Kyllä se on vasemmistolaiset niin, että nää teidän "huippupoliitikkonne"

Näihän se on, kun on SDP:n ÄäriVasemmisto ja MyrkynVihreät päättämässä -
Eivätkä tiedä mitään Valtiontalouden hoidosta ! - Siis Eivät HöykäsenPöläystä !
VelkaTaakan ne on saaneet aikaiseksi; Ja Kansan pistävät MaksuMieheksi !
Jos tuommose Tumpelot vielä saa jatkaa, niin Suomi menee Konkurssiin !

Demarit ovat tottuneet fattaan.

Anonyymi00007 kirjoitti:

Demarit ovat tottuneet fattaan.

Lue: Persuporvarit ovat tottuneet fattaan.

Anonyymi00002 kirjoitti:

Näihän se on, kun on SDP:n ÄäriVasemmisto ja MyrkynVihreät päättämässä -
Eivätkä tiedä mitään Valtiontalouden hoidosta ! - Siis Eivät HöykäsenPöläystä !
VelkaTaakan ne on saaneet aikaiseksi; Ja Kansan pistävät MaksuMieheksi !
Jos tuommose Tumpelot vielä saa jatkaa, niin Suomi menee Konkurssiin !

Huutelee persuporvari jolta aamualääkkeet jäi taas kerran ottamatta.

Sinäkö muka tajuat? Hah hah hah hah hah hah hah...

Kaikki liiketoiminta on vasemistolla mennet konkurssiin 90 luvulla ,panki,rakenust ,elintarvike ,vakuutus ,eläkel ja paljon muuta on mennyt konkursiin kun ei ole järkeä johtamaan taloutta ,niin miten sitten pystyttäis valtion taloutta tervehtyttämään .

Anonyymi00024 kirjoitti:

Kaikki liiketoiminta on vasemistolla mennet konkurssiin 90 luvulla ,panki,rakenust ,elintarvike ,vakuutus ,eläkel ja paljon muuta on mennyt konkursiin kun ei ole järkeä johtamaan taloutta ,niin miten sitten pystyttäis valtion taloutta tervehtyttämään .

KOKOOMUS-KEPU-PORVARIT vei valtiolta kansan rahoja suoraan yli 100 000 miljoonaa= 100 miljardia-

porvarien tekemän kaivoslain menetykset on sitä luokaa että Suomi olisi rikkaampi kuin Norja jos porvarit ei olisi olleet Suomen politiikassa ollenkaan.

Mm. Kittilässä ja Lapissa maailman suurimat kultavarannot-

ei ihme että USA on ottamassa Suomen haltuunsa Venäjän kanssa.

Anonyymi00025 kirjoitti:

KOKOOMUS-KEPU-PORVARIT vei valtiolta kansan rahoja suoraan yli 100 000 miljoonaa= 100 miljardia-

porvarien tekemän kaivoslain menetykset on sitä luokaa että Suomi olisi rikkaampi kuin Norja jos porvarit ei olisi olleet Suomen politiikassa ollenkaan.

Mm. Kittilässä ja Lapissa maailman suurimat kultavarannot-

ei ihme että USA on ottamassa Suomen haltuunsa Venäjän kanssa.

Venäjä ei ole kiinnostunut Suomen varannoista HEILLÄ kun on itselläkin loputtomat luonnonvarat- vaan hyvinvoinnista ja laadukkaasta rauhallisesta elämästä täällä- sijoittavat asuntoihin täällä.

9 miljardi yritystukee velkaralla kelpaa kyllä kokomukselle aina ävoisko leika kokonaan pois miski rikaat voitolliset yrityket tarvii sosiaalietuutta mutta kpyhölle i suoda ruokaan

Anonyymi00007 kirjoitti:

Demarit ovat tottuneet fattaan.

Yritystuki on myös sosiaalietuut vai tai taivasstakis ne raht tulee

9 miljardii velkaraa rikille sosiaalietuutena jika buosi ja ei edes alv veroa kuin sinulle duunari

Anonyymi00025 kirjoitti:

KOKOOMUS-KEPU-PORVARIT vei valtiolta kansan rahoja suoraan yli 100 000 miljoonaa= 100 miljardia-

porvarien tekemän kaivoslain menetykset on sitä luokaa että Suomi olisi rikkaampi kuin Norja jos porvarit ei olisi olleet Suomen politiikassa ollenkaan.

Mm. Kittilässä ja Lapissa maailman suurimat kultavarannot-

ei ihme että USA on ottamassa Suomen haltuunsa Venäjän kanssa.

Totta porvarit on suomen syöpä

Korona aikana porvarit ruikutti sosiaalietuutta joka päivä jos musitaa

Anonyymi00014 kirjoitti:

Lue: Persuporvarit ovat tottuneet fattaan.

