True or False

You will find below tomorrow from
pages of www.jannehuttunen.com


Methods

This is a quick preview not to methods itself but the method which I use to
measure the results of a Tornado and Hurricane studies. I will correct this page later.

-   “Theory of Sequences” assumes there are potential gauges    everywhen in nature; on micro,- and macrocosmic levels

-   from timeseries used with UTC can be detected so called
“asynchronic” impulses. This means the time studied must be
streched on a long scale for example centuries, decades and years
   the needed knowledge at first would be from a shorter period

-   asynchronic patterns can be detected of UTC by separating
   similar alike pattren of cycles.

-   when the patterns are separated from the whole.
   The x-horizon line, the UTC must be removed
   because it has proved to be imcompetent measure

-   the x-horizon line of “asynchronic” cycles
   must be replaced by a framework which
   tells the truth and interprets the cycle once again
   to synchronic/regular

-   the dramatic and revolutionary finding was made
   during 2003-2004 of tornadoes when understood
   there were macrocosmic natural phenomenon
   which explained the asynchronic similarities
   detected of over 500 tornadoes during 1950 to 2003
   
-   the macrocosmic natural phenomenon was finded
   by the enstrechment of ecological concept to extraterrestial
   mass.

-   later experimented (revealed in theory when published in a book    or    on these pages) the generality of a phenomenon
   was verified and the impact of a mass to
   tornado was beyond the distance to the target (earth, located by
   3 dimensional coordinates)


-   the masses named like “Altair, Capella,Vega, Procyon, Aldebaran,    Sun, Jupiter, Saturn” are examples of masses which were included    on the study. The study showed the distance did not matter
   to the multiplier strength how it estimated the narrow limits
   of time when tornado did it touchdown on reported area and at    given time, which were often accurate or should have been such
   as it was registered often by official institute.

-   the result gave high multipliers for tornado occurrence
   I remarked by a vasta manually fed reserach over 1000
   multipliers which varied strongly with a minute exact tornado
   incident.

-   the values of the multipliers I included to be meaningful
   showed 1.33 to 4.18 times higher tornado risk to a given time

-   also the safer cycles/ time were shown were nearly equally
   amount of masses and their sequences were
   detected with multipliers verified statistically valid
   methods from 0.67 to 0.05 an zero levels

-   it is evident even a small study like mine which was fed manually
   proved the EWTAS can be built by method of
   accountinh the multipliers together like
   P=Probability of a tornado occurrence
   a,b,c,..n = valid multipliers

   P=a b c..n

   By this I mean EWTAS is built like an laser alarm system
   when you use only one laser beam it equals
   already one parameter which equals e.g. 4,18 time higher
   tornado occurrence

   Would You stay for a two houirs period inside or
   in Yuor tractor in a field when wtaher forecast given
   a months before gives 4 times higher risk
   for a killer-tornado?

   What about when EWTAS calculates with hundreds
   of laser beams used.

   Do You think Tornado can fool such a system?

   I do not think so.


-   the masses of heavens which most naturally forms the ecological    “cell” we live inside affected very remarkable accuracy when    tornadoes did they touchdowns.

-   later in a theory the naturality of why nature does not work in chaos
   but in order is verified and explained. To say here, it is most
   logical to understand the leptons, the protons, the atoms
   does not gather around each others in a chaos
   but because of a physical and natural laws.
   It is inevitably and the verified Tornado, Hurricane and
   other reserches has made me convinced this is a general
   theory.

-   to say masses at heavens to be taken to a framework
   were measured by slicing their orbit to the sequnces
   which were used between 10-10000. The high volumes
   of sequences “the pulverize method” gave an extremely high
   quality information and proved the accuracy would go to
   beyond milliseconds

-   this means everything in this world is detectable, predictable
   and measurable

   At the moment I am waiting a calls to cash in at least
   the Nobel Prize which I see a minimum
   reward for the service.


   Mr. Janne Huttunen in Helsinki 31th August 2005


   








   
0163
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset

Vanhimmat

Ei vielä vastauksia

Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.

