I asked Dr. Sunder about 7 WTC. Why was the fate of the building barely mentioned in the final report?
This was a matter of staffing and budget, Sunder said. He hoped to release something on 7 WTC by the end of the year.
NIST did have some “preliminary hypotheses” on 7 WTC, Dr. Sunder said. “We are studying the horizontal movement east to west, internal to the structure, on the fifth to seventh floors.”
Then Dr. Sunder paused. “But truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”
http://newyorkmetro.com/news/features/16464/index6.html
WTC-tuhon (pää?)tutkija NISTistä sanoo, ettei NIST tahdo saada otetta Seiskasta. Hmm. Voisiko yksi syy olla se, ettei rakennuksesta ole ilmeisesti enää tallella kappalettakaan, jota tutkia?
This was a matter of staffing and budget, Sunder said. He hoped to release something on 7 WTC by the end of the year.
NIST did have some “preliminary hypotheses” on 7 WTC, Dr. Sunder said. “We are studying the horizontal movement east to west, internal to the structure, on the fifth to seventh floors.”
Then Dr. Sunder paused. “But truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”
http://newyorkmetro.com/news/features/16464/index6.html
WTC-tuhon (pää?)tutkija NISTistä sanoo, ettei NIST tahdo saada otetta Seiskasta. Hmm. Voisiko yksi syy olla se, ettei rakennuksesta ole ilmeisesti enää tallella kappalettakaan, jota tutkia?
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Later, Rodriguez met James Randi, a.k.a. the Amazing Randi, the magician best known as a debunker of supernatural claims, offering the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge to anyone able to demonstrate verifiable evidence of psychic powers.
“Randi was my mentor,” said William. “I admired him for his tricks but also because he never said they were anything but tricks. He separated the truth from the phony.”
James Randi from the Randi Educational Foundation: "Come on, in order to do a thing like that you would have to have a conspiracy that would involve thousands of people..all of whom would have to be completely silent. Now thats impossible to do."
We showed James Randi the claims of Dewdney's scientific group, and he countered each one -- beginning with the hole in The Pentagon.
James Randi: "Now the hole isnt big enough. Oh I see now you know how big the hole should be do you? No, that's data that we simply don't have."
As for those missing wings -- easy to explain Randi says.
James Randi: "That the fuselage penetrates the brick wall and the wings fold back just like an umbrella."
Finally the people who helped Dewdney research his theories are all well educated, very intelligent people which Randi says proves one more thing.
James Randi: "Well-educated intelligent people doesn't mean smart people."
Randi näyttää olevan samoilla linjoilla kuin moni täälläkin kirjoittanut että koko ajatus tuhansien ihmisten salaliitosta on mahdoton.
Eikö olekin kummallista ettei ainuttakaan tiedon murustakaan keltään asianosaiselta, ainoastaan tuhansia heittoja joista monet kaiken lisäksi täysin päättömiä mutta hyvin tuntuvat uppoavan!
"Come on, in order to do a thing like that you would have to have a conspiracy that would involve thousands of people"
Fysikaaliset todisteet menevät aina tuollaisten spekulaatioiden edelle. Kysymys on, voiko pilvenpiirtäjä luhistua huoneistopalojen seurauksena levosta käytännössä vapaan pudotuksen nopeudella suoraan perustuksilleen. Minusta sellainen on *mahdotonta*. (Se, että NIST on pallo hukassa Seiskan kanssa, tukee tätä.) Ajatus suuresta salaliitoon osallistujien määrästä on siihen verrattuna korkeintaan epäuskottava, eikä suurta määrää ole edes osoitettu välttämättömäksi.
"That the fuselage penetrates the brick wall and the wings fold back just like an umbrella."
Yeah right.
"Well-educated intelligent people doesn't mean smart people."
Eipä niin, ja tämä pätee puolin ja toisin.