Uusi yleisteoria elämästä

ainakin maapallolla kirjoitti:

Hei,

Tornadotutkimuksesta alkaneesta yleisteoriasta
alkaa saapua hiljalleen stilitoiuja ja korjattuja
versioita sivustolle www.jannehuttunen.com
, löydät teoriaa esim. Research Samples ja Theory Samples otsakkeiden alta nyt ja koko loppuvuoiden ajan.

Koska kyse on yleisteoriasta ja aihealue on siis
koko elämä, tulee sivustoille lisää materiaali vähintään vuoden 2006 loppuun asti.

Jos haluat nostaa sivujen tasoa, käy jättämässä
viesti haluatko maksaa 10 euroa tasokkaamasta englanninkielestä ja tyylistä kuin alla.

Kiitos,





Theory Samples/Consumer Version

PART I


- The Theory of Sequences



The Sequantial Theory (in Finnish:
”Jaksollisuuden teoria”) was first
released to media and clientele
under the name of “The Theory of a
Natural Energies”(TONE) on 31st August
2005. It was broadcasted nationally
on the radio in Finland on 8th
September 2005. The first press
release in Finland was to be waited
until 15th September 2005.



The first prototype product from the
theory was EWTAS (Early Warning
Tornado Alarm System). It was
manufactured during yeasr 2003
and 2004. It launchment was holded
until 31st of August when waiting the
theory built from empirical findings
started on extreme weather
phenomenon, such as Tornadoes
and Hurricanes.


EWTAS has been ready to sell from
the first day of launch. EWTAS and
the theory was marketed actively to
Finnish and Global media companies
at the time national and global media
presented breaking news of
Hurricane Katrina-crisis.


EWTAS went barely noticed from
media leading no following
discovery despite conitnuos activity
to medias.




The reason why product which was
just on need to Katrina-crisis
suffered from unrecognisation is
suspected to because of e.g.
following reasons

a) as totally new perspective it was
difficult to understand fro the point of
view of traditional thinker and a
journalist

b) the marketer was an individual

not an organisation

c) all in all the perspective was
obviously too radical or new to be
effectively absorbed by the

media.


or


1) person came out of the traditional
schemes people have used to work
with showing the inadequacy of the
people who learn the customs and
traditions of the present societies
and can not even think to come out
of their boxes

2) person was an individual not e.g.
many individuals like some journalist
said

3) because the matter was less
interesting than 2 people who had
just drowned which interrupt the
conversation with a one journalist

4) because my matter was not
urgent and they would study it with
all the time God would give like one
person said

5) because I wanted money

and the journalist said I should not
want money if I go to public

6) because I communicated directly
and effectively. It seemed to be the
case I demanded action. This is
outrageous from the point of view of
person who lives in a society where
everything is already known.

7) I denied to lick anyone´s asses



For an inventor and promoter
perspective the inevident byproduct
was to see how our society as a
whole is narrowly observing unit of
life consequently vulnerable to take
the new and surprising events like
natural catastrophes. This initiative
should be thanked as a good test
and feedback why traditional
hierarchy or mechanised and
categorised thinking and structuring
the organisation is easily obsolete
when radical things may appear.


The remedy and the counter-attack
is on the long run raising the
individual value in the societies by
observing and learning the truth and
methods of gathering knowledge
or making science. On short run
sharing responsibility, trust and
power between the individual on a
grass level and managerial
hierarchy must be optimized
favoring unbiased information
walking through as quickly as
possible. Strong and penetrating
individuals must be assemble to the
grass level of the organisations
having authority to bypass the whole
chain of command with a personal
risk of evaluation to report the
unbiased situation report to high
command.


Today we tick among our traditions
and we suffer. If it has to be
explained, my salary comes
because of Your traditions sail too
deep. They must be questionized
but while I expected to normal inertia
to take many year I did not expect
my findings could not be presented
in news as a claim only
consequently my salary would raise
higher while You are so stubborn
and so late.


Here is a question to think about:
How do You think You survive with
the new? By repeating the old
patterns?


Have they work? Let me laugh on
You.


As long as You “learn” and tick
among the big media companies
how Do You think You could ever
survive?


You are waiting in the middle of the
crisis? What are You waiting? To
somebody rescue You?


You are helping Yourself to suffer
from nature and You cannot step
aside. Do no You think there could
be options but to stand by when a
tornado or an earthquake hits?


If You are as late as You obviously
are , do You think it would be a
realistic assumption to wait my work

for Your happiness would become a
beautiful work. A bird whispering
Your ears softly?


I will give You now a chance.
One.

You are going to read this story.
Like it or not.

kirjoitti:

Anonyymi

Kirjoita kommentti

5000

Lähetä