Onko jeesus vähän kopio tai jotain

Mut kai sä tiedät et egyptiläisil oli helposti yli 2000 eri jumalaa ja kaikil eri kykyi ja tarinoit.

Sä huomaat yhtäläisyyksiö pelkästään teräsmiehen ja jonkun egyptiläisen jumalan välil.

Ensinnäkin horus ei syntynyt neitseellisesti.
Osiriksen penis heitettiin jokeen ja uusi tehtiin tilalle.
Siitä sitten syntyi horus.

Raamatussa ei ole mainintaa 3:sta tietäjästä.
Lukumäärää ei ikinä ole kerrottu.

Tähti myyttiä ei edes tunneta horuyksen tarinas.
Se on keksitty, jotta tää sopis Jeesukseen paremmin.

Horuksella oli yli 16 seuraajaa.

Ja horus ei kävellyt veden päällä.
Oannes käveli, ihan eri jumala.
Sekin on vaan heitetty tähän et kuulostais samalt ku Jeesus.

Sanotaan et horus ois herättäny osiriksen kuolleist ja et täst ois tullu Lazarus Raamattuun.
Mut horus ei herättäny osirista kuolleista.'
Se kosti sen kuoleman vaan.

Ja minkäänlaisia viitteitä horuksen kuolemaan ja ristiinnaulitemiseen ei ole.
Minkäänlaisia samankaltaisuuksia ei ole.
Ainoa juttu mikä viittais tähän ois kun horus revittiin palasiks ja krokotiili jumala noukki sen sieltä ylös.
Siinä kaikki.

Ja tän jutunkin keksi yks Gerald Massey.
Ja sen väitteistä sit nää kaikki sai alkunsa vaik Massey väittikin et Jeesus olis useiden 2000 egyptiläisen jumalan yhteenkertymä.

Et silleen.

Kaikkea hyvää sulle ja Jumalan siunausta :)

Voisi olla tuollainen huono käännös egyptinkielelle evankeliumitekstin pätkästä!

TEHKÄÄ PARANNUS NIIN TULETTE TEITÄMÄÄN KUKA ON JEESUS
OTTAKAAT JEESUS VASTAAN
PITÄÄ UUDESTISYNTYÄ YLHÄÄLTÄ
TE ETTE TUNNE VIELÄ HÄNTÄ

Zeitgeist-dokumentti ei ole kovin luotettava, mutta Jeesus ja kristinusko on kyllä nykytiedon mukaan lainattu muista uskonnoista. Ei ole kyllä järkevääkään, että jessen historiallisuudesta olisi todisteita, sillä jos olisi, niin silloin kyse ei olisi uskosta, vaan faktasta, mihin silloin tarvitaan enää uskoa?

mistä olet nuo tietosi saanut, mutta tässä yksi linkki http://stupidevilbastard.com/index/seb/comments/ending_the_myth_of_horus/

"Claim #1-Horus and Jesus are born from a virgin.

Horus’s mother is Isis. Isis was married to Osiris. We do not know for what length of time, but presumably the marriage was consummated. Whether it was or wasn’t doesn’t matter though. After Osiris is killed, Isis puts him back together again (he was hacked into 14 pieces) except for his penis which was tossed in a river or a lake. Iris fashions a substitute penis for him, humps him and here comes Horus. There is nothing virginal about that.

Claim #2-Both Horus and Jesus were born to a Mary and Joseph. (Seb)

As noted Isis is Horus’s mother’s name not Mary. In addition, Seb is not Horus’s father, Osiris is. Seb is Osiris’s father. Further, Seb is a distinct name from Joseph. Putting them side by side does not make them synonyms, and that appears to be what was done here.

Claim #3-Both were born of royal descent.

This is accurate.

Claim #4-Both births were announced by angels and witnessed by shepherds.

