Ei ryssä eikä Assad pommitti sattue.

Aleppon takaisinvaltaaminen on muutamien tuntien asia; Syyrian armeija potkaisee lännen perustamat ja tukemat terroristi ulos Alepposta.
Syyrian armeija otti aamupäivällä 20.09.2016 jälleen hallintaansa Etelä-Aleppon laitamat Venäjän ilmavoimien tuella.
Syyrian armeija on ottanut uudelleen hallintaansa Al-Shqaifin alueen Etelä-Aleppon laitamilla. Terroristien Al-Nusra rintama oli aiemmin työntänyt armeijan pois alueelta.
Syyrian hallituksen joukot Venäjän ilmavoimien tukemana torjuivat Al-Nutra terroristien hyökkäyksen Al-Shqaifin pohjoisella alueella Aleppossa,
Yhteenottojen aikana tuhottiin terroristien neljä taisteluajoneuvoa, seitsemän raskailla konekivääreillä varustettuja ajoneuvoja ja nitisti 40 terroristia.

Syria back: In a matter of hours, the SyrianArmy kicked militants back out of Aleppo.

Syrian Army Regains Control Over South Aleppo Outskirts With Russian Air Cover

MIDDLE EAST 09:21 20.09.2016(updated 12:49 20.09.2016)
The Syrian Army has regained control over the southern outskirts of the Al-Shqaif district in Aleppo. Earlier, al-Nusra Front terrorists had pushed the army out of the area. HMEIMIM (Sputnik) – Syrian government troops with Russian Aerospace Forces backing repelled a terrorist attack in the Al-Shqaif district of northern Aleppo, the Russian reconciliation center for the opposing parties said Tuesday. "As a result of heavy fighting, Syrian government forces backed by the Russian Aerospace Forces repelled a terrorist attack in the Al-Shqaif district on the northern outskirts and regained control of the southern outskirts of Al-Shqaif on the morning of September 20," the center said. Earlier, al-Nusra Front terrorists had pushed the army out of the area. “During clashes, the Syrian army destroyed four infantry fighting vehicles, seven pickups with heavy machine guns and up to 40 militants,” the center said in a statement.

Read more: https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160920/1045492376/syrian-army-shqaif-control.html

Hetkinen.. pahv..i! Pahvi. Se se on. Niin, siis hautapahviin. Hitto ku lipsahti. Joku voi vielä ymmärtää väärin. Hitto.

Kenttäraportti: Syyrian armeija etenee itäisessä Ghoutassa.
Field Report: Syrian Army advances in Eastern Ghouta
https://aml.ink/3wGKX

Syyrian hallituksen joukot etenivät tänään syvälle lännen perustamien ja tukemien terroristikapinallisten hallussa olevalla Itä -Ghoutan alueella kiristäen näin hirttosilmukkaa terroristikapinallisten pitkäaikaisessa hallussa olevan Douman kaupungin ympärillä.

Kymmeniä terroristimilitantteja kuoli hyökkäyksessä.

Syrian government forces made today a significant advance deep in the rebel-held Eastern Ghouta region, thus tightening the noose around the longtime insurgent-held city of Douma.

The Syrian Army blitzed the southwestern part of the Signal Army Base (located less than 1 km to the northwest of Hawsh Nasri), and eventually imposed full control on the base and the affiliated warehouses.

Scores of militants were killed in the attack.

Hyvä uutinen!

Rotshildin kaasuputkea ei sitten rakenneta kun sen terroristit nitistetään viimeiseen jihadistiin.

"Ainut osapuoli joka mahdollisesti hyötyy tästä pommituksesta. On Turkki."

Tai Assadin armeija! Pommituksilla estettiin avun saanti kapinallisten puolen alueella asuville siviileille!

Ookkonääpöljä kirjoitti:

"Ainut osapuoli joka mahdollisesti hyötyy tästä pommituksesta. On Turkki."

Tai Assadin armeija! Pommituksilla estettiin avun saanti kapinallisten puolen alueella asuville siviileille!

