Men and women clearly have different strategies for picking sexual partners, but the reason why differences exist is less clear. The classic explanation for these differences has been that men and women’ brains have evolved to make certain choices, but a new study in Psychological Science, a publication of the Association for Psychological Science, suggests that evolution is only part of the answer.
To be a ‘success’ in evolutionary terms, women need to have access to resources for raising offspring, and men need to have access to fertile females. Researchers have argued that women tend to prefer partners who have an ability to invest resources in their children (i.e., wealthy men), and men tend to prefer partners who appear fertile (i.e., young women) because evolutionary adaptations have programmed these preferences in our brains.
But in the modern world, ‘success’ is not necessarily tied to offspring, so researchers Marcel Zentner and Klaudia Mitura of the University of York in the UK hypothesised that the influence of evolutionary biases on mate choice would decline proportionally with nations’ gender parity, or the equality between men and women.
How the study was done
“There was accumulating evidence that gender differences in mental abilities, such as math performance, vanish in gender-equal societies,” said Zentner. But he and his fellow researchers wanted to see if they could observe the same trend for selecting sexual partners.
Zentner and Mitura had 3 177 respondents complete an online mate preference survey from 10 countries ranking from a low (Finland) to a high (Turkey) gender gap in terms of the Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) – a measure that was recently introduced by World Economic Forum to iron out shortcomings of earlier gender parity measures. The participants were asked in their native language whether certain criteria – such as financial prospects and being a good cook – were important considerations when choosing a mate.
They found that the gender difference in mate preferences predicted by evolutionary psychology models “is highest in gender-unequal societies, and smallest in the most gender-equal societies,” according to Zentner.
Confirmed results in study
These results were confirmed in a second study based on mate preferences reported by 8 953 volunteers from 31 nations. Again, Zentner and Mitura found that there were fewer differences between men and women’s preferences in more gender-equal nations compared to less gender-equal nations.
Because increasing gender equality reduces gender differences in mate selection, these studies indicate that the strategies men and women use to choose mates may not be as hardwired as scientists originally thought.
“These findings challenge the idea proposed by some evolutionary psychologists that gender differences in mate-preferences are determined by evolved adaptations that became biologically embedded in the male and female brain,” says Zentner. But he also adds evolutionary roots shouldn’t be ruled out entirely.
“Indeed, the capacity to change behaviours and attitudes relatively quickly in response to societal changes may itself be driven by an evolutionary program that rewards flexibility over rigidity.”
http://www.health24.com/news/Man/1-926,76491.asp
Eli siis tasa-arvo lisää valinnan monimuotoisuutta....tämänhän kaikki normaalit ihmiset jo tiesivätkin. Palstan pahvipäät : Joko riittää ?????
To be a ‘success’ in evolutionary terms, women need to have access to resources for raising offspring, and men need to have access to fertile females. Researchers have argued that women tend to prefer partners who have an ability to invest resources in their children (i.e., wealthy men), and men tend to prefer partners who appear fertile (i.e., young women) because evolutionary adaptations have programmed these preferences in our brains.
But in the modern world, ‘success’ is not necessarily tied to offspring, so researchers Marcel Zentner and Klaudia Mitura of the University of York in the UK hypothesised that the influence of evolutionary biases on mate choice would decline proportionally with nations’ gender parity, or the equality between men and women.
How the study was done
“There was accumulating evidence that gender differences in mental abilities, such as math performance, vanish in gender-equal societies,” said Zentner. But he and his fellow researchers wanted to see if they could observe the same trend for selecting sexual partners.
Zentner and Mitura had 3 177 respondents complete an online mate preference survey from 10 countries ranking from a low (Finland) to a high (Turkey) gender gap in terms of the Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) – a measure that was recently introduced by World Economic Forum to iron out shortcomings of earlier gender parity measures. The participants were asked in their native language whether certain criteria – such as financial prospects and being a good cook – were important considerations when choosing a mate.
They found that the gender difference in mate preferences predicted by evolutionary psychology models “is highest in gender-unequal societies, and smallest in the most gender-equal societies,” according to Zentner.
Confirmed results in study
These results were confirmed in a second study based on mate preferences reported by 8 953 volunteers from 31 nations. Again, Zentner and Mitura found that there were fewer differences between men and women’s preferences in more gender-equal nations compared to less gender-equal nations.
Because increasing gender equality reduces gender differences in mate selection, these studies indicate that the strategies men and women use to choose mates may not be as hardwired as scientists originally thought.
“These findings challenge the idea proposed by some evolutionary psychologists that gender differences in mate-preferences are determined by evolved adaptations that became biologically embedded in the male and female brain,” says Zentner. But he also adds evolutionary roots shouldn’t be ruled out entirely.
“Indeed, the capacity to change behaviours and attitudes relatively quickly in response to societal changes may itself be driven by an evolutionary program that rewards flexibility over rigidity.”
http://www.health24.com/news/Man/1-926,76491.asp
Eli siis tasa-arvo lisää valinnan monimuotoisuutta....tämänhän kaikki normaalit ihmiset jo tiesivätkin. Palstan pahvipäät : Joko riittää ?????
Vastaukset 3
Vanhimmat
Jaahas TAAS KERRAN poistettiin aloitukseni jossa kirjoitin että jos naisten ainut kriteeri olisi munan koko, olisi parisuhteet onnellisempia. Ei siitä enempää (mutta olisi liittynyt aiheeseen)
Tuossahan sanotaan että kriteerit parille on sitä samanlaisemmat mitä tasa-arvoisemmassa asemassa naiset ja miehet ovat. Huomioitava että tuo tehtiin jossakin nettideitti-kyselyssä, siellähän ei tule esille se mitä nainen oikeasti haluaa, täällä tosielämässä huomataan että naiset haluaa sen kusipäärentun vaikka asiallisiakin miehiä olisi tarjolla. Tästäkin olin avannut omiin kokemuksiini perustuvan ketjun mutta SEKIN POISTETTIIN.
On se munan koko ja suhteen laatu -keskustelu tuolla toisaalla: http://keskustelu.suomi24.fi/node/10902225
Onko valinnan monimuotoisuus hyvä asia? Mille tai kenelle? Mitä siitä mitä tasa-arvo tekee? Miten tämä tieto siis auttaa ketään elämässään kohti maalia eli seksiä ja parisuhdetta?