I can find nothing that mentions that the birth of Horus was announced by an angel or witnessed by shepherds. I have found that Horus was born in a swamp, which is a pretty unlikely place for shepherds. In addition Acharya mentions that Horus was born in a cave. Massey makes no mention of this, although he does represent that Mithra was born in a cave.

Claim #5-Both were heralded by stars and angels.

There is no star that heralded Horus’s birth nor is there any angel announcing it. Archarya in a footnote in The Origins of Christianity indicates that that there are three stars named the three kings in Orion and then relates this to the birth of Jesus. When we look to the stories regarding Horus, we find no star or angel announcing his birth. To the extent that Acharya S relies upon Massey and Massey relies upon what is depicted in the panels at Luxor see (from an atheist) further regarding virgin birth and pronouncement by angels http://www.frontline-apologetics.com/carrier_luxor_inscription.htm

Claim #6-Both had later visitors (Horus-3 deities and Jesus-3 wisemen.)

There is no indication that there ever were 3 wisemen. The bible never mentions the number of wisemen, nor is there any document that reflects 3 deities at the birth of Horus. See the website referenced in Claim #5.

Claim #7-Both had murder plots against them.

There is mention that Seth did want to kill Horus, and Herod wanted to kill Jesus. so this is accurate.

Claim#8-Both came of age at 12, were baptized and their baptizers were executed.

There is no indication that Horus was preaching in a temple when he was 12. In fact, Massey indicates that Hours the child was depicted as a “weakling.” That doesn’t jive with story of Jesus preaching in the temple. Again this appears to have been a confabulation from Acharya and repeated by others.

Horus was never baptized in any of the Horus stories. In addition, Acharya mentions that John the Baptist is actually Anup the Baptizer. This individual is never mentioned anywhere in any Horus account. There is not even a footnote in Archaya’s on-line work The Origins of Christianity to support this. There is nothing.

Claim #9-Both had 12 disciples.

According to the Horus accounts, Horus had four semi-gods that were followers. There is some indication of 16 human followers and an unknown number of blacksmiths that went into battle with him. Horus did not have 12 disciples. Jesus reportedly did. Acharya failed to give a footnote to support this.

Massey points to a mural in the Book of Hades in which there are twelve reapers. Horus is not present in this scene. For Massey to make this connection he goes to a different scene within the same mural. In this scene there is a picture of a god whose name is the Master of Joy. Horus is never depicted although in other murals the artists do depict Horus. Had the artists ascribed 12 reapers in any relation to Horus all they had to do was put Horus at the scene. They did not.

Claim #10-Both walked on water.

Horus didn’t, or at least there is no record that I can find that he did. Massey does not maintain that Hours did. Massey uses wild conjecture to connect the story of fish man, Oannes, not Horus, to Jesus. Oannes came out of the sea during the day, and went back into the sea at night. Massey makes the two analogous because by his calculations, Jesus walked on water during the day.

As to Acharya, she as usual provides nothing to substantiate this.

Claim #11-Both performed miracles.

This is true although the miracles were different in scope and nature.

Claim #12 Both exorcised demons and raised Lazarus.

The actual claim is that Horus raised Osiris from the dead and that the name Osiris morphed to Lazarus. It doesn’t matter because Horus did not bring Osiris back to life. There is no mention of this in any document regarding the story. Horus did avenge Osiris’s death, but that did not raise Osiris from the dead.

Claim #13-Both held a Sermon on the Mount; both were transfigured on a mountain, died by crucifixion along with two thieves and were buried in tombs where they paid a quick visit to Hell and then rose from the dead after 3 days time, both resurrections were witness by women, and both will supposedly reign for 1,000 years in the Millennium."

vanhan Testamentin tarinoista joihin usein viitataan,se taas on osittain kopioitu Lähi-Idän muista kulttuureista kuten egyptiläisiltä.
Siksi samankaltaisuudet.
Jotkut tutkijat ovat huomanneet samankaltaisuuksia essealaisten temppelin ja auringonpalvonnan välilla.