Juuri tulleen kansainvälisen teidotteen mukaan. Kone oli tullut Turkin ilmatilasta alueelle.

Eli sepitit juuri kv. tiedon, jota et "jostakin syystä" osaa referoida!? Oli varmaan kuulu kv Sputniknews?

UAV lennokin ottama videomateriaali paljastaa uusia yksityiskohtia miten lännen perustamat ja tukemat terroristit kuljettivat YK:n avustussaattueen suojassa kevyen kuorma-auton vetämänä raskaan kranaatinheittimen osia Aleppossa piiritettyinä oleville terroristijoukkioille.
Venäjän puolustusministeriö kiistää Venäjän ja Syyrian suihkukoneiden ilmaiskut avutussaattueisiin.
Videokuvien tarkastelu ei osoita mitään merkkejä ilmaiskuista YK:n tukemiin avustussaattueisiin.
Lännen tukemien terroristien "White Helmets" järjestön jäsen,jolla on yhteyksiä Al-Nustran terroristirintamaan oli kameroineen "vahingossa"ollut oikeaan aikaan oikeassa paikassa kuvaamassa ammusten iskujen aiheuttamia tuhoja avustussaattueissa.

LÄHI-ITÄ 20:21 20.9.2016 (päivitetty 20:53 20.9.2016)
AFP 2016 / OMAR HAJ KADOUR

Virallisten tietojen mukaan lännen tukema Al-Nusra -rintaman terroristiryhmä suoritti tykistönhyökkäyksen Aleppon lounaisella esikaupunkialueella.

Russian MoD Releases Footage of Attacked UN Aid Convoy in Syria's Aleppo (VIDEO) © AFP 2016/ Omar haj kadour

MIDDLE EAST 20:21 20.09.2016(updated 20:53 20.09.2016) Get short URL 54158071152 The Russian military unveiled on Tuesday video footage of a UN humanitarian aid convoy that came under attack in Syria, which shows a militants' pickup vehicle carrying a large-caliber mortar as part of the convoy. The video shows that the UN aid convoy was accompanied by a terrorists' off-road vehicle with a large-caliber mortar launcher, the Russian Defense Ministry spokesman said. "The examination of the video footage made via drones of the movement of the humanitarian convoy in areas controlled by militants in the province of Aleppo has revealed new details. The video clearly shows how terrorists are redeploying a pickup with a large-caliber mortar on it using the convoy as a cover," Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said. He said that "it is unclear yet who accompanies whom: the [pickup with a] mortar accompanies the convoy with "White Helmets" volunteers or vise versa. And most importantly, where did the mortar disappear near the destination point of the convoy and what was the target of its fire during the convoy's stop and unloading?" On Monday, the United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said that the aid convoy crossed the conflict line in the Big Orem area of the Syrian city of Aleppo.

"Venäjän puolustusministeriö kiistää Venäjän ja Syyrian suihkukoneiden ilmaiskut avutussaattueisiin."

USKOTKO ITSE aikuisen oikeasti, että se MYÖNTÄISI iskut, jos olisi ne tehnyt?

Tuollaista sinisilmäisyyttä tapaa harvoin! Eniten pommituksista 'hyötyy' Assadin armeija! Pommituksilla estettiin avun saanti kapinallisten puolen alueella asuville siviileille!

Predator on yhdysvaltalainen suurikokoisen sotilaallisen lennokin, sen ohjauksen ja satelliittitietoliikenteen sekä sen keräämän tiedon ja asejärjestelmien käytön muodostama järjestelmä.
Tämä suurikokoinen lennokki havaittiin 3600 metrin korkeudessa ennen Aleppon avustussaattueeseen kohdistunutta hyökkäystä.
Predado drone sotilaallinen lennokki oli lähtenyt 19.syyskuuta klo 19.00 illalla Incirklin sotilastukikohdasta Turkista ja lensi 200 km:n vauhdilla .

