AUTTAISITTEKO SUOMENTAMAAN???

Peking...jne- tekstin? Olisin todella kiitollinen!

Jawohl, herr Kapitän! Achtung bitte! Himmel, englander! Du Schweinhund! Donnerwetter.

linkeistä apua?
http://www.canadiancontent.net/en/jd/go?Url=http://www.translationbooth.com
tämä kääntää alle 4 kb pätkiä tekstiä, mutta suomi maksullinen.

http://www.google.fi/search?hl=fi&q=translator programs&btnG=Google-haku&meta=

http://www.canadiancontent.net/tech/downloads/Language and Translator Programs/

englanniksi käännös tuolla tsunamilla:
30.03.2005 TopicFranc of price Axle Moscow - new Delhi - Peking? While the USA strengthen their influence in the post office-Sovietarea, Russia equips the military-strategic competition of the USAmericans with modern military equipment When George W. Bush and Wladimir Putin vibrated themselves on25 February in Bratislava tormented smiling the hands, each othermutual loyalty in the fight against the international terrorismpraised and a contract against the further spread further of portableair defense rockets signed, there blew not only by the roads a coldwind. It became indeterminable that the relationship of the USA toRussia worsened rapidly. The Bush administration is obvious firmlydecided to weaken the country crucially.Even the otherwise zerstrittene political establishment of the unitedstates is itself at present united whenever it applies to make againstRussia front. It formulated recently anyhow the influential directorof the institute for the USA and Canada of the Russian Academy ofSciences, Sergej Rogow so drastic. It continues even still anotherstep and means that a large part of the European allied ones of theUSA supports this course energetically. Russia, so Rogow, slanderedunder the accusation, it ever more to an authoritarian regime andpursue increasingly an imperial policy, in the world public. Since endof the cold war again the speech is first and with the help of theUkraine, Georgiens and soon perhaps also Moldavia and other statesRussia is constricted from deterrence.The USA strengthen their commitment in the post office-Soviet area ina kind and a way, which cause confusion in Moscow concern, sometimes.Expiration and participants of the "revolutions" in Tbilissi, Kiew andBischkek let arise probably in the broad population doubt about theofficially defined passwords and goals of the changes of power.Also the Russian outside and security politics blows an icy wind fromWashington and its European Dependancen against. Past the times, inwhich Russia was allowed to waehnen itself as junior partners of theNorth American friends and on the sun side of the postoffice-socialist political landscape. The ruege seems to follow eachstep of the Russians on diplomatic parquet from the State departmenton the foot. If Moscow agrees upon still another agreement over thecivilian atomic energy economy with Iran, then, one follows the civilpress, seems the fall of the evening country to be not more far.What is it however, the USA induced to fasten opposite Moscow such asharp pace? Putin on the way, a new Saddam to be become and is thecountry to be made the realm of the bad one? This will probably assumein this country hardly someone seriously. Suspicions of the present USadministration are not unfounded nevertheless opposite Russia.Strategic armament exportsRussia is in the process actual, one of the two columns, onthose the monopoly acres world order, which is based global supremacyof the superpower the USA, to destroy. The economy of the Russianfederation heruntergekommen in such a way and weakened that itexcludes itself opposite that of the USA rather dwarfful. Differentlyit looks however in military area. Here Russia inherited theirenormous armament-economical potential as a successor of the SovietUnion, although also of it much purged. The still existingpossibilities are however quite considerable. Without a doubt thegovernment Putin works to re-establish the military power of thecountry.Also India and China get ready to to exceed over their role asregional powers and strengthen their position opposite the USA. Thatdoes not come for the Americans surprisingly, although the speed ofthe economic ascent is larger, than prognosticates perhaps still someyears ago. Above all the rapid speed becomes problematic for the USA, with whichthe two asiatic newcomers succeed in reducing the militaryprojection/lead of the Americans. That is to be due not least toco-operation with Russia. This has a long tradition and also under thepresidency Boris Yel'tsin was continued. But while the Russian weaponexports were directed into the 1990er years primarily toward gainingof foreign