Pseudogeeneistä, apinan ja ihmisen sukulaisuudesta.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen/

Ja erityisesti koskien tuota AnsweringGenesiksen tekstiä:

"Creationist "John Woodmorappe" has written a long essay (with 152 references) arguing against the conclusions presented here. In his essay, Woodmorappe focuses on rare exceptions to the general principles outlined in my essay, while ignoring the vast amount of evidence supporting those principles (see section 5.8 below). A careful examination of Woodmorappe's references shows that many of them do not support the conclusions he claims they do. He has rehashed many of the false arguments that I have already rebutted in section 5. And he has raised irrelevant points insinuating that they somehow weaken the case for evolution, which they do not. In short, none of Woodmorappe's arguments make a convincing case against the conclusions of my essay. Futhermore, despite his criticisms of almost every point I have made, Woodmorappe fails to offer an explicit alternative interpretation of the data I have discussed. I hope to respond to the Woodmorappe essay in more detail in a future rebuttal that will be linked here."