Predator drone spotted before Aleppo aid convoy attack: Russian MoD
By News Desk - 21/09/20163

(TASS) A predator drone capable of hitting targets on the ground was registered in the area where the UN humanitarian convoy came under attack in northern Aleppo on the evening of September 19th, the Spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Igor Konashenkov, said on Wednesday.

"The Russian Defense Ministry has at its disposal, objective air situation monitoring data gathered on the evening of September 19th, when the humanitarian convoy was attacked," Konashenkov added.

"On the evening of September 19th, an attack drone belonging to the international coalition was registered in that area at an altitude of 3600 meters."


"It was flying at a speed of about 200 kilometers per hour. The drone had taken off from Turkey’s Incirlik air base. Our air situation monitoring means identified the drone as a Predator," Konashenkov said.

Miten länsimedia vääristelee Syyrian avustussaattueeseen kohdistunutta hyökkäystä.
Making up the news: How the Western media misreported the Syrian convoy attack.
By ALEXANDER MERCOURIS
Instead of making a real effort to find out the truth of what actually happened to the Syrian aid convoy the Western media preferred to repeat whatever the US and the Jihadis told them as if it was true.
19Share on FacebookTwitter
The story of the attack on the humanitarian convoy in Syria is a case study in the collapse of journalistic standards and ethics.
I do not know who attacked the convoy in northern Aleppo. However I note that the Syrians and the Russians have publicly and categorically denied having done so.
By contrast the US has stopped short of publicly identifying either the Syrians or the Russians as the perpetrators of the attack on the convoy, though they have said that it was attacked in an air strike and that only the air forces of one or other of these countries must have done it. They have also said that the Russians bear “responsibility” for the attack on the convoy, even if it was the Syrians rather than the Russians who did it.
Instead of the US publicly identifying who they say attacked the convoy, two US officials are doing so anonymously, in comments to the BBC and Reuters, spreading a story of two Russian SU24 fighter bombers supposedly being seen in the air (by whom?) in the area of the convoy. These same two unnamed US officials are also claiming that the attack on the convoy was revenge for the US air strike on the Syrian troops defending Deir Ezzor.
Given the choice between straightforward public and categorical statements of denial from the Syrians and the Russians, and elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of Russian guilt from the US, the Western media without hesitation preferred the elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of Russian guilt from the US. As a result it was reporting all of yesterday as fact that it was the Russian air force which attacked the convoy.
This is the reverse of what responsible journalism would do. It should hardly need saying that a straightforward public denial ought always to carry more weight than elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of guilt.
It is not after all as if those making the elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of guilt do not have a bad track record of giving wrong and misleading information, which ought in itself to be a reason to doubt that what they say is true. The US has a record of feeding the media false information extending all the way back to the Gulf of Tonkin incident and beyond. Moreover the mere fact the two US officials spoke to the media on condition of anonymity was itself manipulative and ought immediately to have raises health warnings about the truth of what they were saying.
To compound the problem the evidence of what happened is being provided by a group called the White Helmets, whose record shows them to be sympathetic to the Syrian opposition, and local “activists” whose video of the incident – complete with slogans of “Allahu Akbar” – shows them to be Sunni Jihadist militants.
As to that evidence, the Russians have cast doubt on what it shows. Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Igor Konashenkov is reported to have said
“We carefully studied the video recordings of the so-called activists from the scene and found no signs that any munitions hit the convoy”.
According to Konashenkov, the vehicles show no destruction by the burst wave as would be the case from an air-delivered munition. Moreover
“Everything shown on the video is the direct consequence that the cargo caught fire and this began in a strange way simultaneously with carrying out a massive offensive of militants in Aleppo,”
As my colleague Alex Christoforou has pointed out, the Russians are also claiming that Jihadi fighters were spotted by their drones accompanying the convoy. Here is Konashenkov again
“Analysis of video records from drones of yesterday’s movement of the humanitarian convoy across Aleppo’s territories controlled by militants has revealed new details. It is clearly seen in the video that a terrorists’ pickup truck with a towed large-caliber mortar is moving along with the convoy.
It is not clear who is covering home: either the mortar is covering the convoy with the White Helmets volunteers or vise versa. And the most important question: where this mortar had disappeared when the convoy reached its destination and where it was targeting fire at when the convoy was being unloaded.”
This is the broadest of hints that the likeliest explanation for the destruction of the convoy was that it was either caught in the crossfire between the Syrian military and the Jihadis as the ceasefire in the area broke down, or that it was intentionally destroyed by the Jihadis themselves, presumably as some sort of “false flag” operation.

