Holy fuck, yes there is no money, except for bailouts and the EU.
Also everyone nowadays has his life financed by each other. An economy that tries to paint the picture of people "earning their right to live" or something is completely besides the material reality. What is important is, that certain stuff gets done. But a "job" nowaday is just something you climb onto like a makeshift raft after a ship sunk, and as soon as you're on it, you begin to kick the people that also want to get on.
There are so many jobs, especially in our modern society of services instead of production, that could easily be argued away as nonsensical and "not worth what they are paid". Money circulates between those jobs, paying for each other for stuff that isn't essential, while the real values are imported from elsewhere, where they will be falling into the same traps in maybe two generations.
There is no moral, ethical or even material value in the phrase "get a job" any more. And the "there is no money" is just as stupid. Money on a grand scale is about our ressources as a whole and power gets distributed. Money is just representing material values and the work done by services, i.e. cultural power - and concerning them we actually should have the means to have more of that than ever before. We are just living in a stupidly inefficent system, a corrupted once free market, and an equally corrupt state. That holds true for almos all western societies today.
It is taken away from students and invested in large ventures, that will probably end up taking it and leaving us behind. Bailouts, EU, prestige projects. Why shouldn't the students protest? And of course they will destroy mostly senselessly, because there is no evil, just the basic dynamics of our times.
"Just doing our job", is the choir of our times, and we will all go down singing it, from the leader so the slaves.
Also everyone nowadays has his life financed by each other. An economy that tries to paint the picture of people "earning their right to live" or something is completely besides the material reality. What is important is, that certain stuff gets done. But a "job" nowaday is just something you climb onto like a makeshift raft after a ship sunk, and as soon as you're on it, you begin to kick the people that also want to get on.
There are so many jobs, especially in our modern society of services instead of production, that could easily be argued away as nonsensical and "not worth what they are paid". Money circulates between those jobs, paying for each other for stuff that isn't essential, while the real values are imported from elsewhere, where they will be falling into the same traps in maybe two generations.
There is no moral, ethical or even material value in the phrase "get a job" any more. And the "there is no money" is just as stupid. Money on a grand scale is about our ressources as a whole and power gets distributed. Money is just representing material values and the work done by services, i.e. cultural power - and concerning them we actually should have the means to have more of that than ever before. We are just living in a stupidly inefficent system, a corrupted once free market, and an equally corrupt state. That holds true for almos all western societies today.
It is taken away from students and invested in large ventures, that will probably end up taking it and leaving us behind. Bailouts, EU, prestige projects. Why shouldn't the students protest? And of course they will destroy mostly senselessly, because there is no evil, just the basic dynamics of our times.
"Just doing our job", is the choir of our times, and we will all go down singing it, from the leader so the slaves.
Vastaukset 6
Vanhimmat
Dear Cock man, I don't understand you...
Teksti on osittain irti viitekehyksestään joka oli englannin opiskelijamellakat..
Mutta tuossa on erittäin pätevä näkemys nykyiseen työelämään ja sen konkreettiseen sisällöttömyyteen - sekä rahaan ja siihen mitä se nykyisin on ja mitä se ei ole.
Tekstin on kirjoittanut laajasti marxilaisuutta, kapitalismia, anarkismia ja monia muita aatesuuntia neutraalisti tutkinut henkilö joka pyrkii näkemään asiat "niinkuin ne ovat".
Tärkeä huomio on : Raha on enemmän sidoksissa valtasuhteisiin kuin se on sidoksissa talouteen.
Kamala kirjoitus. Ajautuu aina umpikujaan. Noh, mitäs nyt.
Jäljellä on siis hmmm.. täytyy miettiä.
Onko englanti muka sallittua tällä foorumilla ja MIKSI sinä et laittanut tekstiisi lähdettä? Aloitukseen lainaamasi teksti itsessään oli ruikutusta ilman mitään argumenttia, ilman ja ei siis mitään(!) argumenttia, mutta ehkä tuon ( tässä minulle valitettavan tuntemattomaksi jäävän) tekstistä niitä puuttuvia osiahan sinä varmasti unohditkin copy-pastettaa, eikö niin (??)...
Pikkunen vinkki: jos haluat ja haet edes alkeellista kunnioitusta lukijaltasi, saat sen ilmoittamalla lähteen, mikäli käytät muuta kuin omaa tekstintuottoasi, kuten tuossa.
Tekstiin ei pysty laittamaan lähdettä koska alkuperäinen on jo tuhoutunut useita tunteja sitten. Tämä on siis internet-reliikki, vastaa kuolleen meren kirjakääröjä ja ainoa tapa säilyttää kyseinen teksti. Digitaalista perimätietoa.
Tiedon validaation voi tehdä myös ajattelemalla jos sellaista hyvettä harrastaa.
Lisäksi wikipedian käyttö lisää ainakin 20 pojoa älykkyyteen kunhan muistaa lähdekritiikin eikä vouhota.
Chutzpah.
Joten lähde on tämä:
http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/node/9528007