Brittiläinen tähtitoimittaja Peter Oborne on vastikään viettänyt viikon Aleppossa ja on hämmästynyt. Lähes jokaikinen paikallinen asetti hänelle kysymyksen: "Miksi Länsi tukee FSA:n brutaaleita terroristeja?"
Eikös juuri FSA:n pitänyt olla niitä maltillisia?
Eikös juuri FSA:n pitänyt olla niitä maltillisia?
Vastaukset 5
Vanhimmat
Niin kuin Bush sanoi:
"Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. It's the same thing, either way."
Magee juttu, onko tästä linkkiä.
Tässä yksi linkki.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/aleppo-notebook-the-citys-terrorist-besiegers-will-now-be-besieged/
Again and again I was asked: why is Britain supporting the terrorists? Western media rightly emphasise Assad’s atrocities. But the Aleppans I spoke to regularly pointed out that under Assad’s regime women can walk alone down the street and pursue a career; that a broadly liberal curriculum is taught in the schools; that Christians can worship at their churches and Muslims in their mosques. These Aleppans have lived under siege from groups hellbent on the imposition of a mutant version of Wahhabi Islam. They know that many of their fighters are foreigners whose ambition, encouraged by Turkish and Saudi sponsors, is to extinguish Aleppo’s tolerant culture and drive every last Christian out of the city. These Aleppans have a point. When the history of the Syrian civil war is finally written, historians will indeed have to confront the question: why has it been British government policy to turn the ancient city of Aleppo into present-day Kandahar?
Niin. Mitä pirua CIA oikein tekee Syyriassa?
Yrittävät luoda "demokratiaa" Saudiarabian ja Turkin avustuksella?