Etulinja kirjoitti:

Miten länsimedia vääristelee Syyrian avustussaattueeseen kohdistunutta hyökkäystä.
Making up the news: How the Western media misreported the Syrian convoy attack.
By ALEXANDER MERCOURIS
Instead of making a real effort to find out the truth of what actually happened to the Syrian aid convoy the Western media preferred to repeat whatever the US and the Jihadis told them as if it was true.
19Share on FacebookTwitter
The story of the attack on the humanitarian convoy in Syria is a case study in the collapse of journalistic standards and ethics.
I do not know who attacked the convoy in northern Aleppo. However I note that the Syrians and the Russians have publicly and categorically denied having done so.
By contrast the US has stopped short of publicly identifying either the Syrians or the Russians as the perpetrators of the attack on the convoy, though they have said that it was attacked in an air strike and that only the air forces of one or other of these countries must have done it. They have also said that the Russians bear “responsibility” for the attack on the convoy, even if it was the Syrians rather than the Russians who did it.
Instead of the US publicly identifying who they say attacked the convoy, two US officials are doing so anonymously, in comments to the BBC and Reuters, spreading a story of two Russian SU24 fighter bombers supposedly being seen in the air (by whom?) in the area of the convoy. These same two unnamed US officials are also claiming that the attack on the convoy was revenge for the US air strike on the Syrian troops defending Deir Ezzor.
Given the choice between straightforward public and categorical statements of denial from the Syrians and the Russians, and elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of Russian guilt from the US, the Western media without hesitation preferred the elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of Russian guilt from the US. As a result it was reporting all of yesterday as fact that it was the Russian air force which attacked the convoy.
This is the reverse of what responsible journalism would do. It should hardly need saying that a straightforward public denial ought always to carry more weight than elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of guilt.
It is not after all as if those making the elliptical semi-secret off-the-record insinuations of guilt do not have a bad track record of giving wrong and misleading information, which ought in itself to be a reason to doubt that what they say is true. The US has a record of feeding the media false information extending all the way back to the Gulf of Tonkin incident and beyond. Moreover the mere fact the two US officials spoke to the media on condition of anonymity was itself manipulative and ought immediately to have raises health warnings about the truth of what they were saying.
To compound the problem the evidence of what happened is being provided by a group called the White Helmets, whose record shows them to be sympathetic to the Syrian opposition, and local “activists” whose video of the incident – complete with slogans of “Allahu Akbar” – shows them to be Sunni Jihadist militants.
As to that evidence, the Russians have cast doubt on what it shows. Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Igor Konashenkov is reported to have said
“We carefully studied the video recordings of the so-called activists from the scene and found no signs that any munitions hit the convoy”.
According to Konashenkov, the vehicles show no destruction by the burst wave as would be the case from an air-delivered munition. Moreover
“Everything shown on the video is the direct consequence that the cargo caught fire and this began in a strange way simultaneously with carrying out a massive offensive of militants in Aleppo,”
As my colleague Alex Christoforou has pointed out, the Russians are also claiming that Jihadi fighters were spotted by their drones accompanying the convoy. Here is Konashenkov again
“Analysis of video records from drones of yesterday’s movement of the humanitarian convoy across Aleppo’s territories controlled by militants has revealed new details. It is clearly seen in the video that a terrorists’ pickup truck with a towed large-caliber mortar is moving along with the convoy.
It is not clear who is covering home: either the mortar is covering the convoy with the White Helmets volunteers or vise versa. And the most important question: where this mortar had disappeared when the convoy reached its destination and where it was targeting fire at when the convoy was being unloaded.”
This is the broadest of hints that the likeliest explanation for the destruction of the convoy was that it was either caught in the crossfire between the Syrian military and the Jihadis as the ceasefire in the area broke down, or that it was intentionally destroyed by the Jihadis themselves, presumably as some sort of “false flag” operation.

