Rasvaimun seuraukset

Liposuction has its drawbacks, says Colorado study
May 10, 2011 by admin
Filed under Blog
Leave a Comment
Drs. Robert H. Eckel and Teri L. Hernandez of the University of Colorado recently led a study that sought to clarify the long term effects of liposuction. They assigned a group of women to undergo liposuction as well as a control group to refrain from the procedure, then checked up on both groups regularly over the course of the next year. Surprisingly, each woman who had liposuction performed gained back all of the fat that was removed by the procedure.

The fat, however, did not return to the location from which it was removed, but instead was distributed throughout the upper abdomen and even the arms. The reason for the odd redistribution, says Dr. Klein, the director of the Center for Human Nutrition at the Washington University School of Medicine, may be that liposuction destroys the tissues beneath the skin that fat develops on, making it difficult or impossible for fat to re-accumulate at that site.

Obesity researchers say they aren’t surprised by the study’s findings. The body is protective of its fatty deposits, they say, and works to reproduce and maintain them if they’re removed or reduced. This is a fairly well known fact, and its ramifications have been stressing out dieters throughout the ages. “Gaining it back” is a pitfall that plagues all kinds of short-term diets.

The fact is that a person’s body is an accurate reflection of their lifestyle. Any weight lost through surgery or even a thirty day tooth-and-nail dieting effort is bound to return if the lifestyle that put it there in the first place isn’t turned around.

Do these findings spell trouble for liposuction? Hardly. They do, perhaps, illuminate the difference between corrective and preventative measures, and highlight the limitations of the former. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Americans still underwent 200,000 liposuction procedures last year. That’s not all, either. Remember the University of Colorado’s control group? More than half of them opted for liposuction even after the results of the study came back.
2134
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 2

Vanhimmat

Paljon tekstiä mutta vähän asiaa.Amerikkalaiset pystyvät kirjoittamaan ensyklopedian vaikka ovennupista.

Äänestä

Rasva on ikuista, ei siitä mihinkään pääse. Saattaa vaihtaa vain paikkaa.

Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


totta,koettu on kirjoitti:

Liposuction has its drawbacks, says Colorado study
May 10, 2011 by admin
Filed under Blog
Leave a Comment
Drs. Robert H. Eckel and Teri L. Hernandez of the University of Colorado recently led a study that sought to clarify the long term effects of liposuction. They assigned a group of women to undergo liposuction as well as a control group to refrain from the procedure, then checked up on both groups regularly over the course of the next year. Surprisingly, each woman who had liposuction performed gained back all of the fat that was removed by the procedure.

The fat, however, did not return to the location from which it was removed, but instead was distributed throughout the upper abdomen and even the arms. The reason for the odd redistribution, says Dr. Klein, the director of the Center for Human Nutrition at the Washington University School of Medicine, may be that liposuction destroys the tissues beneath the skin that fat develops on, making it difficult or impossible for fat to re-accumulate at that site.

Obesity researchers say they aren’t surprised by the study’s findings. The body is protective of its fatty deposits, they say, and works to reproduce and maintain them if they’re removed or reduced. This is a fairly well known fact, and its ramifications have been stressing out dieters throughout the ages. “Gaining it back” is a pitfall that plagues all kinds of short-term diets.

The fact is that a person’s body is an accurate reflection of their lifestyle. Any weight lost through surgery or even a thirty day tooth-and-nail dieting effort is bound to return if the lifestyle that put it there in the first place isn’t turned around.

Do these findings spell trouble for liposuction? Hardly. They do, perhaps, illuminate the difference between corrective and preventative measures, and highlight the limitations of the former. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Americans still underwent 200,000 liposuction procedures last year. That’s not all, either. Remember the University of Colorado’s control group? More than half of them opted for liposuction even after the results of the study came back.

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu