NATO UPOTTI ESTONIAN - juutalaisnatsit sieltä

Eli suomeksi: nato harjoitteli pommi attentaattia laivaan mallista harkkaa enen uppoamista siellä!

Tuttu kaava kirjoitti:

Eli suomeksi: nato harjoitteli pommi attentaattia laivaan mallista harkkaa enen uppoamista siellä!

Näillä se David Hertzog uhkaili jo Suomea jumalan kostona!

Tulossa lisää iskuja kirjoitti:

Näillä se David Hertzog uhkaili jo Suomea jumalan kostona!

Although it is seldom mentioned, the Estonia catastrophe occurred on the first day of a 10-day NATO naval exercise called Cooperative Venture 94, in which more than 15 ships and "a number of maritime aircraft" were prepared to conduct "humanitarian and search and rescue operations" in nearby waters.

The NATO exercise, which involved 10 NATO member states and the Baltic "partner" nations of Russia, Sweden, Poland, and Lithuania, was to be staged in the Skagerrak, between Denmark and Norway, and the Norwegian Sea, according to the NATO press release about the exercise from September 16, 1994.

The NATO nations who participated in the exercise were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States. Many other allies and partners sent observers to the exercise, according to the NATO press release.

The fact that Estonia sank as the submarines, ships, planes, personnel, and satellites from the navies of 14 nations were preparing to begin their 10-day "search and rescue operations" exercise off the coast of Sweden raises several obvious questions that deserve to be answered: First and foremost, if NATO had 15 ships and a number of aircraft assembled and prepared to conduct "search and rescue operations," why didn't NATO assist in the early morning rescue operation for the victims from the Estonia catastrophe?

The Swedish rescue helicopters were ill-prepared and ill-equipped, which resulted in a fatal delay for those waiting to be rescued.

"Were there specially-equipped rescue helicopters or other aircraft that could have assisted?" Drew Wilson, author of The Hole (2006), a book about the Estonia catastrophe, wrote:
Survivors who didn't die from hypothermia while floating on upturned boats or flotsam in the biting water waited four-six hours for rescue. NATO search-and-rescue personnel and equipment could have saved some lives. Flying time was under 1 hour. Why didn't they respond to the distress traffic? What happened?
The evidence indicates that the Mayday signals from Estonia had been jammed, as were all radio communications in the area.

Lisää tietoa kirjoitti:

Although it is seldom mentioned, the Estonia catastrophe occurred on the first day of a 10-day NATO naval exercise called Cooperative Venture 94, in which more than 15 ships and "a number of maritime aircraft" were prepared to conduct "humanitarian and search and rescue operations" in nearby waters.

The NATO exercise, which involved 10 NATO member states and the Baltic "partner" nations of Russia, Sweden, Poland, and Lithuania, was to be staged in the Skagerrak, between Denmark and Norway, and the Norwegian Sea, according to the NATO press release about the exercise from September 16, 1994.

The NATO nations who participated in the exercise were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, United Kingdom, and the United States. Many other allies and partners sent observers to the exercise, according to the NATO press release.

The fact that Estonia sank as the submarines, ships, planes, personnel, and satellites from the navies of 14 nations were preparing to begin their 10-day "search and rescue operations" exercise off the coast of Sweden raises several obvious questions that deserve to be answered: First and foremost, if NATO had 15 ships and a number of aircraft assembled and prepared to conduct "search and rescue operations," why didn't NATO assist in the early morning rescue operation for the victims from the Estonia catastrophe?

The Swedish rescue helicopters were ill-prepared and ill-equipped, which resulted in a fatal delay for those waiting to be rescued.

"Were there specially-equipped rescue helicopters or other aircraft that could have assisted?" Drew Wilson, author of The Hole (2006), a book about the Estonia catastrophe, wrote:
Survivors who didn't die from hypothermia while floating on upturned boats or flotsam in the biting water waited four-six hours for rescue. NATO search-and-rescue personnel and equipment could have saved some lives. Flying time was under 1 hour. Why didn't they respond to the distress traffic? What happened?
The evidence indicates that the Mayday signals from Estonia had been jammed, as were all radio communications in the area.

Ei me voita antta niitä kun tuota ... Meillä on nyt ... Niinku tää bläck outti tässä päällä ... Black outti ! Sanoi kapteeni

Takeltelua kirjoitti:

Ei me voita antta niitä kun tuota ... Meillä on nyt ... Niinku tää bläck outti tässä päällä ... Black outti ! Sanoi kapteeni

Tää Avo Piht vietiin Turkuun elossa mutta katosi mystisesti! Suomal sh t näkivät äijän elossa ja pari muuta!

Nato vei kirjoitti:

Tää Avo Piht vietiin Turkuun elossa mutta katosi mystisesti! Suomal sh t näkivät äijän elossa ja pari muuta!

Minua hirvittää että TAAS ON NATOLAIVAT TÄÄLLÄ älkää lenntäkö tai risteillä

Iskuja tulee kirjoitti:

Minua hirvittää että TAAS ON NATOLAIVAT TÄÄLLÄ älkää lenntäkö tai risteillä

NE EIVÄT OLE TURHAAN TÄÄLLÄ !!!!

Huomio varoitus kirjoitti:

NE EIVÄT OLE TURHAAN TÄÄLLÄ !!!!

Turhaan aivan turhaan. Laalalaa