Sinä punikki elät kelan tuilla....hohohohohohoo.

Anonyymi00029 kirjoitti:

Totta porvarit on suomen syöpä

Te punigit sitä olette, aloititte kapinankin 1918.

Porvarien "taloudenhoito" jätti tälle nykyiselle hallituspohjalle 106 400 000 000 euroa valtionvelkaa miljardien eurojen korkomenoilla. Vastuullista?

Vassut on hukanneet itsensä. No, Sahra opettaa. Milloinkahan saataisiin tuollainen Suomeenkin.

"I am against this sort of insane drunkenness about war that all the other parties celebrate. Arms deliveries, tank deliveries; it's critical that more resistance emerges; that's a very important issue for me. And then there are the social and economic issues in Germany. The economic sanctions [against Russia] in particular are hurting the economy and people in Germany; everything has become much more expensive. These are the issues that are currently moving a lot of people here."

"In recent years, the Greens have become more and more aggressive. Today, they are the worst war party we have in Germany."

Kattokaa nyt vaikka viher-ahoa.

"I think this is an important aspect: Tanks are now rolling into Ukraine to shoot at Russian soldiers. It will undoubtedly reawaken deep traumas in Russia. Nazi Germany's war of extermination against Russia happened 80 years ago, but it has not been forgotten"

"Our policy is only following the United States. The United States is the only one that benefits from this war."

Kun saisi suomen "patriootit" ymmärtämään tuon.

"In the past, the left has always been concerned with ordinary people who have low incomes and limited access to education. In this context, the left was also against war, not least because poorer people were often the victims—the people who were sent to war."

"Today, the left, i.e., the Left Party, the Greens, and the SPD in Germany, is supported by an academic urban milieu that is relatively privileged. These people are predominantly from well-off academic households. They have a good education and were politicized not so much over the social question or the peace question but over questions of ecology, climate change, and anti-racism—although even that is defined differently today.

Of course, the rejection of racism is an elementary component of left identity. But it has given way to identity politics. Identity politics is not about equality; it promotes privilege and separatism. What someone says is no longer important, but rather who says it. A rather divisive ideology, a stigmatizing ideology. The left today is no longer characterized by political-economic issues or socio-economic issues, but by moral issues. Everything is moralized. "

"This moral impetus—in German, we have the word “Gesinnungsethik”, meaning when someone doesn't consider the consequences of one's actions but always wants to be morally good—is absolutely susceptible to the narrative that is now being used to popularize the war. It says we are the good guys; we represent good values, and that's why we have to stand with Ukraine, because Ukraine stands for the good, for democracy, and for good values. That's a mendacious narrative, but it's catchy for people who approach politics in such a moralizing way. I notice that very clearly.

The leftist discourse supports the narrative that Putin is the bad guy, the aggressor, and we, in the West, are the good guys. But those are double standards."

"Looking at history, it is very clear that this war is not primarily about the question of ethnicity, of Russians against Ukrainians. It is about the question of NATO membership. It is about the question of NATO definitely renouncing possible military bases and missile bases in Ukraine. If the Russians had been assured of that, this war would probably never have broken out. Of course, it also has an internal Ukrainian background. After Maidan, the Russian minority in Ukraine was massively oppressed and attacked. This led to the secession of the Donbas. That question also plays into this whole war. But I think the big and crucial issue is geopolitics. This is about spheres of influence, and the Russians at some point felt they had to put up a stop sign. They want to halt NATO's expansion. I think that is also the only way we can end this war: if people are finally willing to compromise on this issue and signal this to Russia. "

"Right and left are upside down today."

"they no longer see that the left is representing them. There are surveys that say quite clearly that the largest share of AfD voters wants more social balance; we don't want to live in a society where profit rules everything. It's pathetic that we, as the left, allow people who think that way to vote right-wing. It's a mistake of the left in many countries that it doesn't reach these people anymore, and that they go to the right. And if you want to bring these people back, you are accused of being a right-winger. "

https://greenwald.locals.com/post/3451711/sahra-wagenknecht-on-the-ukraine-war-the-state-of-german-politics

Koska joskus on vaan leikattava, ja jos tämä hallitus olisi edes yrittänyt säästää, niin seuraavan hallituksen ei tarvitsisi varmasti tehdä sitten kaikkia leikkauksia joita tulossa on.

Anonyymi00004 kirjoitti:

Vassut on hukanneet itsensä. No, Sahra opettaa. Milloinkahan saataisiin tuollainen Suomeenkin.

