'Mostly unknown' doesn't even make sense...
How can a cosmological model be 'mostly unknown'? This simply makes no sense. Regardless of the merits of the word 'rejected', at least it actually tells the readers something. Whereas telling them that the model is 'mostly unknown' is hopelessly vague. Unknown by whom? And what is it that the people that don't know don't know? I suggest that those behind this edit actually consider our readers, who aren't a part of this silly edit war. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:20, 26 November 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plasma_cosmology/Archive_11#.27Mostly_unknown.27_doesn.27t_even_make_sense
:D
How can a cosmological model be 'mostly unknown'? This simply makes no sense. Regardless of the merits of the word 'rejected', at least it actually tells the readers something. Whereas telling them that the model is 'mostly unknown' is hopelessly vague. Unknown by whom? And what is it that the people that don't know don't know? I suggest that those behind this edit actually consider our readers, who aren't a part of this silly edit war. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:20, 26 November 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plasma_cosmology/Archive_11#.27Mostly_unknown.27_doesn.27t_even_make_sense
:D
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
"Mostly unknown"
Tarkoittaa "täyttä roskaa". Edes wikissä asiasta ei ole artikkelia. On vain keskusteluosio, jossa hömelö pääsee purkamaan turhautmistaan.