Kommentoi aloitusta


You can suggest him a nobel... kirjoitti:

You will find below tomorrow from
pages of www.jannehuttunen.com


Methods

This is a quick preview not to methods itself but the method which I use to
measure the results of a Tornado and Hurricane studies. I will correct this page later.

-   “Theory of Sequences” assumes there are potential gauges    everywhen in nature; on micro,- and macrocosmic levels

-   from timeseries used with UTC can be detected so called
“asynchronic” impulses. This means the time studied must be
streched on a long scale for example centuries, decades and years
   the needed knowledge at first would be from a shorter period

-   asynchronic patterns can be detected of UTC by separating
   similar alike pattren of cycles.

-   when the patterns are separated from the whole.
   The x-horizon line, the UTC must be removed
   because it has proved to be imcompetent measure

-   the x-horizon line of “asynchronic” cycles
   must be replaced by a framework which
   tells the truth and interprets the cycle once again
   to synchronic/regular

-   the dramatic and revolutionary finding was made
   during 2003-2004 of tornadoes when understood
   there were macrocosmic natural phenomenon
   which explained the asynchronic similarities
   detected of over 500 tornadoes during 1950 to 2003
   
-   the macrocosmic natural phenomenon was finded
   by the enstrechment of ecological concept to extraterrestial
   mass.

-   later experimented (revealed in theory when published in a book    or    on these pages) the generality of a phenomenon
   was verified and the impact of a mass to
   tornado was beyond the distance to the target (earth, located by
   3 dimensional coordinates)


-   the masses named like “Altair, Capella,Vega, Procyon, Aldebaran,    Sun, Jupiter, Saturn” are examples of masses which were included    on the study. The study showed the distance did not matter
   to the multiplier strength how it estimated the narrow limits
   of time when tornado did it touchdown on reported area and at    given time, which were often accurate or should have been such
   as it was registered often by official institute.

-   the result gave high multipliers for tornado occurrence
   I remarked by a vasta manually fed reserach over 1000
   multipliers which varied strongly with a minute exact tornado
   incident.

-   the values of the multipliers I included to be meaningful
   showed 1.33 to 4.18 times higher tornado risk to a given time

-   also the safer cycles/ time were shown were nearly equally
   amount of masses and their sequences were
   detected with multipliers verified statistically valid
   methods from 0.67 to 0.05 an zero levels

-   it is evident even a small study like mine which was fed manually
   proved the EWTAS can be built by method of
   accountinh the multipliers together like
   P=Probability of a tornado occurrence
   a,b,c,..n = valid multipliers

   P=a b c..n

   By this I mean EWTAS is built like an laser alarm system
   when you use only one laser beam it equals
   already one parameter which equals e.g. 4,18 time higher
   tornado occurrence

   Would You stay for a two houirs period inside or
   in Yuor tractor in a field when wtaher forecast given
   a months before gives 4 times higher risk
   for a killer-tornado?

   What about when EWTAS calculates with hundreds
   of laser beams used.

   Do You think Tornado can fool such a system?

   I do not think so.


-   the masses of heavens which most naturally forms the ecological    “cell” we live inside affected very remarkable accuracy when    tornadoes did they touchdowns.

-   later in a theory the naturality of why nature does not work in chaos
   but in order is verified and explained. To say here, it is most
   logical to understand the leptons, the protons, the atoms
   does not gather around each others in a chaos
   but because of a physical and natural laws.
   It is inevitably and the verified Tornado, Hurricane and
   other reserches has made me convinced this is a general
   theory.

-   to say masses at heavens to be taken to a framework
   were measured by slicing their orbit to the sequnces
   which were used between 10-10000. The high volumes
   of sequences “the pulverize method” gave an extremely high
   quality information and proved the accuracy would go to
   beyond milliseconds

-   this means everything in this world is detectable, predictable
   and measurable

   At the moment I am waiting a calls to cash in at least
   the Nobel Prize which I see a minimum
   reward for the service.


   Mr. Janne Huttunen in Helsinki 31th August 2005


   








   

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu