Erityisesti kannattaa seurata sisäisiä linkkejä...
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001687.html
"What I find most striking in that article is that it portrays the status quo as assuming g is signficantly heritable, important, and varies systematically between races. This is a stealth status quo, because it has been universally denounced for the past 40 years or so in the West. It's as if everyone knows it, but no one speaks it, like some sort of dysfunctional family dealing with a wayward member. "
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/002424.html
"I keep running across references that lead me to believe that there is a scientific consensus in favor of g. Maybe those scientists are all racists, too. And perhaps so, too, are those scientists who recently found that, if you ask a computer to group a random set of people based on a survey of their genome, the computer comes up with groupings that most people would call "races."
"Now, obviously I don't mean these guys agree with GNXP on everything. But they do agree that human genetic differences - particularly heritable human differences in intelligence - are a worthy area of study, and not prima facie "racist" to consider. It is only a matter of time before the IQ issue once again enters the public arena with the publication of the hapmap. And this time, the outcome will be different. We will have the 21st century armaments of basepairs and brain scans to add to our stockpile of twin studies and test scores. It is, after all, difficult to denounce an image of a brain as institutionally racist..."
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/001687.html
"What I find most striking in that article is that it portrays the status quo as assuming g is signficantly heritable, important, and varies systematically between races. This is a stealth status quo, because it has been universally denounced for the past 40 years or so in the West. It's as if everyone knows it, but no one speaks it, like some sort of dysfunctional family dealing with a wayward member. "
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/002424.html
"I keep running across references that lead me to believe that there is a scientific consensus in favor of g. Maybe those scientists are all racists, too. And perhaps so, too, are those scientists who recently found that, if you ask a computer to group a random set of people based on a survey of their genome, the computer comes up with groupings that most people would call "races."
"Now, obviously I don't mean these guys agree with GNXP on everything. But they do agree that human genetic differences - particularly heritable human differences in intelligence - are a worthy area of study, and not prima facie "racist" to consider. It is only a matter of time before the IQ issue once again enters the public arena with the publication of the hapmap. And this time, the outcome will be different. We will have the 21st century armaments of basepairs and brain scans to add to our stockpile of twin studies and test scores. It is, after all, difficult to denounce an image of a brain as institutionally racist..."
Vastaukset 6
Vanhimmat
Mene noiden linkki hymiö viestiesi kanssa tuonne salaliittopalstalle, ok?
... tämä liittyy juuri tämän palstan aihepiiriin. Onko vain liian tuskallista luettavaa?
Näitä viestejä vain lappaa tuonne salaliittopalstalle samalla formaatilla koko ajan. Kertoisit edes oman mielipiteesi tms. etkä vain kopioisi toisten kirjoituksia.
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=114&conference=4500000000000580&posting=22000000010335847
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/show.fcgi?category=114&conference=4500000000000580&posting=22000000010246649
nyt esimerkiksi
... kiinnittää keskustelijoiden huomiota palstan aihepiiriä ja sen ehkä eniten keskusteltua aihetta sivuaviin tutkimustuloksiin. En kirjoittele salaliittopalstalle.
on toi sun kuvas? mua alko naurattaan ihan sairaasti ku näin sun kuvasi... hehehehfkjsfhskdff
Mitä meinaat, sehän on komea ja etpä tiedä, että myös nuorekas olemus ikäisekseen.