Ompas tuttuja vertauksia ameriikan puolella

Naisasialooser1 kirjoitti:

Key and Lock analogy: It's much harder for a man to find sex than it is for a woman. So a man who can get alot of sex must be doing something right. A woman however...

[–]somecallmenonny 1piste 1päivä sitten 
Key and lock is a stupid and arbitrary analogy. It really only works when you already accept the conclusion.
Suppose a pencil sharpener can only sharpen a certain brand of pencil. That's a shitty pencil sharpener. Good pencil sharpeners can sharpen many different pencils, and can sharpen them many, many times before they break.
See? I can point at a pair of objects where one fits into the other, too! And look at the completely different conclusion I drew from them!
And as for little inconveniences, I'm talking about actual medical conditions that actually fuck up people's bodies. Have you ever gone to the ER with a gallbladder attack and been told "eh, it's probably just your hormones" and got sent home with nothing? That happened to my sister. My brother went to the same ER with a gallbladder attack, they immediately gave him morphine. Morphine. Because a gallbladder attack is one of the 10/10 pains.
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]GreatLoadsOfFunNo longer incel, Still hate normies though[S] 2pistettä 1päivä sitten 

Suppose a pencil sharpener can only sharpen a certain brand of pencil. That's a shitty pencil sharpener. Good pencil sharpeners can sharpen many different pencils, and can sharpen them many, many times before they break.
But with women the more dicks she takes the less valuable she is on the market
For men it's the opposite, women seem to view men who have been with more women as attractive and virgin men as unattractive
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]somecallmenonny 0pistettä 1päivä sitten 
And those are completely arbitrary social constructs that, in a modern context, have no basis in rationality or reason.
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]GreatLoadsOfFunNo longer incel, Still hate normies though[S] 2pistettä 1päivä sitten 
Would you rather have a new car? Or the same model car for the same price but used?
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]somecallmenonny 1piste 1päivä sitten 
Again with the bullshit analogies based on objects. You know that you're asking a woman, and so the car in this scenario is a man, right?
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]GreatLoadsOfFunNo longer incel, Still hate normies though[S] 2pistettä 1päivä sitten 
No in this scenario the cars are women
used = non-virgin
new = virgin
Not hard to follow along
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]somecallmenonny 1piste 1päivä sitten* 
So why can't the car be a man?
Edit: I remember who you are. Never mind. I'm not gonna talk to you.
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


[–]GreatLoadsOfFunNo longer incel, Still hate normies though[S] 2pistettä 1päivä sitten 
It can be. If you women want to value virgin men over experienced men then so be it
pysyväislinkkiembedisäntä


Käytettyä naista verrataan käytettyyn autoon ihan kuten itsekin olen verrannut, nainen tuossa yrittää säälittävästi änkyttää vastaan. No hän ilmeisesti siis arvostaa aikamiesneitsyttä samalla tavalla kuin uutta autoa käytetyn sijaan. Silloinhan tuo vertaus on toimiva.

Valitettavasti se nyt menee vaan niin, että paljon pannut mies on huomattavasti arvokkaampi kuin neitsytmies, eihän muuten naisetkaan täällä miehiä neitsyydestään haukkuisi. Saaminen nostaa miehen statusta ja antaminen halventaa naista.

kirjoitti:

Anonyymi

Kirjoita kommentti

5000

Lähetä