wedge strategiasta

On tainnut lässähtää melko täydellisesti:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy

Lainaa:

"Future

Speaking in October 2002 the Discovery Institute's William Dembski said,

the wedge metaphor has outlived its usefulness. Indeed, with ID critics like Barbara Forrest and Paul Gross writing books like Evolution and the Wedge of Intelligent Design: The Trojan Horse Strategy, the wedge metaphor has even become a liability. To be sure, our critics will attempt to keep throwing the wedge metaphor (and especially the notorious wedge document) in our face. But the wedge needs to be seen as a propaedeutic — as an anticipation of and preparation for a positive, design-theoretic research program that invigorates science and renews culture.[52]

Critics have commented that

it's a strange scientific revolution that seeks to establish its position in secondary school curricula before the research itself has been accomplished. But this obvious impediment is removed if the revolution is based on a redefinition of science rather than on new research.[53]"

Ja tuo oli jo n. 9 v. sitten. Mädän haju alkaa jo hajota.

Discovery Institute asetti dokumentissaan selkeän kahdenkymmenen vuoden mittaisen kampanjatavoitteen (1999):

"Tehdä suunnitteluteoriaasta vallitseva filosofia, ajatus- ja toimintamalli tieteessä"

"Nähdä suunnitteluteoriaa sovellettavan eri tieteenaloilla kuten fysiikassa, kemiassa, palentologiassa ja filosofiassa"

20:sta 13 vuotta on jo mennyt, onko näistä tavoitteista yksikään toteutunut lähimainkaan?