Yhteiskunta huutaa apua!!

arvioi, ketkä ovat PAX AMRICA hankkeessa mukana. Aivan selvää että siinä on mukana myös virkakoneistoa.

3nd Jos haluat elää ole valmis.

4th Ota asiassasi yhteytä eri viranomaisiin siellä korkeimmilla tahoilla, rivipolaisiin heidänkin esimiehiinsä voit luottaa täysin , ei kaikki ole kytketty ja valjenneltu, eivätkä kaikki ole pelkureita. EU:n alueella voit ottaa sähköpostitse eri alueiden ja alojen päättäjiin.
Pääsääntöisesti vaikka olisi iso, iso herra ne joku lukee ja arvioi, joku nappaa asian aivan varmasti. Omiin tällä hetkellä en voi luottaa kaikilta osin. Olen pahoillani. Sellainen mielikuva tulee. Korruptiotta on kaikkialla – ei se ollut pointti ja tavallaan se voi olla ”ikään kuin” kätketty aivan luvalliseksi. Sillä ei voi mitään, pointtini on siinä, että EU: alueella on laajempi pelikenttä, joku varmasti ottaa asian. Voit olla siitä varma.

http://www.cptexas.org/articles/al90302.shtml
Millä nyt vaan sattu olemaan se onni, että idooteja siten lopulta kaikki - :)

Pax America

In ancient history, Pax Romana was the "Roman Peace" that is the peace enforced on the states (read conquered territories) of the Roman Empire. The period was characterized by many negative factors, not the least of which was the constant wars that Rome fought against her neighbors.

Today we have a new empire, the American empire that seeks to have peace by subjugating anyone and everyone who would dare to resist the projection of American power wherever it pleases around the globe. Like a giant schizophrenic beast, our politicians and other public servants have proven all too eager to send in the Marines, deploy the troops, launch the cruise missiles and generally let loose the dogs of war on anyone and everyone who dares to cross swords with us. How dare these infidel nations oppose our multicultural superiority, have they no respect for their betters?

This global projection of power is of course totally UN-Constitutional, not to mention that it is costly, wasteful and has earned us a slate of enemies throughout the world. In fact, one can hardly travel anywhere in the world without finding a raft of anti-American sentiment expressing itself in many myriad forms, many of them violent. Could there possibly be a reason for this anti-American hatred other than the patently dishonest and vacuously ignorant statement "they hate freedom" uttered by our senior public servant Georgus Bushtavius II?

America was formed as a Constitutional Republic, not another rendition of the "Holy" Roman Empire, if my recall of history serves me properly the last batch of lunatics that tried to establish an empire brought us concentration camps, the slaughter of certain religious and ethnic groups and a global war. That group of course was the Third Reich which ultimately failed although it brought about the death and destruction of millions of people and ruined entire nations. This Fourth Reich under the combined "leadership" of the socialist left and the socialist right (Democrat and Republican) has the technology and the ruthlessness to make Adolf Hitlers Third Reich pale by comparison.

Pax Americana has decided that Iraq has suddenly become a menace to the entire world and must be dealt with swiftly and decisively. I have heard in the past three weeks Iraq accused of everything from having nuclear weapons to causing the common cold and all points in between. To listen to Dick Cheney, Saddam Hussein is the biggest menace to world peace. In true Orwellian fashion we are being sold that the only way to ensure peace is to engage in the provocative act of war.

This of course is not only a fallacy but flies in the face of reason. For one, Iraq has been struggling by under a massive embargo that has created tens of thousands of innocent victims while harming very few of the ruling class. Political actions, including war, rarely affect the ruling class (of either side) while wreaking tremendous havoc on the poor souls who must endure the bad decisions of these rulers.

For another, Iraq might be mad but they are far from being insane. Launching a terrorist strike with Weapons of Mass Destruction or even a traditional one at this point would be inviting a massive nuclear retaliation from the United States. Iraq's Saddam Hussein wants to have absolute power on his own nation and possibly that of his neighbors, he doesn't have the desire or the ability to conquer and occupy the United States. Attacking the United States would do nothing to solidify Hussein's power and do everything to destroy it.

If Iraq should venture forth outside of her borders (again), what business is it of the United States? The combined military power of the other Arabic nations would be more than sufficient to deal with Hussein and he knows it. I fail to see where the life of one American soldier or the expense of one American taxpayer dollar is warranted. In short, neither the Constitution of the United States or the Republic are threatened by Saddam Hussein (despite all the fear mongering and garden variety propaganda spewing from the White House to the contrary).

