Alkuperäisessä tekstissä View of Hebrewsin kirjoittaja on Ethan Smith. Tässä
linkissä on lisätietoja ja verrataan Mormonin kirjaa ja Views of the Hebrews kirjoja ja niistä olevia todisteita.
http://en.fairmormon.org/Criticism_of_Mormonism/Online_documents/Letter_to_a_CES_Director/Book_of_Mormon_Concerns_&_Questions#Response_to_claim:_.22.27View_of_the_Hebrews.27_compared_to_the_Book_of_Mormon.22
Mm. näin:
Question: Could Joseph Smith have used Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews as a guideline for creating the Book of Mormon?
Criticisms related to View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon
It is claimed that a 19th century work by Ethan Smith, View of the Hebrews, provided source material for Joseph Smith's construction of the Book of Mormon.
Some also postulate a link between Ethan Smith and Oliver Cowdery, since both men lived in Poultney, Vermont while Smith served as the pastor of the church that Oliver Cowdery's family attended at the time that View of the Hebrews was being written.
Many of the criticisms proposed are based upon B. H. Roberts' list of parallels, which only had validity if one applied a hemispheric geography model to the Book of Mormon
The View of the Hebrews theory is yet another attempt to fit a secular origin to the Book of Mormon. Many of the criticisms proposed are based upon B. H. Roberts' list of parallels, which only had validity if one applied a hemispheric geography model to the Book of Mormon. There are a significant number of differences between the two books, which are easily discovered upon reading Ethan Smith's work. Many points that Ethan Smith thought were important are not mentioned at all in the Book of Mormon, and many of the "parallels" are no longer valid based upon current scholarship.[249]
Advocates of the Ethan Smith theory must also explain why Joseph, the ostensible forger, had the chutzpah to point out the source of his forgery. They must also explain why, if Joseph found this evidence so compelling, he did not exploit it for use in the Book of Mormon text itself, since the Book of Mormon contains no reference to the many "unparallels" that Ethan assured his readers virtually guaranteed a Hebrew connection to the Amerindians.
linkissä on lisätietoja ja verrataan Mormonin kirjaa ja Views of the Hebrews kirjoja ja niistä olevia todisteita.
http://en.fairmormon.org/Criticism_of_Mormonism/Online_documents/Letter_to_a_CES_Director/Book_of_Mormon_Concerns_&_Questions#Response_to_claim:_.22.27View_of_the_Hebrews.27_compared_to_the_Book_of_Mormon.22
Mm. näin:
Question: Could Joseph Smith have used Ethan Smith's View of the Hebrews as a guideline for creating the Book of Mormon?
Criticisms related to View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon
It is claimed that a 19th century work by Ethan Smith, View of the Hebrews, provided source material for Joseph Smith's construction of the Book of Mormon.
Some also postulate a link between Ethan Smith and Oliver Cowdery, since both men lived in Poultney, Vermont while Smith served as the pastor of the church that Oliver Cowdery's family attended at the time that View of the Hebrews was being written.
Many of the criticisms proposed are based upon B. H. Roberts' list of parallels, which only had validity if one applied a hemispheric geography model to the Book of Mormon
The View of the Hebrews theory is yet another attempt to fit a secular origin to the Book of Mormon. Many of the criticisms proposed are based upon B. H. Roberts' list of parallels, which only had validity if one applied a hemispheric geography model to the Book of Mormon. There are a significant number of differences between the two books, which are easily discovered upon reading Ethan Smith's work. Many points that Ethan Smith thought were important are not mentioned at all in the Book of Mormon, and many of the "parallels" are no longer valid based upon current scholarship.[249]
Advocates of the Ethan Smith theory must also explain why Joseph, the ostensible forger, had the chutzpah to point out the source of his forgery. They must also explain why, if Joseph found this evidence so compelling, he did not exploit it for use in the Book of Mormon text itself, since the Book of Mormon contains no reference to the many "unparallels" that Ethan assured his readers virtually guaranteed a Hebrew connection to the Amerindians.
Vastaukset 5
Vanhimmat
Olet Tapani huvittava. Aiemmin lainasit mormoneja:
"View of the Hebrews jäljitteli Mormonin kirjaa. Sen kirjoittaja pyrki kirkon johtajaksi Joseph Smithin kuoleman jälkeen."
Kun huomautin asian olevan täyttä puppua, kommentoit, että oho, nähtävästi moka, olen huomauttanut kirjoittajille.
Tuossahan sanotaan selvästi, että kyse oli jäljitelmästä. Nyt sitten etsit pää punaisena mormonien kirjoituksen, jonka mukaan kyse ei olekaan jäljitelmästä, kun sinulle paljastui, että kumpi on kirjoitettu ensin.
Edes hiukan lähdekritiikkiä, pliis.
Miten niin selvästi?
Tästä sain väärän käsityksen: "Sen kirjoittaja pyrki kirkon johtajaksi Joseph Smithin kuoleman jälkeen." Huomautin siitä kääntäjälle enkä kirjoittajille.
Et siis huomauttanut, että Ethan Smith kirjoitti View of the Hebrewsin ennen kuin Joseph Smith kirjoitti MK:n? Kummallista, kun ottaa huomioon, että se oli paljon suurempi virhe, koska väite oli, että Ethan olisi kopioinut Josephilta.
Kyl' vaan huomautin.
Eihän Mormonin kirja ole kokonaan kopioitu View of the Hebrews kirjasta, onhan siinä lainauksia raamatustakin ja sitten suurin osa Joseph Smithin mielikuvituksesta. Kyllähän siinä mielikuvitus laukkaakin kun pitää kasvoja haisevassa vanhassa hatussa. Sen sijaan Abrahamin kirja on kokonaan Smithin mielikuvitusta.