Eräästä aihettä käsittelevästä jyytubevideosta nappasin tämän, se sisältää paljon tuttuja termejä valkoritarista hypergamiaan eli ameriikoissa ajatellaan ihan samalla tavalla. Yksi erittäin paha virhe kommentissa on, nimittäin 45 pitäisi olla 25
Not to whiteknight you but I'm glad you realize this. Whenever you're rejecting a guy (you probably do this 5-20 times a day), think hard about why. I bet you, 9 times out of 10, it's because he doesn't have enough LOOKS. Now, you probably reason that "he was creepy", "his personality was bad", "no charisma", but this is all NEGATIVE HALO EFFECT - "The Failo Effect". You associate negative feelings and behaviours to him because he doesn't meet your sky-high looks requirements as a hypergamous female with 100s of dating options. As a female under the age of 45, you literally can afford to pick and choose who you DATE ON whatever whim you wish. You could date one new guy every 3 hours if you wanted.
Not to whiteknight you but I'm glad you realize this. Whenever you're rejecting a guy (you probably do this 5-20 times a day), think hard about why. I bet you, 9 times out of 10, it's because he doesn't have enough LOOKS. Now, you probably reason that "he was creepy", "his personality was bad", "no charisma", but this is all NEGATIVE HALO EFFECT - "The Failo Effect". You associate negative feelings and behaviours to him because he doesn't meet your sky-high looks requirements as a hypergamous female with 100s of dating options. As a female under the age of 45, you literally can afford to pick and choose who you DATE ON whatever whim you wish. You could date one new guy every 3 hours if you wanted.
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Eipä taida palstan vakikirjoittajat olla tuosta neljänkymmenenviiden vuoden rajapyykistä ihan samaa mieltä.