exchange and these served the safety device of powerYel'tsin and for enriching its Gefolgschaft, one can subordinate quitepolitical goals to president Putin. Possibly the meeting was in such away reserved in Bratislava also, because Moscow makes an activecontribution for the attenuation of the US Imperiums.Russian-Indian partnershipThe arms show AERO INDIA 2005, which took place from 9 to13 February in Bangalore, seemed to be first one of the usual salesexhibitions for destruction and technologytechnology technology. Atthe edge the Indian Secretary of Defense Pranab Mukherjee explained,his country wants as prominent military powers to unlock and in thearea of the airplane and space technology powerfully particularlyup-get. It referred to the active assistance of Russia. Since itbecame however not concrete, the message caused first no particularlylarge interest. Then however, Moscow and new Delhi oozed alreadyconcrete negotiations across the sales or the farm lease of Russiannuclear-powered submarines at India would lead. And that is quitesomething unusual. As I in the past year in my book concerning theRussian Ruestung1 the possibility suggest, Russia could supplynuclear-powered submarines in the future abroad and on the ships ofthe project 971 (NATO code "Akula") referred, harvested I somedisbelieving being astonished.It is not anything new that Russia supplies nuclear power-drivenunterwasserschiffe at India. On 5 January 1988 took over the Indianthe Soviet K-43 of the project 670 (NATO class "Charlie I") andbaptized it on the name "Chakra" (S-71). That caused at that time ashock with Pakistan and particularly with its protecting power theUSA. It succeeded to Washington finally to induce Mikhail Gorbatschownot to extend on 5 January 1991 the running out leasing contractwhereupon the Indian had to return the pride of their fleet to theUSSR.That was however only a who courage drop in steeped in traditionSoviet/Russian-Indian military co-operation. Since independence 1947the USSR helped the country with the structure of its armed forces.The proclaimed unselfish solidarity stood thereby often only on thepaper. The USSR used India, particularly after its discord with Chinaend of the 1960er years, around their influence in the region to trueand that of the USA back urge. At the same time the Indian should helpto hold Peking in chess. In addition, new Delhi understood it to usethe large allied one for its interests. The USSR supported the partnerfor example in its fight against Pakistan, thus 1971/72 in theconflict around east Pakistan, the today's Bangladesh.After the decay of the USSR India became fast the main partner ofRussia in "military-technical co-operation", as the armament export inMoscow is called official. Russia collided occasionally with theinterests of the USA in the region.India is not at all more the backward country, than that is oftenstill seen it. The increasing resource gave in the last yearssufficient clearance to the Indian governments to increase efforts onarmaments and advance also into High Tech ranges, which regarded theUSA so far as their domain. Washington does not have objections inprinciple against arms purchases of India. It disturbs it however thatthe Indian are not military-technically relatively independent themunition with them constituted and thus of the USA.In order to clarify the range of the co-operation of Moscow with newDelhi, here only some examples from the last years: Since 2001 Indiabought 124 battle tanks T-90S and manufactures now 176 further in thecountry under license. About 1600 battle tanks of Soviet production ofthe type T-72, which is used in the Indian army, were comprehensivelymodernized. To fight India acquired the ultramodern, efficientreactive artillery system "Smertsch" (eddy wind) that able is, goalsin a distance of 70 kilometers and call thus already nearly tacticalrocket system is.The main activities of co-operation concerned meanwhile the aircraftconstruction and the naval armament. India acquired first 40 fighterplanes of the type SU-30 MKI in Russia and builds these since 2004under license (140 pieces).Together with Russia the highly effective anti-ship rocket "Brahmos"was developed and introduced. After the purchase of conventionalsubmarines of the Kilo class and three frigates of the project 11356(NATO code "Krivak Iii") in the last year finally the aircraft carrier(flight deck ship) was ordered "admiral Gorschkow" including theappropriate group of airplanes (MIG-29K) for full 1.6 billion USdollar by India.This incomplete enumerating might clarify also the layman that Indiapursues very far-put politico-military