"I am against this sort of insane drunkenness about war that all the other parties celebrate. Arms deliveries, tank deliveries; it's critical that more resistance emerges; that's a very important issue for me. And then there are the social and economic issues in Germany. The economic sanctions [against Russia] in particular are hurting the economy and people in Germany; everything has become much more expensive. These are the issues that are currently moving a lot of people here."

"In recent years, the Greens have become more and more aggressive. Today, they are the worst war party we have in Germany."

Kattokaa nyt vaikka viher-ahoa.

"I think this is an important aspect: Tanks are now rolling into Ukraine to shoot at Russian soldiers. It will undoubtedly reawaken deep traumas in Russia. Nazi Germany's war of extermination against Russia happened 80 years ago, but it has not been forgotten"

"Our policy is only following the United States. The United States is the only one that benefits from this war."

Kun saisi suomen "patriootit" ymmärtämään tuon.

"In the past, the left has always been concerned with ordinary people who have low incomes and limited access to education. In this context, the left was also against war, not least because poorer people were often the victims—the people who were sent to war."

"Today, the left, i.e., the Left Party, the Greens, and the SPD in Germany, is supported by an academic urban milieu that is relatively privileged. These people are predominantly from well-off academic households. They have a good education and were politicized not so much over the social question or the peace question but over questions of ecology, climate change, and anti-racism—although even that is defined differently today.

Of course, the rejection of racism is an elementary component of left identity. But it has given way to identity politics. Identity politics is not about equality; it promotes privilege and separatism. What someone says is no longer important, but rather who says it. A rather divisive ideology, a stigmatizing ideology. The left today is no longer characterized by political-economic issues or socio-economic issues, but by moral issues. Everything is moralized. "

"This moral impetus—in German, we have the word “Gesinnungsethik”, meaning when someone doesn't consider the consequences of one's actions but always wants to be morally good—is absolutely susceptible to the narrative that is now being used to popularize the war. It says we are the good guys; we represent good values, and that's why we have to stand with Ukraine, because Ukraine stands for the good, for democracy, and for good values. That's a mendacious narrative, but it's catchy for people who approach politics in such a moralizing way. I notice that very clearly.

The leftist discourse supports the narrative that Putin is the bad guy, the aggressor, and we, in the West, are the good guys. But those are double standards."

"Looking at history, it is very clear that this war is not primarily about the question of ethnicity, of Russians against Ukrainians. It is about the question of NATO membership. It is about the question of NATO definitely renouncing possible military bases and missile bases in Ukraine. If the Russians had been assured of that, this war would probably never have broken out. Of course, it also has an internal Ukrainian background. After Maidan, the Russian minority in Ukraine was massively oppressed and attacked. This led to the secession of the Donbas. That question also plays into this whole war. But I think the big and crucial issue is geopolitics. This is about spheres of influence, and the Russians at some point felt they had to put up a stop sign. They want to halt NATO's expansion. I think that is also the only way we can end this war: if people are finally willing to compromise on this issue and signal this to Russia. "

"Right and left are upside down today."

"they no longer see that the left is representing them. There are surveys that say quite clearly that the largest share of AfD voters wants more social balance; we don't want to live in a society where profit rules everything. It's pathetic that we, as the left, allow people who think that way to vote right-wing. It's a mistake of the left in many countries that it doesn't reach these people anymore, and that they go to the right. And if you want to bring these people back, you are accused of being a right-winger. "

https://greenwald.locals.com/post/3451711/sahra-wagenknecht-on-the-ukraine-war-the-state-of-german-politics

"This is about spheres of influence, and the Russians at some point felt they had to put up a stop sign. They want to halt NATO's expansion. I think that is also the only way we can end this war: if people are finally willing to compromise on this issue and signal this to Russia. "

Niikko 1, viher-aho 0.

Anonyymi00005 kirjoitti:

Koska joskus on vaan leikattava, ja jos tämä hallitus olisi edes yrittänyt säästää, niin seuraavan hallituksen ei tarvitsisi varmasti tehdä sitten kaikkia leikkauksia joita tulossa on.

No mitäs se Andersson sitten oli tekemässä verojen keruulla, jos ei säästää.

Totta.

Just noin se menee porvareilla.

Anonyymi00004 kirjoitti:

Vassut on hukanneet itsensä. No, Sahra opettaa. Milloinkahan saataisiin tuollainen Suomeenkin.

"I am against this sort of insane drunkenness about war that all the other parties celebrate. Arms deliveries, tank deliveries; it's critical that more resistance emerges; that's a very important issue for me. And then there are the social and economic issues in Germany. The economic sanctions [against Russia] in particular are hurting the economy and people in Germany; everything has become much more expensive. These are the issues that are currently moving a lot of people here."

"In recent years, the Greens have become more and more aggressive. Today, they are the worst war party we have in Germany."

