Pidätkö enemmän räjähdyksistä vai runoista

"What is a man,
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? a beast, no more.
Sure, he that made us with such large discourse,
Looking before and after, gave us not
That capability and god-like reason
To fust in us unused. Now, whether it be
Bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple
Of thinking too precisely on the event,
A thought which, quarter'd, hath but one part wisdom
And ever three parts coward, I do not know
Why yet I live to say 'This thing's to do;'
Sith I have cause and will and strength and means
To do't. Examples gross as earth exhort me:
Witness this army of such mass and charge
Led by a delicate and tender prince,
Whose spirit with divine ambition puff'd
Makes mouths at the invisible event,
Exposing what is mortal and unsure
To all that fortune, death and danger dare,
Even for an egg-shell. Rightly to be great
Is not to stir without great argument,
But greatly to find quarrel in a straw
When honour's at the stake."


Oih.

http://www.online-literature.com/shakespeare/hamlet/


En oo varmaan ikinä nauranut yhtä paljon ku Hamletia ekaa kertaa lukiessani. Aivan vitun loistavaa tekstiä, puhdasta Neroutta, niinku sienipäissään kirjoittanut koko homman. Ei voi muuta ku

Kyllä mä runoista pidän ja mahdollisimman elämänmakuisista. :-) laulutkin on runoja, joten raadollisempi runo musiikkiin hunnutettuna.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_0q12kKH-A&feature=related

räjähdys, ei tarvi miettiä ees muuta. muutenki kaikki sellainen voimakas; tuli, liekit, verenpunainen, salamat, raju tunteenpurkaus, voima...