Eettisesti oikeanlaiset ehkäisykeinot

Ehkäisykeinoja, jos esimerkiksi kierukka olisi väärin eli jos se on abortoiva?

Olisivatko silloin eettisesti eli Jumalan silmissä oikeanlaisia keinoja esim.
ehkäisypuikot ja femcap?
Esimerkiksi molempia yhtäaikaa.

http://www.femcap.com/femcap-description.php


Jostain internetistä:
"FYI to all who want to use birth control—a condom with spermicidal (used together) is very nearly as effective as the pill and prevents the egg from being fertilized—so is not an abortifactant."

Luonnonmukaiset menetelmät ovat myös oikein.


Ehkäisypuikon käytön ei pitäisi olla vaarallista lapselle (sikiölle):
"No pattern of malformations was found in spermicide-exposed infants. The risk of preterm delivery, the risk for producing a low birthweight (2500 gm) infant, and the risk of spontaneous abortion were no higher in women exposed to spermicides than in women using other methods of contraception. This study finds no evidence that spermicide exposure around the time of conception is dangerous to the fetus."
http://www.popline.org/docs/0679/029289.html


Kierukoiden abortoivuudesta.
Olen kysynyt parilta maalliselta suomalaiselta gynekologilta, jotka työskentelevät alalla, asiaa, ja vastaus on ollut sen tapainen että joskus munasolu voi hedelmöittyä ja joskus ei. Jos munasolu hedelmöittyy, niin sen jälkeenhän kierukka estäisi hedelmöittyneen munasolun kiinnittymisen, joka on väärin. Sellaista toiminnallisuutta ei saisi olla olemassakaan kierukassa. Eli se (kierukka) olisi silloin abortoiva ainakin joissain tapauksissa mahdollisesti.


Ehkäisypuikko=spermicide ei abortoi, mutta IUD=kierukka olisi abortoiva:
To this day, most people do not realize that every form of contraception other than barrier methods (condoms or spermicides) work by thwarting implantation in at least some cases. Norplant, IUDs, Norplant, Implanon, so-called "emergency contraception," and, of course, the feminists' beloved "pill" are all abortifacient.
http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/mos/mos_124meaningpregnant.html


Wikipedia, "ensisijainen" kierukan mekanismi olisi ok, mutta "toissijainen" mekanismi ei:

When used as ongoing contraception, the primary mechanism of action of the IUD is spermicidal/ovicidal. However, post-fertilization mechanisms are believed by some physicians to contribute significantly to their effectiveness,[42][43] and may be a primary mechanism when the IUD is used as emergency contraception.[44] Because many pro-life individuals and organizations define fertilization as the beginning of pregnancy, this possible secondary mechanism of action has led some pro-life individuals and organizations to label the IUD an abortifacient. More recent analysis indicates that IUD operate earlier in the reproductive process than was previously thought.[35] Since IUD prevent "chemical pregnancies," tubal flushing studies do not find fertilized eggs in women using IUD, and IUD markedly reduces the rate of ectopic pregnancies, Contraceptive technology concludes that IUD prevent fertilization.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrauterine_device