Trumppi on saamassa syytteitä.

"Find me 20 000 votes" 👌🤣

'I just want 11,780 votes': Trump pressed Georgia to overturn Biden victory

Taas karvasta pettymystä luvassa teikäläisille. Trumpista tulee presidentti.

Anonyymi00014 kirjoitti:

Taas karvasta pettymystä luvassa teikäläisille. Trumpista tulee presidentti.

Unauthorized retention of national security documents
It is a crime to retain national security documents without authorization and to fail to deliver them to a government official entitled to take custody of them.

To win a conviction, prosecutors would have to show that Mr. Trump knew he was still in possession of the documents after leaving the White House and failed to comply when the government asked him to return them and then subpoenaed him.

Each such charged document would be a separate offense, so it is possible that prosecutors have brought as many as five counts of this offense by citing five different records. A conviction would be theoretically subject to 10 years in prison for each count, although defendants in other Espionage Act cases have received significantly less than the maximum.

To obtain a conviction, prosecutors would also have to prove to the jury that the documents related to the national defense, that they were closely held and that their disclosure could harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary.

Although Mr. Trump has claimed — without evidence — that he declassified all the files he took to Mar-a-Lago, prosecutors would not technically need to prove that they were still classified because the Espionage Act predates the classification system and does not refer to it as an element.

Conspiracy Charges
It is a crime to agree with another person to break a law. Prosecutors would need to show that Mr. Trump and some other person had a meeting of the minds about committing a specific crime and that one of them took some step toward that goal. The penalty can be up to five years.

Obstruction
It is a crime to conceal records to obstruct an official effort. Prosecutors would need to show several things, including that Mr. Trump knew he still had files that were subject to the efforts by the National Archives and Records Administration to take custody of presidential records. They would also need to be able to demonstrate that he willfully defied the Justice Department’s subpoena for files marked as classified, and that he intentionally caused his subordinates to fail to turn them all over while leading officials to believe they had complied. The penalty is up to 20 years per offense.

False statement
It is a crime to make a false statement to a law enforcement officer about a fact material to the officer’s investigation. Such crimes carry a penalty of up to five years per offense.

Mr. Trump is not known to have directly made substantive statements to the government, but prosecutors could charge him if they can show that he conspired with or induced another person to lie to the Justice Department about there being no further documents responsive to the subpoena.

Or, if prosecutors can show that he induced his lawyers to unwittingly lie to the Justice Department, they could charge Mr. Trump directly for causing the false statement even if he himself did not commit the offense himself. The law says that “whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.”

It is not known what the other charges are, but here are some possibilities:

Mishandling official documents
Whether or not the documents relate to national security, it is a crime to conceal or destroy official documents. Among other disclosures, former aides to Mr. Trump have recounted how he sometimes ripped up official documents. The National Archives has also said that some of the White House paper records the Trump administration transferred to it had been torn up, including some that had been taped back together. The penalty is up to three years per offense, in addition to a ban on holding federal office, although the latter is most likely unconstitutional, legal experts say.

Contempt of court
It is a crime to willfully disobey a court order, like the grand jury subpoena Mr. Trump received in May 2022 that required him to turn over all documents marked as classified that remained in his possession. It carries a penalty of a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in prison. To bring this charge, prosecutors would need evidence showing he knew that he was still holding onto other files with classification markings during and after his representatives purported to comply with the subpoena.

Anonyymi00018 kirjoitti:

Unauthorized retention of national security documents
It is a crime to retain national security documents without authorization and to fail to deliver them to a government official entitled to take custody of them.

To win a conviction, prosecutors would have to show that Mr. Trump knew he was still in possession of the documents after leaving the White House and failed to comply when the government asked him to return them and then subpoenaed him.

Each such charged document would be a separate offense, so it is possible that prosecutors have brought as many as five counts of this offense by citing five different records. A conviction would be theoretically subject to 10 years in prison for each count, although defendants in other Espionage Act cases have received significantly less than the maximum.

To obtain a conviction, prosecutors would also have to prove to the jury that the documents related to the national defense, that they were closely held and that their disclosure could harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary.

Although Mr. Trump has claimed — without evidence — that he declassified all the files he took to Mar-a-Lago, prosecutors would not technically need to prove that they were still classified because the Espionage Act predates the classification system and does not refer to it as an element.

Conspiracy Charges
It is a crime to agree with another person to break a law. Prosecutors would need to show that Mr. Trump and some other person had a meeting of the minds about committing a specific crime and that one of them took some step toward that goal. The penalty can be up to five years.

