who had a so-called Gulf War illness consistently tested positive for antibodies to squalene in their blood; healthy Gulf War veterans do not have these antibodies. The Tulane scientists then tested their next hypothesis—that squalene had been introduced into these veterans through the anthrax vaccine the veterans had been given. The licensed anthrax vaccine, they knew, did not contain squalene, which explains why hundreds of thousands of soldiers did not get sick."

    http://www.vaccine-a.com/intro.html

    Äänestä

  • Silent War kirjoitti:

    Vaccine A

    "This is a book that the U.S. Department of Defense does not want you to read. It is about human medical experimentation—not that undertaken by the Japanese and Nazi doctors of World War II more than sixty years ago, but human experimentation being conducted on U.S. citizens by U.S. doctors and scientists working for the U.S. military."

    "This marker identifies whether a GI had been injected with a substance called "squalene" (pronounced SKWAY-leen). Those who had a so-called Gulf War illness consistently tested positive for antibodies to squalene in their blood; healthy Gulf War veterans do not have these antibodies. The Tulane scientists then tested their next hypothesis—that squalene had been introduced into these veterans through the anthrax vaccine the veterans had been given. The licensed anthrax vaccine, they knew, did not contain squalene, which explains why hundreds of thousands of soldiers did not get sick."

    http://www.vaccine-a.com/intro.html

    Herää kysymys saako skvaleenilla terästetty rokote aikaan puolustusreaktion elimistön omaa skvaleenia vastaan? Eli johtuuko tästä sikarokotteesta ilmenneet ongelmat ja jenkkisolttujen persisianlahdensodan syndrooma??

    Olkaapa ylpeitä jos otitte rokotteen vastaan. Saitte olla testinukkeja sotateollisuudelle.

    Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


Vaikutus alkanut... kirjoitti:

Guardian:

"The illness known as Gulf war syndrome looks likely to have been caused by an illegal vaccine "booster" given by the Ministry of Defence to protect soldiers against biological weapons, according to the results of a new series of tests. Scientists in the United States found that symptoms of the illness were the same for service personnel who received the injections whether or not they served in the Gulf.

The common factor for the 275,000 British and US veterans who are ill appears to be a substance called squalene, allegedly used in injections to add to their potency. Such an action would have been illegal. Squalene is not licensed for use on either side of the Atlantic because of potential side effects."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2001/jul/30/internationalnews?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu