Neitseestä syntyminen

on mahdollista.

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/sex2.htm

There is some evidence, however, that natural parthenogenesis does occasionally occur in humans. There are many instances in which impregnation has allegedly taken place in women without there being any possibility of the semen entering the female genital passage [2]. In some cases it was found either in the course of pregnancy or at the time of childbirth that the female passages were obstructed. In 1956 the medical journal Lancet published a report concerning 19 alleged cases of virgin birth among women in England, who were studied by members of the British Medical Association. The six-month study convinced the investigators that human parthenogenesis was physiologically possible and had actually occurred in some of the women studied [3].

Many primitive peoples believe that there are two methods of human reproduction: the ordinary animal one and a higher one rarely employed -- virgin birth [4]. One belief is that the rays of the sun can fertilize women. In this regard, it is interesting that ultraviolet rays can cause parthenogenesis in unfertilized eggs of sea-urchins. It is also believed that moon rays, wind, rain, and certain types of food can cause impregnation. In the 19th century the Trobriand Islanders of the western Pacific insisted that cases of virgin birth still occurred among them.

Further evidence for the possibility of human parthenogenesis comes from the mysterious phenomenon of dermoid cysts [5]. These are malformed embryonic growths or tumour-like formations occasionally found in various parts of the body, including womb, ovaries, and scrotum. They often contain bones, hair, teeth, flesh, tissue, glands, portions of the scalp, face, eyes, ribs, vertebral column, and umbilical cord. They are found in males as well as females, both young and old, including virgins. They appear to be undeveloped embryos and fetuses in various stages of growth. Loeb and several other researchers argued that dermoid cysts may be related to the parthenogenetic tendency of the mammalian egg, catalyzed perhaps by an increase in blood alkalinity. However, the body's parthenogenetic capacity is now very feeble and the generative centres lack the power to carry the reproduction process through to its proper conclusion.

It is possible that some cases of human parthenogenesis involve self-fertilization rather than true virgin birth, as there are cases of sperm being produced in women by vestigial, usually nonfunctional, male reproductive glands known as the epoöphoron (parovarium) and paroöphoron, which correspond to the seminiferous tubules of the testicles in males. In some instances, the magnetic influence and nervous excitement occasioned by attempted sexual intercourse may rouse into activity the latent, rudimentary male sex glands so that they secrete semen, resulting in impregnation [6].

References

1. J.B. Cibelli, R.P. Lanza and M.D. West, with C. Ezzell, 'The first human cloned embryo', Scientific American, Jan. 2002, http://sciam.com/explorations/2001/112401ezzell/index.html.
2. Raymond Bernard, The Mysteries of Human Reproduction, Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, n.d., pp. 47-50, 56-63.
3. Ibid., pp. 3-10.
4. Ibid., pp. 11-28, 89-93.
5. Ibid., pp. 51-5, 117; F.H. Buzzacott and M.I. Wymore, Bi-sexual Man or Evolution of the Sexes, Health Research, 1966 (1912), pp. 32-4; Hilton Hotema, Secret of Regeneration, Health Research, 1963, ch. 204-205, 211.
6. Secret of Regeneration, ch. 208-210, 234; Gray's Anatomy, http://www.bartleby.com/107.


---

Enää ei sitten tarvitakaan muuta kuin lapsen isoisältä peritty SRY-geeni, niin tuloksena on poika.
5323
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 5

Vanhimmat

...

Äänestä

Uskovaisten niinsanottua vaihtoehtotiedettä kylmille tieteellisille tosiasioille.
Neitseestä syntyminen menee sarjaan "usko tai älä".

Äänestä
  • Scientific Americanissa ei ole tapana julkaista "usko tai älä" -kategoriaa, eikä myöskään The Lancetissa julkaista vaihtoehtotiedettä.

    On kumma juttu, miten ateistit leimaavat heti "huuhaaksi" ja "vaihtoehtotieteeksi" sellaiset tieteelliset artikkelit, jotka todistavat Raamatun puolesta - sen sijaan että sanoisivat "no entä sitten, vaikka Jeesus olisikin syntynyt partenogeneettisesti, ei se ole mikään todiste hänen jumaluudestaan".

    (Ei muuten olekaan.)

    Äänestä

  • lähdekritiikki kirjoitti:

    Scientific Americanissa ei ole tapana julkaista "usko tai älä" -kategoriaa, eikä myöskään The Lancetissa julkaista vaihtoehtotiedettä.

