Phil Jones tuskastunut climate Audittiin

ja menee WMO kokoukseen oikaisemaan asian, missä petterikin saa uudet ohjeen.
Ja koska alkoi spämmäys siirryn nasun baariin, jatkoa ei tipu tänne.
Kiittäköön alleri asiasta.

http://nasu.blogit.kauppalehti.fi/blog/15556#109874

From: Phil Jones [[1]REDACTEDREDACTED]
Sent: 07 September 2009 14:39
To: Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC)
Subject: RE: Climate change research

Bruce,
REDACTEDI don't think many of them look at it. They are mostly people
who correspond on the Climate Audit blog site. They all seem to
have infinite time as they are all retired.
This is another issue. All people working in the field have day to day jobs
to do and don't want to spend evenings going on blog sites trying to
put people right.
Cheers
Phil
At 14:13 07/09/2009, you wrote:
Thanks Phil

Not very nice. Whats all this about? Who are these people who sign this?

Bruce
___________________________________________________________________________________

From: Phil Jones [ [2]REDACTEDREDACTED]
Sent: 07 September 2009 09:40
To: Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC); Deborah Wargate
Cc: Goodess Clare Dr (ENV)
Subject: RE: Climate change research

Deborah, Bruce,
REDACTEDI'd just ignore the skeptics if I were you. I received the attached whilst I was
away. I also got a hard copy as well as the letters this person sent to Gordon
Brown and to the Pope!
I send it as I noticed that Hans Schroder is on the list from the UK - at the end.
The letter was also sent to numerous others including the American Geophysical
Union. They sent it on to me and they are going to ignore it as well.
As I said there is no point debating with these people. It is just time wasting.
I have tried to engage with them in the past, but they refuse to listen or read
anything I
send them.
REDACTEDAs an aside, I'm on two WMO committees and am going to a meeting in Geneva
next week. Also UK government decisions are not based on the basis of CRU data!

REDACTEDThese people get their information from blog sites such as Climate Audit.
Cheers
Phil
At 11:45 01/09/2009, Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC) wrote:
Deborah
053
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset

Vanhimmat

Ei vielä vastauksia

Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.

Ketjusta on poistettu 1 sääntöjenvastainen viesti.

Kommentoi aloitusta


Sähköteurastaja kirjoitti:

ja menee WMO kokoukseen oikaisemaan asian, missä petterikin saa uudet ohjeen.
Ja koska alkoi spämmäys siirryn nasun baariin, jatkoa ei tipu tänne.
Kiittäköön alleri asiasta.

http://nasu.blogit.kauppalehti.fi/blog/15556#109874

From: Phil Jones [[1]REDACTEDREDACTED]
Sent: 07 September 2009 14:39
To: Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC)
Subject: RE: Climate change research

Bruce,
REDACTEDI don't think many of them look at it. They are mostly people
who correspond on the Climate Audit blog site. They all seem to
have infinite time as they are all retired.
This is another issue. All people working in the field have day to day jobs
to do and don't want to spend evenings going on blog sites trying to
put people right.
Cheers
Phil
At 14:13 07/09/2009, you wrote:
Thanks Phil

Not very nice. Whats all this about? Who are these people who sign this?

Bruce
___________________________________________________________________________________

From: Phil Jones [ [2]REDACTEDREDACTED]
Sent: 07 September 2009 09:40
To: Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC); Deborah Wargate
Cc: Goodess Clare Dr (ENV)
Subject: RE: Climate change research

Deborah, Bruce,
REDACTEDI'd just ignore the skeptics if I were you. I received the attached whilst I was
away. I also got a hard copy as well as the letters this person sent to Gordon
Brown and to the Pope!
I send it as I noticed that Hans Schroder is on the list from the UK - at the end.
The letter was also sent to numerous others including the American Geophysical
Union. They sent it on to me and they are going to ignore it as well.
As I said there is no point debating with these people. It is just time wasting.
I have tried to engage with them in the past, but they refuse to listen or read
anything I
send them.
REDACTEDAs an aside, I'm on two WMO committees and am going to a meeting in Geneva
next week. Also UK government decisions are not based on the basis of CRU data!

REDACTEDThese people get their information from blog sites such as Climate Audit.
Cheers
Phil
At 11:45 01/09/2009, Tofield Bruce Dr (LCIC) wrote:
Deborah

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu