Jostain syystä ilmastojulistajat ovat keksineet, että ilmakehässä vallitsee ns. kasvihuoneilmiö.
Asiaa on tutkittu jo vuosia sitten ja kovasti näyttää siltä, ettei mitään kasvihuoneilmiötä ole olemassakaan.
Asiasta on tehty tutkimuksia ja alla on niistä eräs.
Tässä tutkimuksen abstrakti ja alla linkki tutkimukseen.
Ja lisäksi kovasti vaadittu DOI.
DOI: 10.1142/S021797920904984X
"The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 degrees Celsius is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified. "
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021797920904984X
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0707.1161.pdf
Asiaa on tutkittu jo vuosia sitten ja kovasti näyttää siltä, ettei mitään kasvihuoneilmiötä ole olemassakaan.
Asiasta on tehty tutkimuksia ja alla on niistä eräs.
Tässä tutkimuksen abstrakti ja alla linkki tutkimukseen.
Ja lisäksi kovasti vaadittu DOI.
DOI: 10.1142/S021797920904984X
"The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier (1824), Tyndall (1861), and Arrhenius (1896), and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 degrees Celsius is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified. "
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021797920904984X
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0707.1161.pdf
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.