Kaikki syövät lisääntyvät hurjaa vauhtia:
"According to the National Cancer Institute, cancer incidence (all sites) in the US increased by 55% between 1950 and 1995 ; the trends in Europe and other industrialised nations are similar. Non-smoking related cancers are responsible for about 75% of the overall increased incidence of cancer since 1950, and cannot be explained in terms of better detection or ageing (13). Cancer incidence increases in parallel with gross national product and industrialisation but the obvious explanation for this phenomenon – environmental pollution, chemical and radioactive – is ignored. Perversely, victims are blamed for their lifestyles."
http://www.independentwho.info/spip.php?article184
Yleensä syöpien lisääntymistä perusteellaan sillä, että väeestön elinikä kasvaa, mutta miksi lasten syövät sitten lisääntyvät kaikkein nopeimmin?
"Based on 100,596 children with cancer, the average cancer incidence rate was 118 per million in the 1970s, 124 in the 1980s, and 139 in the 1990s, increasing significantly by 1% per year on average.
In adolescents aged 15-19, the rates increased by 1.5% per year on average: the corresponding incidence rates were 147 in the 1970s, 165 in the 1980s and 193 in the 1990s, based on 15,460 cases of cancer.
The study shows an increase for all types of cancer in both children and adolescents, leukaemias and brain tumours being the most common cancers in children in Europe, while carcinomas and lymphomas occur most frequently in teenagers. Dr Steliarova-Foucher adds: 'This increase in cancers is evident at all ages but is greater in children under four and in adolescents."
http://www.iarc.fr/en/Media-Centre/IARC-Press-Releases/Archives-2006-2004/2004/IARC-study-shows-increasing-Cancer-rates-in-children-in-Europe
Tässä ei ole yksin kyse Tsernobylistä (joka vastasi noin kahta sataa ydinkoetta ilmakehässä) vaan, niin mistä....
"According to the National Cancer Institute, cancer incidence (all sites) in the US increased by 55% between 1950 and 1995 ; the trends in Europe and other industrialised nations are similar. Non-smoking related cancers are responsible for about 75% of the overall increased incidence of cancer since 1950, and cannot be explained in terms of better detection or ageing (13). Cancer incidence increases in parallel with gross national product and industrialisation but the obvious explanation for this phenomenon – environmental pollution, chemical and radioactive – is ignored. Perversely, victims are blamed for their lifestyles."
http://www.independentwho.info/spip.php?article184
Yleensä syöpien lisääntymistä perusteellaan sillä, että väeestön elinikä kasvaa, mutta miksi lasten syövät sitten lisääntyvät kaikkein nopeimmin?
"Based on 100,596 children with cancer, the average cancer incidence rate was 118 per million in the 1970s, 124 in the 1980s, and 139 in the 1990s, increasing significantly by 1% per year on average.
In adolescents aged 15-19, the rates increased by 1.5% per year on average: the corresponding incidence rates were 147 in the 1970s, 165 in the 1980s and 193 in the 1990s, based on 15,460 cases of cancer.
The study shows an increase for all types of cancer in both children and adolescents, leukaemias and brain tumours being the most common cancers in children in Europe, while carcinomas and lymphomas occur most frequently in teenagers. Dr Steliarova-Foucher adds: 'This increase in cancers is evident at all ages but is greater in children under four and in adolescents."
http://www.iarc.fr/en/Media-Centre/IARC-Press-Releases/Archives-2006-2004/2004/IARC-study-shows-increasing-Cancer-rates-in-children-in-Europe
Tässä ei ole yksin kyse Tsernobylistä (joka vastasi noin kahta sataa ydinkoetta ilmakehässä) vaan, niin mistä....
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Minä en kelpaa lukijalaskuriin, olen lukenut tarinan monta kertaa mutta laskuri ei juokse.
Syöpien lisääntyminen on liitetty joissain tutkimuksissa ydinteollisuuteen ja toisissa sisäilmaongelmaan, joita kumpaakaan ei saa tutkia riittävän tarkasti jotta ei voitaisi kiistää! Suuri raha kun pitää olla eniten suojeltuna, veronmaksajan terveydellä ei väliä ole lainkaan! Ihme turvallisuusvirastoja perustettu kusemaan silmään sanoen että viranomaiset huolehtivat turvallisuudestamme. Totuus on kuitenkin se, että viranomaisvastuu on olematon, valituksilla ei ole mitään merkitystä eikä byrokratia ole kuin tehty suojelemaan itseään! Ihmiset saavat kuolla pois! Lääketeollisuus hyötyy sitten elon loppumetreistä käärien kaikki ruuasta ylijäävät eurot liiveihinsä!