    On kumma juttu, miten ateistit leimaavat heti "huuhaaksi" ja "vaihtoehtotieteeksi" sellaiset tieteelliset artikkelit, jotka todistavat Raamatun puolesta - sen sijaan että sanoisivat "no entä sitten, vaikka Jeesus olisikin syntynyt partenogeneettisesti, ei se ole mikään todiste hänen jumaluudestaan".

    (Ei muuten olekaan.)

    ... Jeesuksen neitseellinen syntymä tuli kristillisen kultin käsitteeseen vasta kun se oli ominut runsaasti ainesta muista Lähi-Idän uskonnoista. Olen aiemmin vertaillut kristillistä ainesta Osiris-kulttiin.

    Äänestä

  • Aurelianus kirjoitti:

    ... Jeesuksen neitseellinen syntymä tuli kristillisen kultin käsitteeseen vasta kun se oli ominut runsaasti ainesta muista Lähi-Idän uskonnoista. Olen aiemmin vertaillut kristillistä ainesta Osiris-kulttiin.

    Sinä sitten siihen "Osiris" kulttiin, kun sitä haluat nostaa parempaan asemaan, kuin Jeesusta?

    Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


partenogeneesi kirjoitti:

on mahdollista.

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/dp5/sex2.htm

There is some evidence, however, that natural parthenogenesis does occasionally occur in humans. There are many instances in which impregnation has allegedly taken place in women without there being any possibility of the semen entering the female genital passage [2]. In some cases it was found either in the course of pregnancy or at the time of childbirth that the female passages were obstructed. In 1956 the medical journal Lancet published a report concerning 19 alleged cases of virgin birth among women in England, who were studied by members of the British Medical Association. The six-month study convinced the investigators that human parthenogenesis was physiologically possible and had actually occurred in some of the women studied [3].

Many primitive peoples believe that there are two methods of human reproduction: the ordinary animal one and a higher one rarely employed -- virgin birth [4]. One belief is that the rays of the sun can fertilize women. In this regard, it is interesting that ultraviolet rays can cause parthenogenesis in unfertilized eggs of sea-urchins. It is also believed that moon rays, wind, rain, and certain types of food can cause impregnation. In the 19th century the Trobriand Islanders of the western Pacific insisted that cases of virgin birth still occurred among them.

Further evidence for the possibility of human parthenogenesis comes from the mysterious phenomenon of dermoid cysts [5]. These are malformed embryonic growths or tumour-like formations occasionally found in various parts of the body, including womb, ovaries, and scrotum. They often contain bones, hair, teeth, flesh, tissue, glands, portions of the scalp, face, eyes, ribs, vertebral column, and umbilical cord. They are found in males as well as females, both young and old, including virgins. They appear to be undeveloped embryos and fetuses in various stages of growth. Loeb and several other researchers argued that dermoid cysts may be related to the parthenogenetic tendency of the mammalian egg, catalyzed perhaps by an increase in blood alkalinity. However, the body's parthenogenetic capacity is now very feeble and the generative centres lack the power to carry the reproduction process through to its proper conclusion.

It is possible that some cases of human parthenogenesis involve self-fertilization rather than true virgin birth, as there are cases of sperm being produced in women by vestigial, usually nonfunctional, male reproductive glands known as the epoöphoron (parovarium) and paroöphoron, which correspond to the seminiferous tubules of the testicles in males. In some instances, the magnetic influence and nervous excitement occasioned by attempted sexual intercourse may rouse into activity the latent, rudimentary male sex glands so that they secrete semen, resulting in impregnation [6].

References

1. J.B. Cibelli, R.P. Lanza and M.D. West, with C. Ezzell, 'The first human cloned embryo', Scientific American, Jan. 2002, http://sciam.com/explorations/2001/112401ezzell/index.html.
2. Raymond Bernard, The Mysteries of Human Reproduction, Mokelumne Hill, CA: Health Research, n.d., pp. 47-50, 56-63.
3. Ibid., pp. 3-10.
4. Ibid., pp. 11-28, 89-93.
5. Ibid., pp. 51-5, 117; F.H. Buzzacott and M.I. Wymore, Bi-sexual Man or Evolution of the Sexes, Health Research, 1966 (1912), pp. 32-4; Hilton Hotema, Secret of Regeneration, Health Research, 1963, ch. 204-205, 211.
6. Secret of Regeneration, ch. 208-210, 234; Gray's Anatomy, http://www.bartleby.com/107.


---

Enää ei sitten tarvitakaan muuta kuin lapsen isoisältä peritty SRY-geeni, niin tuloksena on poika.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu