...kun kuulen itsemurhaiskuista, terrorismista, terroriuhista, massamurhaajista, haponheittäjistä, kivittäjistä, pedofiileista, naisen alistamisista, moniavioisuudesta, kansankiihotuksista, pyhistä sodista, suvaitsemattomuudesta, sopeutumattomuudesta....jne...jne... tulen aina yhdistämään ne yhteen ja samaan uskontoa edustavaan joukkioon.
Mistä se johtuu?
Mm11092001
4656
0Äänestä
Muut lukivat myös
Odottaa vastausta
Näihin keskusteluihin ei ole vielä vastattu. Ole ensimmäinen.
Vastaukset 4
Vanhimmat
Se todellakin johtuu siitä kenen uutisia seuraat. Valtamediat ovat isonrahan ohjailemia ja omien etuuksien valvovien hallussa. Etsi internetistä myöskin se toinen totuus ja vertaa sitä sitten siihen niin sanottuun "viralliseen totuuteen". Kaikilla asioilla on toinenkin totuus.
asustavaan mölliin !!! Mölli on seonnut.......
tässä hieman laadukasta infoa, aluksi tuosta, linkissä paljon faktaa lisää.
"Afghanistan – to be or not?
Some historical background
In Afghanistan, prior to the Russian invasion, the PDPA or ( the Peoples Democratic Party of
Afghanistan) invited the USSR to assist in modernizing its economic infrastructure, mainly exploration and mining of minerals and natural gas. The USSR also sent contractors to build hospitals, roads and schools and to drill water wells. They also trained and equipped the Afghan army. The country was then renamed the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA), and the PDPA regime lasted, in some form or another, until April 1992.
Once in power, the PDPA moved to permit freedom of religion and carried out an ambitious land reform waiving farmers’ debts countrywide. They also made a number of statements on women’s rights and introduced women to political life. A prominent example was Anahita Ratebzad, who was a major Marxist leader and a member of the Revolutionary Council. Ratebzad wrote the famous May 28, 1978 New Kabul Times editorial which declared: “Privileges which women, by right, must have are equal education, job security, health services, and free time to rear a healthy generation for building the future of the country … Educating and enlightening women is now the subject of close government attention.”
As part of a Cold War, in 1979 the United States government began to covertly fund forces ranged against the pro-Soviet government, although warned that this might prompt a Soviet intervention. The secular nature of the government made it unpopular with conservative Afghans in the villages and the countryside who favoured traditionalist ” Islamic” restrictions on women’s rights and in daily life. Many groups, led by members of the traditional establishment were formed, some of them resorting to violence and sabotage to the country’s infrastructure and industry. under the umbrella of Mujahideen, or ” Holy Muslim Warriors”. The Mujahideen belonged to various different factions, but all shared, to varying degrees, a similarly conservative ‘Islamic’ ideology. "
http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/afghanistan-–-to-be-or-not/
Kristinuskoa?