Obstruction
It is a crime to conceal records to obstruct an official effort. Prosecutors would need to show several things, including that Mr. Trump knew he still had files that were subject to the efforts by the National Archives and Records Administration to take custody of presidential records. They would also need to be able to demonstrate that he willfully defied the Justice Department’s subpoena for files marked as classified, and that he intentionally caused his subordinates to fail to turn them all over while leading officials to believe they had complied. The penalty is up to 20 years per offense.

False statement
It is a crime to make a false statement to a law enforcement officer about a fact material to the officer’s investigation. Such crimes carry a penalty of up to five years per offense.

Mr. Trump is not known to have directly made substantive statements to the government, but prosecutors could charge him if they can show that he conspired with or induced another person to lie to the Justice Department about there being no further documents responsive to the subpoena.

Or, if prosecutors can show that he induced his lawyers to unwittingly lie to the Justice Department, they could charge Mr. Trump directly for causing the false statement even if he himself did not commit the offense himself. The law says that “whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.”

It is not known what the other charges are, but here are some possibilities:

Mishandling official documents
Whether or not the documents relate to national security, it is a crime to conceal or destroy official documents. Among other disclosures, former aides to Mr. Trump have recounted how he sometimes ripped up official documents. The National Archives has also said that some of the White House paper records the Trump administration transferred to it had been torn up, including some that had been taped back together. The penalty is up to three years per offense, in addition to a ban on holding federal office, although the latter is most likely unconstitutional, legal experts say.

Contempt of court
It is a crime to willfully disobey a court order, like the grand jury subpoena Mr. Trump received in May 2022 that required him to turn over all documents marked as classified that remained in his possession. It carries a penalty of a fine of up to $1,000 and up to six months in prison. To bring this charge, prosecutors would need evidence showing he knew that he was still holding onto other files with classification markings during and after his representatives purported to comply with the subpoena.

Trump tulee istumaan 10 - 20 vuotta.

Anonyymi00020 kirjoitti:

Trump tulee istumaan 10 - 20 vuotta.

Kuolee vankilassa.

Anonyymi00014 kirjoitti:

Taas karvasta pettymystä luvassa teikäläisille. Trumpista tulee presidentti.

Trump putoaa.

Punainen aate on vaikuttanut sadan miljoonan ihmisen kuoleman.

Anonyymi00003 kirjoitti:

Punainen aate on vaikuttanut sadan miljoonan ihmisen kuoleman.

Se vainoaa toisinajattelijoita kuten aatteeseen kuuluu.

Yritetään keksiä vaikka mitä syytteitä että saataisiin suosittu Trump pois presidenttipelistä. Sellaisia nuo demokraatit ovat. Eipä puhuta Joe Bidenin ja Hunter Bidenin rikoksista mitään. Heitä ei saa arvostella hys. hys.

En sanoisi Trumpia kommuksi. Witunmoinen valehtelija, rikollinen ja maanpetturi se kyllä on.

Anonyymi00006 kirjoitti:

Yritetään keksiä vaikka mitä syytteitä että saataisiin suosittu Trump pois presidenttipelistä. Sellaisia nuo demokraatit ovat. Eipä puhuta Joe Bidenin ja Hunter Bidenin rikoksista mitään. Heitä ei saa arvostella hys. hys.

Heh heh! Kuules lörö, Trumpin rikoksista on _todisteita_ läjäpäin. Bideneistä ei ole MITÄÄN.

Anonyymi00009 kirjoitti:

Heh heh! Kuules lörö, Trumpin rikoksista on _todisteita_ läjäpäin. Bideneistä ei ole MITÄÄN.

HoHO hoHo ja kyllä varmasti löytyy öhö öhö

Anonyymi00012 kirjoitti:

HoHO hoHo ja kyllä varmasti löytyy öhö öhö

Vedä pedari tumppuus.

Anonyymi00006 kirjoitti:

Yritetään keksiä vaikka mitä syytteitä että saataisiin suosittu Trump pois presidenttipelistä. Sellaisia nuo demokraatit ovat. Eipä puhuta Joe Bidenin ja Hunter Bidenin rikoksista mitään. Heitä ei saa arvostella hys. hys.

Kyllä se on todistettu, että suuri rikollinen Trump on. Ihmettelen, että vaikka kuinka ilmenee noita talousrikoksiakin, niin kannattajat vain haluavat tuon rikollisen maansa presidentiksi.

Ovatko no Trumpin kannattajat kaikki itsekin rikollisia?? Siltä vaikuttaa. Ei rehellinen ihminen voisi äänestää tuollaista ketkua maansa preaidentiksi.

Anonyymi00009 kirjoitti:

Heh heh! Kuules lörö, Trumpin rikoksista on _todisteita_ läjäpäin. Bideneistä ei ole MITÄÄN.

