JUNK-SCIENCE INDEX
Professor Glantz's Lancet article
I am just holding this temporarily because some
browsers are unable to access The Lancet site.
Professor Glantz has written a superb expose of
how science corruption was organised in the
tobacco industry, but in my opinion he has missed
the point that it was far more widespread than
this.
You will note that all of those listed below in
corrupting the chemical industry sciences and
cellphones, are also the names listed in the
tobacco documents.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Q&A INDEX with threads to documentary proof
See also the Philip Morris documents themselves
and search for these names: APCO TASSC NPL
CARLO,G CARLO,GL AUCHTER,T SELTZER,C
VALIS,W MBE CURE GEP WHITECOATS (Note use
of uppercase, and variations on names [with no
spaces]
With these names and acronyms you'll only begin
to touch the tip of the iceberg of evidence now
emerging as to how these shonks, PR people and
corporate lobbyists took over the definition of
scientific proof and the regulation of 'risk'
standards.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Steve Milloy and other Junkscience Spin Doctors
In this dodgy world of science-for-sale there are
two basic types of operators. Those on the PR end
of the slimy scale, and those on the science and
research end. This article looks at the Spin
Doctors of Junkscience.
If you are only interested in Steve Milloy's
junkscience background, look here.
TASSC and other tobacco-industry ploys
See who funded Milloy's TASSC operations in this
APCO memo site.
Manipulation of the Dioxin Debate
The way the Chlorine Institute and the American
Paper Institute manipulated the dioxin debate
Also a piece on National Public Radio's treatment
of the story.
What's the truth behind the Alar scare?
The big Apple scare of a few years ago is used by
some industry flaks as evidence of irresponsible
activist scare-mongering. But there's more to the
story than this.
How the Press Agencies handle EMF studies
This is now a world which gets most of its
international newspaper news through a couple of
press agencies -- mainly Reuters and AAP. These
organisations also distribute press-releases, and
obviously for a price they will mix the two.
Dr George Carlo: This is your life.
A chronology of the most remarkable scientific
administrator of our time. The scientist who is
expert in a thousand fields without every needing
to study; the man who can juggle a thousand
different industry research problems and produce
the results they want.
The Harvard Center for Risk Analysis
This is a commercial offshoot of the Harvard
University's School of Public Health. Over the
years both the School, and the Center have either
directly, or indirectly (via staff) been involved
in many dubious enterprises.
Of Mice and Men
There is so much misinformation being generated
about the Adelaide Hospital (and other) studies,
that this is an attempt to provide a lay-man's
overview of fallacious arguments. It is a good
way to help train your bullshit detector.
My Clash with the Quacks
Daniel Rutter's story of his ongoing battle with
Harmonic Products, and the company's ludicrous
claims about devices which protect you from EMF
effects.
The eyes have it in trivialisation, bimbo-style
CrossRoads column 11 July 1995. The claim was
being made that widespread eye damage was
resulting from the use of computer screens. This
column looked at this load of rubbish run by an
Australian TV current affairs program. The
Channel Seven network in Australia is crazy about
miracle cures, and loves doing a bit of crisis-
mongering on the side to stir up public interest.
Lisää:
http://www.electric-words.com/junk/junkindex.html
Professor Glantz's Lancet article
I am just holding this temporarily because some
browsers are unable to access The Lancet site.
Professor Glantz has written a superb expose of
how science corruption was organised in the
tobacco industry, but in my opinion he has missed
the point that it was far more widespread than
this.
You will note that all of those listed below in
corrupting the chemical industry sciences and
cellphones, are also the names listed in the
tobacco documents.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Q&A INDEX with threads to documentary proof
See also the Philip Morris documents themselves
and search for these names: APCO TASSC NPL
CARLO,G CARLO,GL AUCHTER,T SELTZER,C
VALIS,W MBE CURE GEP WHITECOATS (Note use
of uppercase, and variations on names [with no
spaces]
With these names and acronyms you'll only begin
to touch the tip of the iceberg of evidence now
emerging as to how these shonks, PR people and
corporate lobbyists took over the definition of
scientific proof and the regulation of 'risk'
standards.
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Steve Milloy and other Junkscience Spin Doctors
In this dodgy world of science-for-sale there are
two basic types of operators. Those on the PR end
of the slimy scale, and those on the science and
research end. This article looks at the Spin
Doctors of Junkscience.
If you are only interested in Steve Milloy's
junkscience background, look here.
TASSC and other tobacco-industry ploys
See who funded Milloy's TASSC operations in this
APCO memo site.
Manipulation of the Dioxin Debate
The way the Chlorine Institute and the American
Paper Institute manipulated the dioxin debate
Also a piece on National Public Radio's treatment
of the story.
What's the truth behind the Alar scare?
The big Apple scare of a few years ago is used by
some industry flaks as evidence of irresponsible
activist scare-mongering. But there's more to the
story than this.
How the Press Agencies handle EMF studies
This is now a world which gets most of its
international newspaper news through a couple of
press agencies -- mainly Reuters and AAP. These
organisations also distribute press-releases, and
obviously for a price they will mix the two.
Dr George Carlo: This is your life.
A chronology of the most remarkable scientific
administrator of our time. The scientist who is
expert in a thousand fields without every needing
to study; the man who can juggle a thousand
different industry research problems and produce
the results they want.
The Harvard Center for Risk Analysis
This is a commercial offshoot of the Harvard
University's School of Public Health. Over the
years both the School, and the Center have either
directly, or indirectly (via staff) been involved
in many dubious enterprises.
Of Mice and Men
There is so much misinformation being generated
about the Adelaide Hospital (and other) studies,
that this is an attempt to provide a lay-man's
overview of fallacious arguments. It is a good
way to help train your bullshit detector.
My Clash with the Quacks
Daniel Rutter's story of his ongoing battle with
Harmonic Products, and the company's ludicrous
claims about devices which protect you from EMF
effects.
The eyes have it in trivialisation, bimbo-style
CrossRoads column 11 July 1995. The claim was
being made that widespread eye damage was
resulting from the use of computer screens. This
column looked at this load of rubbish run by an
Australian TV current affairs program. The
Channel Seven network in Australia is crazy about
miracle cures, and loves doing a bit of crisis-
mongering on the side to stir up public interest.
Lisää:
http://www.electric-words.com/junk/junkindex.html
Vastaukset 3
Vanhimmat
taas sama sekopää
Siis minäkö vai se, keneltä olen tosi-asiat
lainannut, ellei... sinäkö?
Yhtyen edelliseen, sinä olet sekopää, mene hoitoon