Who then is being threatened by Hussein? For one, the Israelis are somewhat threatened by Hussein but they have proven capable of dealing with Hussein swiftly and decisively in the past. A pre-emptive strike originating from Israel however would be seen as the excuse most of the radical Islamics in the region have long desired for all out Jihad on Israel.

Kuwait no doubt is trembling in fear at the thought of another incursion from Iraq and possibly Iran may have reason to fear Hussein for their own reasons. I wonder how many Americans would be willing to go or send their own children to fight for the freedom of totalitarian Islamic dictatorships like these? Better yet, name one Islamic regime that any American would be willing to lay down his or her life for.

The only people who might have an interest in the region are a small and narrow handful of businessmen, specifically those who profit from the cheaper oil they can get. Couple that with the environmental lunatics who fear that a middle eastern oil crisis might mean a renewed push to drill the Anwar (a wasteland that the Alaskan people are solidly behind being drilled as it will be a tremendous boost to their economy) and you have an unholy alliance that looks and smells a lot like the special interest groups that run the two party system in Washington.

Only by ridding Washington DC of the politically compromised public servants from both the Republican and Democratic party (and sadly that would include nearly all of them) does America retain the hope for avoiding needless and endless wars, wars which create long term enemies that wait for any opportunity to strike back at us. Most of us in our private lives realize that enemies are expensive and try to avoid making them if at all possible and we would hope that our politicians would adopt a foreign policy that exercised such wisdom.

Sadly, as long as we have a two party political system wherein there is little if any difference in the method or outcome of their decisions, we will continue to be subjected to the negative repercussions of the would be ruling class. Our public servants as a result feel free to disregard the rule of law, the United States Constitution and common sense as they aggressively pursue policies of waste, greed and destruction. Voting for the lesser of two evils in these two parties, or simply to prevent the other party from gaining power only continues this problem.

The Constitution Party offers a real choice, one that stands on principle and not politics. While we believe in a strong military, it is designed to protect the United States, the Constitution and the national interests. We in the party believe that no American soldier who has taken an oath to uphold and defend the United States Constitution should be forced to serve a different agenda or cause, much less to give their lives for it, neither do we believe that even one taxpayer dollar should be spent fomenting wars and aggressive policies that benefit only a few.

Join the Constitution Party today and help us bring back sensible, Godly and Constitutional government.

Sincerely,
Al Lorentz
State Chairman, Constitution Party of Texas
3 September 2002

Al Lorentz's Bio.

Tutkailepa seuraavaa linkkiä,
mistähän vastaus löytyisi:)
edes osaksi...

http://www.edita.fi/publishing/uutuustuotteet/2006/20060927150717.html

1. MIKSI YHTEISKUNTA VOI HUONOSTI?

Koska Suomessa on vielä jäänteitä 90-luvun hyvinvointivaltiosta ja tasapäistämisyhteiskunnasta. Koska Suomessa on EU:n vastustajia, jotka jarruttavat kehitystä.

2. MITÄ TAVALLINEN AIKUINEN IHMINEN VOISI TEHDÄ ASIOIDEN MUUTTAMISEKSI, OIKEASTI?

Ei mitään.

3. MITEN?

Osallistumalla Eurooppa-päivän tapahtumiin, muun muassa kakkukisaan.

4. TEETKÖ SINÄ NIIN?

Osallistun EU:n toimintaan monella tasolla. Demokratia ei ole enää kansallista, se on ylikansallista, ja se on vain HYVÄKSYTTÄVÄ.

1.Esko aho ajoi Suomalaisia kovalla kaasulla eu hun ei tiedetty silloin eikä välitettykään tietää millaista seuraisi eun mukana ja alussa kaikki näyttikin valoisalta kiihkeimmät eu mieliset lue esim:(talolisen) kommentteja haluavat edeleen uskoa siihen kauniiseen eu fantasiaan että euroopan unioni kaiken hoitaa ja paskat! 2.Yhteiskunta voi osaltaan huonosti sen takia että joudumme maksamaan eu lle tukia siis maksamme sellaisille jäsenvaltioille tukia jotka ovat köyhiä olleet aina ja tulevat jatkoissakin saamaan eusta rahaa siis eu on köyhien maiden pankki joka rahoittaa toimintaansa typerin ilmastoveroin ym jäsenmaksujen muodossa, 3.tavallinen ihminen mikäli kansalaiset Suomessa tajuaisivat (yhdessä) vaatia eroa eusta koskapa yksityiselle kansalaiselle ei eusta ole mitään etua vaan haittaa ne eu edut ovat vain ainoastaan keksittyä potaskaa jota sosialistit viljelevät,4.kylläteen ja teen jatkossakin:) vastustan euta kaikin tavoin ja vastustan aina oikeistolaisia nyt ja aina:)