Bidenin pojasta kyllä on, valitettavasti ja lienee melkoinen päänvaivan Bidenille. On aivan selvää, että jos presidenttimittelyssä on vastakkain Trump ja Biden, niin käyttää Trump tuota poikaa lyömäaseena Bidenia kohtaan.

Tulee vaikea taistelu tuosta keskustelusta. Toivoisin, että USA:sta löytyisi nyt joku nuorempi mittelöimään Bidenin sijaan tuossa taistelussa. Sääliksi käy, kun tuo ilkeä, inhottava Trump on vastassa taistelemassa vanhan, hauraan Bidenin kanssa.

Naapurissa ei kansa ole valinnut Putinia. Äänestys väärennettiin, kansa olisi halunnut muutosten tuulten puhaltavan Venäjällä. mutta sellaista ei sallittu, Putin itse muutti jopa lakia, että hänen valtansa kestää 2035 luvulle. Nyt muka puuhaa jonkinlaisia vaaleja, joilla ei ole mitään merkitystä, koska tuo luku 2035 on yhä voimassa.

Jep ja nämä ovat vakavimmat tähän mennessä. Bannon on haastettu todistajaksi.

USA on monin verroin parempi valtio kuin tuo naapurimme Venäjä. Rehtiä porukkaa on siellä, koska auttavat Ukrainaa pois tuon Putnin ahdingosta. Putinin joukot ovatkin, ONNEKSI, jo hätää kärsimässä. mutta sitä varmaan ei Putinille kerrota.

Natseja ei USA:ssa ole sen kummemmin kuin Ukrainassakaan. Putinin suuria valheita nuo natsijutut.

Miksi Bidenia pitäisi syyttää. Ei hän ole osallisutnut mihinkään rikolliseen. Hänen poikansa on ilmeisesti osallistunut rikollisen toimintaan, mutta ei kai se isän vika ole, jos aikuinen mies tekee rötöksiä.

Tietysti se on jonkinlainen maine haitta, varsinkin, jos joutuu taistelemaan tuosta presidentin virasta Trumpin kanssa.

Trump varmaan osaa käyttää tuota pojan rikollisuutta hyväkseen. Biden on vanha mies, ei varmaan saa puheen vuoroa tuolta suurrikolliselta, suunpieksäjältä, Trumpilta.

Todellakin outo maa kun trumpin kaltainen humpuuki ukko voi päästä presidentiksi. Liikaa lääkkeitä, liikaa kamaa, liikaa alkoholia tai niitä kaikkia että toi on mahdollista.

Enkä kyllä tajua sitäkään että suomessa jotkut fanittaa trumppia. No se kertoo jostain sekin. Meneehän sadostakin osa pilalle. Sille ei voi mitään kun tolloja riittää.

Anonyymi00024 kirjoitti:

Todellakin outo maa kun trumpin kaltainen humpuuki ukko voi päästä presidentiksi. Liikaa lääkkeitä, liikaa kamaa, liikaa alkoholia tai niitä kaikkia että toi on mahdollista.

Enkä kyllä tajua sitäkään että suomessa jotkut fanittaa trumppia. No se kertoo jostain sekin. Meneehän sadostakin osa pilalle. Sille ei voi mitään kun tolloja riittää.

Ei Trump pääse millään enää edes ehdolle, De Santis ja Mike Pence on selvästi suositumpia.

Siinä on kyllä maailmassa ihmettelemistä, jos tuollaisesta suurrikollisesta tulee suuren maan presidentti. Ei kyllä uskottavalta vaikuta sen maan hallinto siinä tapauksessa.

Siinä kyllä oletetaan tuon koko Trumpin kannattajakunnan olevan rikollista porukkaa!!

Niinhän se on, että vakka kantensa valitsee!!!

Noh noh, kyllähän USA:ssa nyt sentään lakia rikotaan ihan maailmaan tahtiin.
Eikä syylliset silti läheskään aina joudu syytteeseen.

Venäjällä saa jopa presidentti tapattaa joukoittain ihmisiä, jotka eivät ole samaa mieltä esim.Ukrainan sodasta. Siellä, tuolla meidän naapurimaassa onkin aivan erillainen komento kuin rehellisissä valtioissa.

Ihmetellä täytyy, miten voi jossakin maassa olla noin kerta kaikkiaan hullun mallinen hallinto, edes oikeuslaitos ei tuomitse rehellisesti, vaan syyttömiä suljetaan vankilaan ja annetaan tekaistuja syytöksiä ja vuosikausia kestäviä vankilarangaistuksia.

Venäjä on aivan alkukantainen maa joka suhteessa.!!!!!!