Given the way the Jihadis have conducted themselves during the Syrian conflict, the latter is neither a wild nor an outlandish theory. No less an official than Harald Kujat, former chairman of the NATO Military Committee and former Chief of Staff of the German Armed Forces, is reported by TASS to have told Germany’s N-TV channel

“I cannot imagine that Russia wanted to torpedo its agreements with the United States by this attack” [Kujat said, adding that he did not believe that] “Syria’s authorities would bomb a convoy of the Syrian humanitarian organization, the Syrian Red Crescent.
So we have only terrorists who absolutely do not want the US and Russia to unite their military efforts in line with the agreements and act together against them. But there is no proof so far, an investigation on the scene is needed for this. All we hear now is just speculation. It should be noted that starting from yesterday the UN has been talking about just an attack rather than attack from the air as they cannot prove this was bombing.”
(bold italics added)

Possibly as a result of Kujat’s comments the German government is stepping out of line with the US, and is refusing either to call the attack on the convoy a “bombardment” or to say that the Russians were responsible.

Once upon a time this situation would not have arisen. Not so long ago the big Western media agencies – not just the news agencies but also the big newspapers and the TV stations – employed armies of field reporters. Following an incident of this sort they would have rushed to the scene to find out what had actually happened. It would have taken no time at all for them to confirm whether the convoy really was attacked in an air strike or whether the absence of bomb craters and other tell-tale signs of an air strike showed that it had been attacked or destroyed in some other way.

I can remember for example how in 1991 during the first Gulf War the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen visited a bunker destroyed in an air strike in Baghdad with heavy civilian loss of life and effortlessly demolished Western military claims that the bunker was a command post.

Of course if the Jihadis in control of the area where the convoy was destroyed were not prepared to allow reporters to visit the area to find out what had happened, that would have been a news story in itself. Not so long ago the BBC, following an incident of this sort – if its reporters were not able to visit the scene – would have impartially reported the allegations and counter-allegations, and have said that it could not confirm them.

This simply doesn’t happen any more. The big Western media agencies no longer employ the armies of field reporters they once did, and the few they still do seem in many cases to be little better than hired guns, sent to the scene not to report what actually happened but to give on-the-spot corroboration to the line already taken in the editorial office, which seems invariably to be the line taken by Western governments.

In the case of the attack on the convoy no attempt to visit the scene of the attack seems to have been made at all, making it easy for both the US and the Jihadis on the spot to manipulate the media and control the story, so that it is reported in the way the media already wants.

That unfortunately is what happens when a media becomes more interested in promoting a narrative than in reporting the truth.

Etulinja kirjoitti:

Predator on yhdysvaltalainen suurikokoisen sotilaallisen lennokin, sen ohjauksen ja satelliittitietoliikenteen sekä sen keräämän tiedon ja asejärjestelmien käytön muodostama järjestelmä.
Tämä suurikokoinen lennokki havaittiin 3600 metrin korkeudessa ennen Aleppon avustussaattueeseen kohdistunutta hyökkäystä.
Predado drone sotilaallinen lennokki oli lähtenyt 19.syyskuuta klo 19.00 illalla Incirklin sotilastukikohdasta Turkista ja lensi 200 km:n vauhdilla .

Predator drone spotted before Aleppo aid convoy attack: Russian MoD
By News Desk - 21/09/20163

(TASS) A predator drone capable of hitting targets on the ground was registered in the area where the UN humanitarian convoy came under attack in northern Aleppo on the evening of September 19th, the Spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry, Igor Konashenkov, said on Wednesday.

