Tässä on koptilaisen kirjoittajan havaintoja Koraanin alkuperästä:
http://www.copticchurch.org/English_spiritual_articles/Islam.htm
Eli Vanha ja Uutta Testamenttia myös juutalaisen kansasatujen ja varhaikristillisten harhaoppien läpi suodatettuna.
http://www.copticchurch.org/English_spiritual_articles/Islam.htm
Eli Vanha ja Uutta Testamenttia myös juutalaisen kansasatujen ja varhaikristillisten harhaoppien läpi suodatettuna.
Vastaukset 3
Vanhimmat
a Christian can go with lying. May God give you what you deserve. Amiin.
sillä joka kirjoitti linkistä löytyvän tekstin. Ei henkilö voi syyttää valehtelijaksi, jos hän viittaa jonkun toisen teksteihin. UUNO!
Following Wansbrough's lead, they decided to look at the Koran as a literary text, to compare it to other devotional writings of the period and to look at internal clues to its origin. They found that it owed much to Judaism, especially the Talmud, a collection of commentaries and interpretations of the Hebrew Bible. They concluded, tentatively, that in the form that survives, the Koran was compiled, if not written, decades after the time of Mohammad, probably by converts to Islam in the Middle East, who introduced elements from the religions previously dominant in the region. Patricia Crone and Michael Cook, also working at SOAS at the time, provided an even more devastating analysis by looking at the only surviving contemporary accounts of the Islamic invasion, written in Armenian, Greek, Aramaic and Syriac by Middle Eastern witnesses to the rise of Islam. They found that Islam, as represented by admittedly biased sources, was in essence a tribal conspiracy against the Byzantine and Persian empires with deep roots in Judaism, and that Arabs and Jews were allies in these conquering communities.
Apparent support for their conclusions came from finds made during the restoration of the Great Mosque of Sana'a in Yemen, where labourers working in the roof discovered fragments of Korans that are among the oldest in existence. German scholars who studied the manuscripts discovered that some of the Koranic writing diverges from the authorised version, which by tradition is considered the pure, unadulterated word of God. What's more, some of the writing appears to have been inscribed over earlier, "rubbed-out" versions of the text. This editing supports the belief of Wansbrough and his pupils that the Koran as we know it does not date from the time of Mohammad. Andrew Rippin, professor of Islamic history at the University of Victoria in Canada, and the author of a revisionist history of Islam published by Routledge, said: "The Sana'a manuscripts [are] part of the process of filling in the holes in our knowledge of what might have happened."
http://www.newstatesman.com/200112100017