Oliko historiallinen Jeesus sittenkin parrakas nainen?

Suurin osa kirkossa veisaavista on naisia. Yhä suurempi osa papeistakin on naisia.

Torinon käärinlina on aito, vaikka virheellisesti ensin vääräksi todistettinkin. Näkyykö siinä rintoja?

Ei näy.

Revelation 1:13, in the King James Version, says, “And I saw in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle”. “Paps” is the archaic word for a woman’s breasts. In the Greek, the word used is the plural mastos, which the lexicon defines as “the breast, esp., of the swelling breast of a woman”. Rarely, the plural was used to refer to a man’s breasts, but the prevailing sense is female. The fact that the figure in this passage from Revelation wore a “girdle”, or cincture, about the breasts—the modern equivalent would be a brassiere—confirms that the breasts in question are female.
Indeed, the New English Bible translates the plural as though it were a singular—“with a golden girdle round his breast”. The New Revised Standard Version tried to avoid any embarrassment by wrongly translating it as “chest”. (The Pagan Christ, p. 211)

It is interesting to note that Revelations also contains a passage that speaks of angels having breasts!
And the seven angels came out of the temple, having the seven plagues, clothed in pure and white linen, and having their breasts (stethos) girded with golden girdles. (Revelations 15:6)
Do angels have breasts? The passage doesn’t use the Greek word “mastos”, so the author is simply describing the breasts (non-female) of angels. Yet the verse Revelation 1:13 blatantly describes Jesus as a woman.

Eihän kirkko voisi hyväksyä, että Jeesus olisi nainen.
Noihin aikoihin miehillä oli suuri valta.
Niin tai näin, käännös virheistä tässä kysytään.
Mitäpä väliä sukupuolella olisi? Kirkolle ja uskoville se olisi katastrofi.
Onhan Jeesuksesta tehty maalaus jo hänen syntymästään lähtien, ja Jumalakin istunut maalattavana (kuvaraamatut)!