goals. Nevertheless the countryobviously did not blow up so far it by the USA granted the framework.The tendency of the Indian, lately increasingly more strongly the armsoffers of Israel, the USA, France, to pull Great Britain and alsoSweden (JAS-39 "Gripen" combat aircraft) in the calculation was notonly commentated in a well-meaning manner in Washington.Submarine shock in the USA?If the plans already mentioned should actually correspond to the truthfor the acquisition of Russian nuclear-powered submarines, thenWashington has to do however a quantity to attribute the Indian to thepath of the US virtue.Still the speech is not, but could it because of the "Akula" to itquite come of a submarine shock. In Russia the type of boat carries"Schtschuka b" (hecht) for the names and is like these a dangerous andfast robber. Between 1980 and 2002 in Sewerodwinsk and Komsomolsk atthe Amur 16 these as general-purpose ships designated combat machinesin different modifications produced. They are suitable for theemployment against large submarines and ship groupings, for puttingmines, for clearing-up and for "special tasks". The boat for itsopponents is particularly dangerous by the fact that it is extremelynoiseless and even Angeles"class strikes the US top models the" lots.Thus the boss of the operational department of the U. S. Navy, JeremyBorda, on it reported that the US navy had not succeeded 1995, a"Akula" i boat that at the west coast of the USA operated, undercontrol to hold. Even the congress busy particularly with this weaponand reached itself already 1989 that the Soviet Union removed therocket torpedoes "Schkwal" and "Wodopad" as well as the cruise missile"garnet" from its ships.From altogether eight torpedo apparatuses the "Akula" conventionalunderwater projectiles cannot only fire that. Also the atomicallyexpandable cruise missiles "garnet", which exceed the American"tomahawk" at 3000 kilometers of range, can be fired.An ultramodern weapon is above all the underwater rocket "Schkwal".This runs with a speed of more than 100 knots and is once shot, tohardly still fight against the opponent. If one considers the factthat the submarine has about 40 rockets and torpedoes on board then isclear everyone: Who in this league along to count on is. One does notuse such weapons against the combat ships, which are present in themarginal sea fleets of the neighbours of India. There is means for thefight against strategic nuclear-powered submarines and against groupsof aircraft carriers. These have however only the USA in theemployment. An enormous, furchteinfloessende Armada can become thus inits possibilities strongly limited or a militarily worthless heapscrap iron. What a nightmare for a superpower.India has without a doubt the goal of ascending to a military greatpower. Demographers refer to the fact that the country can replaceChina in few decades as the most densely populated country. Also theeconomic efficiency grows, and for a country possessing atomic weaponsand a country with own space research contradictions arepre-programmed for the current military strategy of the USA. India ishowever no Paria of the world community. It uses itself actively forthe force monopoly of the UN and is estimated as internationalofficial contacts. Also for Russia it is a pleasant partner. Betweenboth states there are hardly friction or points at issue. HoweverRussia knows that in armament-technical regard a further competitorarises for it. Therefore and because of the tension with the USA,resulting from co-operation, the partnership between Moscow and newDelhi is not completely uncomplicated despite everything. An argumentagainst anti-Russian steps of the USA is however always it.Purpose marriage or strategic alliance?China is, to India, the second largest partner of Russia inmilitary-technical co-operation. The relationship to the southeastneighbour for Moscow presents itself by far more problematic. Thereare strong political and ideological of resentment in Russia againstthe realm of the center. These are on the one hand aftereffects of thepolitical arguments and enmities, the end of the 1950er years to thebreak between the two countries fraternized up to then led. On theother hand Russia in China sees a strong competitor and knows the factthat the country does not only expand economically to Siberia butraises occasionally even territorial requirements against Russia. Endof the 1960er years had come it therefore even to armed borderconflicts in the far east of Russia.Beyond that one knows in Moscow that the USA seek to prevent eachmilitary stabilization of the VR China. The controversy over theWestern European