Super Hornet on epäonnistunut kone

Flanker pesee Super Hornetin 6-0:

"Sukhoi Flanker vs the Super Hornet

In assessing the Flanker against the Super Hornet it is clear from the outset that the advantage in firepower, speed, raw agility, range and manoeuvre performance goes to the Flanker. Given that operational Flankers span variants from B through H, and type designations from Su-27S, through Su-30s to Su-35s, there are a wide range of configurations possible.

This has been further complicated by the Russian propensity to customise configurations for clients, and perform ongoing technology upgrades to operational variants. Another byproduct of Russian marketing is that the label Su-30 spans an upgraded Su-27SKM (Su-30KI) up to the Indian Su-30MKI, which uses extensive ly features demonstrated in the Su-37.

In terms of aerodynamic performance the Flanker sits broadly in the class of the F-15 family, with similar thrust / weight ratios at similar weights. The empty weight of Flanker variants ranges between 37,240 - 40,800 lb and internal fuel capacities between 20,750 - 22,600 lb.

At this time all production Flankers are flying with variants of the Saturn/Salyut Al-31F, which deliver static sea level thrust ratings in the 27 klb to 32 klb class, depending on the variant. This engine is comparable to the latest P&W F100 and GE F110 series engines, outperforming the smaller F404 series. In terms of supersonic speed, supersonic and subsonic acceleration and climb performance, the Super Hornet cannot compete with any Flanker variant.

High speed turning performance, where thrust limited, also goes to the Flanker, as does supersonic manoeuvre performance. The Super Hornet is severely handicapped by its lower combat thrust/weight ratio, and hybrid wing planform. It is worth observing that high alpha trim drag and pitch rates of the canard equipped Flanker variants, such as the Su-33 and Su-30MKI, will be superior to the versions without canards.

In summary, the Flanker outperforms the Super Hornet decisively in aerodynamic performance. What advantage the Super Hornet now has in the APG-79 radar will vanish in coming years as Russian AESAs emerge. The one area in which the Flanker currently trails the Super Hornet is in radar signature (stealth) performance. The Super Hornet has inlet geometry shaping, inlet tunnel S-bends, and an AESA shroud all of which reduce its forward sector signature well below that of the Flanker.

In the short term, this is an advantage the Super Hornet retains, with the caveat that external stores put hard limits on signature improvement for the Super Hornet. However, Russian researchers have done some excellent work over the last decade in absorbent materials and laminate techniques for radar signature reduction, which offer the potential for the Flanker to achieve similar signature reduction to the F/A-18E/F. If funded, a reduced signature Flanker is feasible in the next half decade.

In conclusion, the Flanker in all current variants kinematically outclasses the Super Hornet in all high performance flight regimes. The only near term advantage the latest Super Hornets have over legacy Flanker variants is in the APG-79 AESA and radar signature reduction features, an advantage which will not last long given highly active ongoing Russian development effort in these areas. The supercruising Al-41F engine will further widen the performance gap in favour of the Flanker. What this means is that post 2010 the Super Hornet is uncompetitive against advanced Flankers in BVR combat, as it is now uncompetitive in close combat."

http://www.ausairpower.net/DT-SuperBug-vs-Flanker.html

Tässä vastinetta..

Swedens Saab Gripen NG JAS 39 fighter jet SHOOTS DOWN a Russian Sukhoi Su-35 in Marketing video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9J72JqMyE8&list=PLAMdv4iZS-esI0DKwSaxoidNF_yW_2eoa

Onko nämä vanhat tiedot pakko laittaa monesti tänne..?

Amerikkalaiset koneet ovat epäilyttäviä teknisesti, ja täysin varmasti liian kalliita ostaa ja käyttää. Pienen maan olennaisin kysymys on optimoida tehon ja hinnan suhde. Jenkkikoneet eivät tarjoa erityistä lisäystä suoritukykyyn nähden siihen miten paljon kalliimpia ne ovat kaiken kaikkiaan.

Paska mikä paska. Ei jatkoon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk6Qr6OO5Xo

meille noita

VW Transporterit olisivat parhaat koska niillä kulkisi arabiukkojen laukutkin hyvin :D

Flanker on varikkoruusu. Täysin vnhnaikainen ja kallis huoltaa. Perustuu koiratappelu-taktiikkaan. SH ampuu sen alas 100 km päästä.

Paras ilmapuolustus meille olisi ilmamiinat. Heti kun ilmavalvojan puhelimesta sä-
rähtäisi hälytys maanaliseen jehukeskukseen nousisi ilmoihin sanotaan vaikka tuhat
heliumilla täytettyä 200 l. kierrätys jätesäkkiä maamme tärkeimmissä kohteissa. Kun
vihulaisen suihkuhävittäjät posauttaisivat läpi niin ilmanottoaukoista virtaava heeli-
um saisi pilotit pikkuoraviksi ja lentäjät nauraisivat itsensä tärviölle ja tarkkuus itse
tuhotouhuun herpaantuisi. Tätä sietää miettiä. ;)

Super hornet 70 kpl, noista growlereita 16 kpl. Growler täräyttää Migeiltä ja Sukhoilta tutkat sekä viestiyhteydet pois pelistä. Samoin maatutkat muuttuvat tehottomiksi.