Kattokaa nyt vaikka viher-ahoa.

"I think this is an important aspect: Tanks are now rolling into Ukraine to shoot at Russian soldiers. It will undoubtedly reawaken deep traumas in Russia. Nazi Germany's war of extermination against Russia happened 80 years ago, but it has not been forgotten"

"Our policy is only following the United States. The United States is the only one that benefits from this war."

Kun saisi suomen "patriootit" ymmärtämään tuon.

"In the past, the left has always been concerned with ordinary people who have low incomes and limited access to education. In this context, the left was also against war, not least because poorer people were often the victims—the people who were sent to war."

"Today, the left, i.e., the Left Party, the Greens, and the SPD in Germany, is supported by an academic urban milieu that is relatively privileged. These people are predominantly from well-off academic households. They have a good education and were politicized not so much over the social question or the peace question but over questions of ecology, climate change, and anti-racism—although even that is defined differently today.

Of course, the rejection of racism is an elementary component of left identity. But it has given way to identity politics. Identity politics is not about equality; it promotes privilege and separatism. What someone says is no longer important, but rather who says it. A rather divisive ideology, a stigmatizing ideology. The left today is no longer characterized by political-economic issues or socio-economic issues, but by moral issues. Everything is moralized. "

"This moral impetus—in German, we have the word “Gesinnungsethik”, meaning when someone doesn't consider the consequences of one's actions but always wants to be morally good—is absolutely susceptible to the narrative that is now being used to popularize the war. It says we are the good guys; we represent good values, and that's why we have to stand with Ukraine, because Ukraine stands for the good, for democracy, and for good values. That's a mendacious narrative, but it's catchy for people who approach politics in such a moralizing way. I notice that very clearly.

The leftist discourse supports the narrative that Putin is the bad guy, the aggressor, and we, in the West, are the good guys. But those are double standards."

"Looking at history, it is very clear that this war is not primarily about the question of ethnicity, of Russians against Ukrainians. It is about the question of NATO membership. It is about the question of NATO definitely renouncing possible military bases and missile bases in Ukraine. If the Russians had been assured of that, this war would probably never have broken out. Of course, it also has an internal Ukrainian background. After Maidan, the Russian minority in Ukraine was massively oppressed and attacked. This led to the secession of the Donbas. That question also plays into this whole war. But I think the big and crucial issue is geopolitics. This is about spheres of influence, and the Russians at some point felt they had to put up a stop sign. They want to halt NATO's expansion. I think that is also the only way we can end this war: if people are finally willing to compromise on this issue and signal this to Russia. "

"Right and left are upside down today."

"they no longer see that the left is representing them. There are surveys that say quite clearly that the largest share of AfD voters wants more social balance; we don't want to live in a society where profit rules everything. It's pathetic that we, as the left, allow people who think that way to vote right-wing. It's a mistake of the left in many countries that it doesn't reach these people anymore, and that they go to the right. And if you want to bring these people back, you are accused of being a right-winger. "

https://greenwald.locals.com/post/3451711/sahra-wagenknecht-on-the-ukraine-war-the-state-of-german-politics

Aloituksessa puhuttiin vasemmistolaisten talousosaamisesta. Mutta persu metsästää taas mahdollisimman leveällä seulalla valittamista sotkemalla vihreitä vasureita ja demareita.

Sitä paitsi Suomen Natojäsenyyttä vastustavista 6/8 oli vasemmistolaisia. Siellä europersut huutaa jäsenyyden puolesta kuin kokkarit ikään, ja astuvat jälleen kerran omiin miinoihinsa näkemyksineen.

Anonyymi00005 kirjoitti:

Koska joskus on vaan leikattava, ja jos tämä hallitus olisi edes yrittänyt säästää, niin seuraavan hallituksen ei tarvitsisi varmasti tehdä sitten kaikkia leikkauksia joita tulossa on.

Koronana aika porvarit ruikutti joka päivä sosiaali etuutta

Ei se osaa koska persuilla on alhainen ÄO. Ne osaavat vain valittaa ja kitistä kaikesta.

Huutelee punkki, joka luulee olevansa nokkela.

Eikö vassujen omaäly riitä?

Myös tulonsiirtojen eteen on alettava tehdä työtä. Eli mitä saat fattasta tai työkkäristä on se kirjattava hakijalle saaduksi lainana jota sitten lyhennetään kun ollaan duunissa.

Siitäkös johtuisi että Eu.n suomen metsien ennaltamis suunnitelmiin ei ajoissa puututtu ! Kuinhan ruotsi tuon älykkäästi vältti sen kuuluvan pelkästään kansalliseen päätökseen ! Tässä hyvä esimerkki Hallituksen kaiken tunaroimisesta ...!