Noudattaako tele-ala perustuslakia?

Hmm-sanoja kirjoitti:

Ihmetyttää kaikenlainen salailu ja vehkeily.
Mikä lie ollut laitteiden tietoturva,
perustuslaki sitä vaatii, epäilenpä, että
potentiaalisestikin lakia jo rikotaan. Ei taida
säteilevissä laitteissa tietokone-ohjelma-koodit
riittää turvaksi, enhän minä tästä palkkaa muuten
saa, mutta niin se on.

http://www.electric-
words.com/cell/radiation/media.html

"Why the delays in publishing?
Two years have gone by since the basic statistics
were done, but the findings were of such a nature
that follow-up work needed to be done with a
laboratory in Maryland, USA to confirm some
results, then it took four tries to get the work
published. The rejections were not on the basis
of inadequate science, however, but on purely
political grounds, according to those involved.
The subject was too hot for many scientific
journals to handle.

According to one of those involved, 'Science'
magazine rejected publication on the grounds that
the report "would cause a panic"

"I couldn't agree more on the last point, but
nothing done in the last few years with the
exception of the Drs. Lai-Singh work in Seattle
has more obviously established that cell-phone
safety has not yet been proved. There has been
evidence accumulating over many years that the
long-term effects of radio-frequency exposures
may have serious consequences for a small percent
of the population, but this has been ignored by
the industry and by governments. "



"The total exposure period is very much less than
can be expected from human use over a lifetime,
so while some of the scientists downplayed the
importance, saying, "humans are not rodents"
another pointed out that "DNA is DNA". If the
radiation effects the mice, it will almost
certainly effect humans. "


http://www.electric-
words.com/cell/industry/repacholi/rep-senate.html

"...Twenty per cent of these animals in this case
were going to get lymphoma, which in fact was
what we found, but we also found, of course, that
if you expose them to GSM signals this doubled
the incidence of cancer.
There have been a number of criticisms of the
study, that it did not go for long enough. We
only did 18 months, and the reason for doing 18
months was because we did not want to have the
diseases that occur with age. In the last six
months you get all sorts of age related diseases
occurring, which can confuse the results, so we
wanted to have a look at 18 months when they were
relatively healthy, and we could just concentrate
on what we wanted to do. "

"we spent a long time looking at this before we
finally finished our publication because we
thought we had done something terribly wrong
because it seemed that the result was quite
dramatic. We knew that we had not overheated the
animals, but we did not know what else could have
occurred, so that delayed the study-plus a few
journals felt that it was too hot to handle so we
got a few rejections on the publication. "

"The one message I would really like to convey
though is that motorists should be strongly
discouraged from using mobile phones while
driving. There is no doubt that- "

---------------------------------------
Salaperäisesti kadonneita tutkimuksia!

lue:

http://www.electric-
words.com/cell/research/vanishedindex.html

-------------------------------------------

http://www.electric-
words.com/cell/radiation/adelaide.html

The Adelaide Hospital Study This was a major
report from Adelaide Hospital in Australia, which
established a clear link between pulsed GSM phone
handset radiation levels, and tumour promotion in
genetically-engineered mice. The importance of
this study is that it kills, once and for all,
the old "Thermal Only" claims. It is also often
called the "Repacholi Study".

Similar findings from other research. The
Adelaide Hospital study findings were not an
isolated instance. There have been dozens of
findings over the years which have indicated
similar links with DNA and potential cancer
problems.


--- Hyvä tietää ----

Media Manipulation

Attempts are being made to manipulate the
Australian media into not reporting this story --
or reporting it in a one-par box hidden in the
back pages. The industry "experts" are out in
force trying to hose down any suggestion that
these findings are worrying, and Dr Repacholi is
being bought it via an expensive video-conference
to explain why this research should be ignored.
See Media Manipulation.

This must be the only time in history when so
much money and so much energy has been put into
convincing the media that important research is
of little value -- by the scientist themselves!

http://www.electric-
words.com/cell/radiation/media.html

kirjoitti:

Anonyymi

Kirjoita kommentti

5000

Lähetä