... pyörivät haudoissaan niin, että kolina käy:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1687992,00.html
The principle at stake was essentially the same as the one underlying The Bell Curve, a provocative tome in which Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein suggested that black people might be innately less intelligent than white people, that race is biologically real and that some races are intellectually superior to others. But the public reaction was strikingly different. There was none of the outrage that followed The Bell Curve's appearance in 1994. Instead there were thoughtful commentaries on the paper's arguments, and an undertone of complacency.
The British biologist Armand Marie Leroi argued in the New York Times that race was a scientifically meaningful and medically valuable concept. His case has the implicit support of the US Food and Drug Administration, which has approved a heart drug,
Last month, Pinker told the Edge website that "the dangerous idea of the next decade" will be the notion that "groups of people may differ genetically in their average talents and temperaments".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1687992,00.html
The principle at stake was essentially the same as the one underlying The Bell Curve, a provocative tome in which Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein suggested that black people might be innately less intelligent than white people, that race is biologically real and that some races are intellectually superior to others. But the public reaction was strikingly different. There was none of the outrage that followed The Bell Curve's appearance in 1994. Instead there were thoughtful commentaries on the paper's arguments, and an undertone of complacency.
The British biologist Armand Marie Leroi argued in the New York Times that race was a scientifically meaningful and medically valuable concept. His case has the implicit support of the US Food and Drug Administration, which has approved a heart drug,
Last month, Pinker told the Edge website that "the dangerous idea of the next decade" will be the notion that "groups of people may differ genetically in their average talents and temperaments".
Vastaukset 5
Vanhimmat
Miten sinä Havela, aikuinen mies, jaksat näilä keskustelupalstoilla roikkua vuodesta toiseen?
Voi hieraista suvaitsevaisten neniä p**kaan kerta toisensa jälkeen, eikä tarvitse edes valehdella yhtään. Lähes kaikki heidän hienolta kuulostavat ja ylevät "argumenttinsa" ovat paljastuneet kestämättömiksi jo aikaa, jäljellä ei ole enää kuin raivon täyttämää ininää ja haistatelua.
Edistyksellinen ja humaani, suvaitsevainen älymystö ei ole pitkiin aikoihin halunnut huomatakaan, saati kommentoida tällaisia uutisia, vaikka niitä heille osoitetaan alati kiihtyvällä tahdilla. Tämänhän piti olla mahdotonta! Rotuja ei niinku oo ja me ollaan kaikki samanlaisii, et niinku nöbörders ja kaikille kivaa, yo yo.
Tosin Gouldin esseet ovat mukavaa iltalukemista.
Suoraan kysymykseen suora ja lyhyt vastaus! Muistan lukeneeni palstoilta sellasta sinun sanomana, että natsit tappoivat sodan aikana vain pienen murto-osan siitä, mitä yleensä historiankirjoissa ilmoitetaan. (Siis 6 milj.) Vain olenko nähnyt unta? Siis, lyhyesti ja ytimekkäästi, ei mitään seli-selityksiä.
Luku 6 miljoonaa ei kestä tarkastelua.