weapons embargo is a descriptive example of it. Alsoagain and again the flickering human right discussions are at leastpartial, to see in this context.Militarily the People's Republic is still far to be the USA a genuinecompetition. The Americans register however with large unrest theprogress of the Chinese, particularly within the key ranges air andspace technology. Peking uses, around time and means to save foreigntechnology; with the military equipment Russia a special meaningcomes. The rapid development becomes clear, if one compares thetoday's Chinese army with from before 15 to 20 years. Nothing remindsmore of the old-fashionably prepared and badly trained mass army,which hurts 1979 more than 26000 dead ones and 27000 with its attackon small Viet Nam in the year to deplore had. Still at the beginningof the nineties Chinese air forces reproductions of Soviet combataircraft flew the early 1950er from years. Also the equipment of theground forces and the navy of the People's Army had only musealenvalue.Using the economic emergency of Russia after the decay of the USSR,the Chinese acquired first an apparently multicoloredzusammengewuerfeltes spectrum of combat aircraft, among other thingsdifferent versions of the SU-27. China jumped over thereby in shortesttime nearly two generations of flight technology and trained a largenumber of pilots.To 2001 40 machines of the modern SU-30 MKK in Russia were thenbought. Parallel to it one modernized the own fighter planes of thetype J-10 with Russian assistance. After the Chinese ordered alsostill engines, armament and radar facilities from Russia and finallymanufactured under license in the country, they had 380 most moderncombat aircraft in the existence within shortest period.The picture is similar during the air defense. There one acquiredcomplete ultramodern systems with the northern neighbour. To 2001 thatwas ten to twelve division complexes of the extensive air defensesystem S-300 as well as 27 air defense complexes of middle range(TOR-M1). Also the navy of the people republic profited strongly fromof Russia supplies. Thus in the years 2000 and 2001 among other thingstwo destroyers of the Sowremenny class were acquired. Peking alreadyordered two further ships of this type. Also submarines stood on thedelivery list. It concerned so far altogether four diesel electricships of the Kilo class.If China until a few years ago should not have known, how one buildsaircraft carriers, then one solved the problem, at least partly, inthe year 2000 with the help of the Ukraine. These sold that alreadyaircraft carrier cruisers finished to 70 per cent "be-hunt" at thescrap iron price to a Chinese company from Macao, which had explainedto convert this to a play casino. The ship became to 14. 6. 2000 fromNikolajew toward Asia dragged, then however nearly one and a halfyears by Turkey in the Bosphorus, allegedly for nautical safetyreasons, held. In Russia were some naval experts however the view thatthe USA wanted to make the Chinese more difficult the technologyacquisition.Russia anyhow does not seem completely lucky with the role, whichplays it during the process of co-operation with China. Still twopowers distrust each other. Whether the two unequal partners continueto approximate, how this is visible already in the so-called Schanghaigroup in the beginning, cannot be predicted. Under any circumstancesChina will not add itself however into the role of a junior partner ofRussia, and a Russia under Chinese dominance is also only withdifficulty conceivable.Unnoticed by the broad public to a large extent new power alliancesand tension lines in the world formed. "Pax Americana" does not onlycause concern, uncertainty and fears with millions humans on allcontinents. Also many states are conscious itself that the completesubordination is under the economic and political interests of the USAmericans in their countries economically, social and culturallydestructive.Their resistance over the democratic organizations of the worldcommunity, like UN and UNESCO, runs however due to the dominance ofthe USA and its allied one partly in emptiness. Thus it comes thatthose snubbed allegedly Ungehoerten and mean to have to provide witharmament hearing. Thus becomes however not only more uncertain thepeace. The rising defence expenditure eats dramatically more scarcelybecoming resources again, prevents the solution of innumerableproblems, which are still postponable hardly.1) "of the Katjuscha to the Kursk. The Russian armament ", Berlin 2004artikel_ende                   to the tagesuebersicht- This article was not in vain. Support this offer with aon-line Abo.     .