"The Russian Defense Ministry has at its disposal, objective air situation monitoring data gathered on the evening of September 19th, when the humanitarian convoy was attacked," Konashenkov added.

"On the evening of September 19th, an attack drone belonging to the international coalition was registered in that area at an altitude of 3600 meters."


"It was flying at a speed of about 200 kilometers per hour. The drone had taken off from Turkey’s Incirlik air base. Our air situation monitoring means identified the drone as a Predator," Konashenkov said.

Predator eikä Venäjän kehuttu ihmehävittäjälaivue tai S-400 -ohjukset mahtaneet yhtään mitään..?

Syyrian rannikkovesilla asemissa olevat Venäjän sota-alukset tuhosivat 22.09.2016 kolmella ohjusiskulla 30 Israelin,Yhdysvaltojen,Britanian, Saudi-Arabian,Turkin ja Qatarin upseeria,jotka ohjasivat huoneestaan terroristien iskuja Aleppossa ja Idlibissa.
Syyrian armeijan tykistöyksiköt nitistivät ja haavoittivat kymmeniä lännen tukemia terroristeja terroristien kokoamiskeskuksiiin kohdistetuilla iskuilla lähellä Castelloa ja Mallahin farmeilla Zahrassa, Abdo Rabbaan Kafar Hamrassa ja
Hurayatynissa.
Syyrian ilmavoimat iskivät terroristien huoltoreitille Pohjois -Aleppossa ja murskasi terroristien saattueita alueilla al-Aratab, Üröm Kobra ja Ma'ara al- Artiq ja pakottivat monet terroristit pakenemaan kohti Turkkia.
Syyrian armeija on jatkanut etenemistä Aleppo ja on ottanut takaisin hallintaansa useita strategisia alueita Khan Toumanin kaupungissa.

Russia Destroys Secret Foreign Military Operations Room Killing Israeli, American And British Intelligence Officers In Syria !
on: September 22, 2016
The Russian warships stationed in Syria’s coastal waters targeted and destroyed a foreign military operations room, killing over two dozen Israeli and western intelligence officers.
“The Russian warships fired three Caliber missiles at the foreign officers’ coordination operations room in Dar Ezza region in the Western part of Aleppo near Sam’an mountain, killing 30 Israeli and western officers,” the Arabic-language service of Russia’s Sputnik news agency quoted battlefield source in Aleppo as saying on Wednesday.
The operations room was located in the Western part of Aleppo province in the middle of sky-high Sam’an mountain and old caves. The region is deep into a chain of mountains.
Several US, Turkish, Saudi, Qatari and British officers were also killed along with the Israeli officers. The foreign officers who were killed in the Aleppo operations room were directing the terrorists’ attacks in Aleppo and Idlib.
Earlier in September, the Syrian army units launched a preemptive strike on the terrorists of the so-called Aleppo Operations Room in their gathering centers near Castello road in the Northern areas of Aleppo and Mallah farms, foiling their plots to attack the region’s supply route, a source said.
The source said that the army’s artillery units attacked the terrorists’ gathering centers near Castello and Mallah farms in Zahra Abdo Rabbah, Kafar Hamra and Hurayatyn which killed and wounded dozens of militants.
Also, the Syrian air force attacked the terrorists’ supply route in Northern Aleppo towards Hayyan and Adnan as well as the supply roads in Western Aleppo towards the North and smashed the terrorists’ convoys in al-Aratab, Urom Kobra and Ma’ara al-Artiq which thwarted the terrorists’ plots and forced many of them flee towards the Turkish borders.
Informed media sources disclosed earlier that the Syrian army has continued its advances in the Southern part of Aleppo, and regained control over several strategic areas in the town of Khan Touman.
“A number of key warehouses of Khan Touman are now under the Syrian army’s control,” the Arabic-language media quoted an unnamed informed source as saying.
The source noted that the Syrian air force and army’s artillery units also targeted the gathering centers and fortifications of the terrorists in Khan Touman