mitä mieltä w. bushista

I was watching TV Ontario, it is similar to our Public Television, and there was a program on corporations. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations can be considered persons. The program listed six areas as a checklist to determine whether or not a corporation displays a mental disorder. The same checklist can be applied to people, Bush II and Cheney. Here is the checklist with some examples for the checklist. You may want to fill in more examples from the information that you have. 1. callousness toward people (Bush II's handling of staff members and the fact that he is more interested in his base of the haves and have mores) 2. impersonal relationships toward people (Bush II way and only his way, you are with us or you are against us) 3. disregard for the safety of others (deregulation of environmental standards and the lowering of health care benefits) 4. deceitfulness (do you honestly need examples for number four, Bush's three and a half years have been deceitful) 5. incapacity to experience guilt (Bush II is never at fault, it is someone else's fault, Bush II can never accept blame) 6. failure to comply toward social norms to benefit people (Bush II is only concerned about hos base of the haves and the have mores and his dealings with foreign countries is a total disaster) It is my perceptual opinion with the use from this checklist that Bush II and Cheney are unfit to be president and vice-president respectively because they display a mental disorder. I end by saying may God have mercy on America!

Ihan ok. Jatkokaudelle vain. Paras vaihtoehto USA:n presidentiksi.

http://www.bushisantichrist.com/
http://www.konformist.com/2000/bushjr666.htm
http://www.falloutshelternews.com/BushHitlerLinks.html

ruudinkeksijä mutta huonompiakin vaihtoehtoja on olemassa.

Mihin asiaan tuo John Kerry liittyy?

Neljä vuotta sitten toivoin, että Al Gore voittaisi presidentinvaalit. En ole koskaan oikein hyväksynyt George W. Bushia. Näissä vaaleissa olen kuitenkin aivan ymmälläni: missä viipyy asiallinen kritiikki Bushia kohtaan. Arvosteluhalukkuutta kyllä on, mutta tuloksena on vain aivotonta sättimistä. Eikö todellista arvosteltavaa olekaan? Bushin vastustajien tulisi osoittaa että Kerry olisi parempi presidentti. Miksei Kerryn ansioita tuoda esiin. Tästäkö johtuvat nykyiset tiedot, ettö Bushin kannatusluku on 51 % ja Kerryn selvästi alhaisempi.

http://www.funsnap.com/1/bushgirl.swf

Ei jätkällä paljon järki päätä pakota. Kyllä pitäisi USA:n presidentillä olla vähän enemmän yleissivistystä ja loogista ajattelukykyä.