Afrikka on yllättäen alkanut kiinnostamaan jenkkejä. Mahtaisikohan sillä olla jotain tekemistä öljyn kanssa?
http://www.africafocus.org/docs04/eq0407.php
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/China/China_US_ColdWar_AfricaOil.html
" The case of Darfur, a forbidding piece of sun-parched real estate in the southern part of Sudan, illustrates the new Cold War over oil, where the dramatic rise in China's oil demand to fuel its booming growth has led Beijing to embark on an aggressive policy of-ironically-- dollar diplomacy. With its more than $1.3 trillion in mainly US dollar reserves at the Peoples' National Bank of China, Beijing is engaging in active petroleum geopolitics. Africa is a major focus, and in Africa, the central region between Sudan and Chad is priority. This is defining a major new front in what, since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, is a new Cold War between Washington and Beijing over control of major oil sources. So far Beijing has played its cards a bit more cleverly than Washington. Darfur is a major battleground in this high-stakes contest for oil control. "
Varteenotettava kilpailija tuo Kiina!! Taitaa tulla aikamoinen energiakamppailu seuraavalle vuosikymmenelle velkainen USA vastaan rikas Kiina.
" Today China draws an estimated 30% of its crude oil from Africa. That explains an extraordinary series of diplomatic initiatives which have left Washington furious. China is using no-strings-attached dollar credits to gain access to Africa's vast raw material wealth, leaving Washington's typical control game via the World Bank and IMF out in the cold. Who needs the painful medicine of the IMF when China gives easy terms and builds roads and schools to boot? "
Meikäläinen alkaa opettelemaan kiinaa. Täytyyhän uuden vuosituhannen supervalla kieltä osata!
" China has been generous in dispensing its soft loans, with no interest or outright grants to some of the poorest debtor states of Africa. The loans have gone to infrastructure including highways, hospitals, and schools, a stark contrast to the brutal austerity demands of the IMF and World Bank. In 2006 China committed more than $8 billion to Nigeria, Angola and Mozambique, versus $2.3 billion to all sub-Saharan Africa from the World Bank. Ghana is negotiating a $1.2 billion Chinese electrification loan. Unlike the World Bank, a de facto arm of US foreign economic policy, China shrewdly attaches no strings to its loans. "
http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/world/A0857293.html
Elikkäs te länsi- ja venäjämieliset unohtakaa jo nuo vanhat pierut ja valmistautukaa todellisen supervallan tulemiseen!! Kiina tulee näyttämään, miten asiat hoidetaan!
http://www.africafocus.org/docs04/eq0407.php
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/China/China_US_ColdWar_AfricaOil.html
" The case of Darfur, a forbidding piece of sun-parched real estate in the southern part of Sudan, illustrates the new Cold War over oil, where the dramatic rise in China's oil demand to fuel its booming growth has led Beijing to embark on an aggressive policy of-ironically-- dollar diplomacy. With its more than $1.3 trillion in mainly US dollar reserves at the Peoples' National Bank of China, Beijing is engaging in active petroleum geopolitics. Africa is a major focus, and in Africa, the central region between Sudan and Chad is priority. This is defining a major new front in what, since the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, is a new Cold War between Washington and Beijing over control of major oil sources. So far Beijing has played its cards a bit more cleverly than Washington. Darfur is a major battleground in this high-stakes contest for oil control. "
Varteenotettava kilpailija tuo Kiina!! Taitaa tulla aikamoinen energiakamppailu seuraavalle vuosikymmenelle velkainen USA vastaan rikas Kiina.
" Today China draws an estimated 30% of its crude oil from Africa. That explains an extraordinary series of diplomatic initiatives which have left Washington furious. China is using no-strings-attached dollar credits to gain access to Africa's vast raw material wealth, leaving Washington's typical control game via the World Bank and IMF out in the cold. Who needs the painful medicine of the IMF when China gives easy terms and builds roads and schools to boot? "
Meikäläinen alkaa opettelemaan kiinaa. Täytyyhän uuden vuosituhannen supervalla kieltä osata!
" China has been generous in dispensing its soft loans, with no interest or outright grants to some of the poorest debtor states of Africa. The loans have gone to infrastructure including highways, hospitals, and schools, a stark contrast to the brutal austerity demands of the IMF and World Bank. In 2006 China committed more than $8 billion to Nigeria, Angola and Mozambique, versus $2.3 billion to all sub-Saharan Africa from the World Bank. Ghana is negotiating a $1.2 billion Chinese electrification loan. Unlike the World Bank, a de facto arm of US foreign economic policy, China shrewdly attaches no strings to its loans. "
http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/world/A0857293.html
Elikkäs te länsi- ja venäjämieliset unohtakaa jo nuo vanhat pierut ja valmistautukaa todellisen supervallan tulemiseen!! Kiina tulee näyttämään, miten asiat hoidetaan!
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
luulet pikkuinen. Kiinalla on noista kolmesta eniten ongelmia, jotka sen on ratkaistava. Sen energiatarve on niin suuri, että ostamaan joutuvat ja paljon. Eikä Kiina voi jatkuvasti käyttää lapsityövoimaa. Maa on myös niin saastunut, että kohta joutunevat ostamaan juomavetensäkkin.
Kehtaatkin! Länsimaathan ovat se piru, joka ostaa sitä lapsityövoimaa!!! Kyllä on helppoa syyttää Kiinaa, mutta ei pystytä näkemään sitä, kuka todella ryöstää kolmansia maita.