Ekologisesta yleisteoriasta

Tuossa alhaalla "Basix axioms" on jotain selventävää viitaten tuohon "Yleisteoria elämästä" kohtaan.



(www.jannehuttunen.com" sivut ovat
korjauksen alla, joten

Latest updates You can Find also from

http://scientificbreakthrough.blogspot.com/
http://tornadosales.blogspot.com/



Basic axioms

You will learn a one word of science. The axiom.
It refers actually to the
basic principles of doing and building a specific science in question.
Principles, postulates, axioms, corollaries, are about synonyms to describe something long-lasting and verified to build with.

Axioms are pillars of your house. In the
house You can chase the decorations, the carpets or the colors. The experimentation is a fruitful and has direction
when the pillars are built on a lasting ground. If Your experiment makes no result with the pillars You can
try again safely.

The axioms of the Sequential Theory are constructed after many years of
experimenting and research.

I will not say there would never be parallel or rivalling truths, or new truths explaining
things better. However the life we experience in our Globe needs hardly more
complex
pillars than the next four: The Energy (E),The Mass (M), Time (T),
Location/Space(S)

Everyone should be able to follow the logic of
next two premises/paragraphs.

1. Physical appearances of a mass (M) are
color (C), the dimensions; like length, width, and depth i.e. the forms (F) and
weight (W) of the mass.
I.e. M=CFW.

2. One can study every aspect of life empirically(physically proven) with
own senses from the basis of formula
E=T=M/S or alternatively E=T=CFM/S
on which (E) Energy is parallel with (T) Time


Evident to understand the basis of the theory
is to understand the logic coming from the findings
of asynchronic impulse refers something which our linguistics can touchwith verbal ideas like
irregularity or nonlinearity in time.

This “genre” of time is proved to be practical and correct in my studies. I call it Natural Time (NT). I understand for these general concept of markers
which I undrstand best by using phrase like e.g.
“asynchronic impulse”. This I explain on my book, but here is something already.

NT implies the UTC is not practical to too many cases.
While both like all stems from nature´s resources the NT
seems to be more practical not only proven but logical also in a theory as well. NT says simply, the time is not a regular phenomenon at all.

The logic behind comes from directly from nature. The simple essence of gravitation and forms (F) means
our masses in heavens like, the Earth is in its dimension
rather as a “ball” or an “pear” than a “line”.
This we can understand enough because of the gravitation already. Concluding: life gravitates. We as a particles of a life do gravitates around each others. We have magnetism and needs to merge and be together at times, we just do not pass by coldly. While needless to pinpoint, the matter reveals best to have association of sex. Life is coming together and trial of a new compunds.

II

As an example of macrolevel proofs of the existence of a Natural Time (NT) is the asynchronity (from the point of view of us who has amalgamated the UTC to our lives)
. Its presence is apparent and simple to understood:
From geocentric point of view which is correct while we stick here, not so far anywhere else in our cosmos.
This means WYSIWYG-principle. Here what You see is what You get and it has proven to be absolutely right.

Explained a bit here.

From the point of view of the location (S) of the expressor (exprer) and experiencer (exer) the extraterrestial mass forms the natural ecosystem.
This ecosystem does not probably affect on us and not especially measure us and the other life on Earth in a linear fashion, like our UTC makes us easily fooled. If I may say so.
From our viewpoint, which is only meaningful to our lives, The mass (the star) in heavens raises, it reaches its zenith and starts to drop again and for a moments is loosed from our sights. Because if the forms(F) of the masses (M) in our world, in the universe is formed like “balls” and “pears” the time equi8valent the masses gravitaes around us is rather “jumpy” or curvilinear, nonlinear, asynchronic at least.

This is natural and strong fact of the biology of our universe. We do not have to fight against it. We have all of our histories walked with it. Our life´s are volatile and cyclical. From our hearts to our minds and feelings. To the economy and the prices of commodities. It may be good we have UTC to have linearity in such a “mess”.
However on my opinion we could use a parallel wrist watch jmade of “asynchronics” to’ remind, the linearity in our lives are only artificial. We tick naturally in cycles.
This all comes because we live in a big ecosystem which of course does not end to the earrth sphere. The “Theory of A Sequences” works to prove day by day this ecosystem has a meaningful connection to our lives
not only by natural catastrophes but the lesser things, which everywhere proves the contextuality between the masses (M), the energy(E) , the time(T) and the location/Space (M).









III

Below the asynchronity find
are further described and explained what it means in the above axioms, by a
logic we everyone can understood

Asynchronity (is different from) Wrist Watch
T (is different from) UTC
T (is different from) Wrist Watch
T=Asynchronic and Synchronic Time

My conceptualising might be at times difficult to follow. I vote for a “crossculture” of our sciencies. I.e I vote for “chaos” to be essential before You can reassemble and find new patterns of “order”. This method of working results the quality may feel loose. You might try to grab it by old and safe concepts like metaphysical and philosphical. It is not wrong at all. However as You remember NT is an exact measurement. So write
T=NT before You start.

Mr. Janne Huttunen
Sample article re-edited on 3rd November 2005
2168
Äänestä

Muut lukivat myös

Vastaukset 2

Vanhimmat
  • En jaksa ottaa selvää olisiko tuosta jotain hyötyä älyn luonteen ymmärtämiselle ja sitä kautta tekoälyn kehittämiselle, joten sinä voisit kertoa onko ja jos on, niin miltä osin?

    Jos se on muuten vaan fysiikkaa tai systeemiteoriaa, niin en viitsi ruveta tarkistamaan onko se järkevää/totta.

    Äänestä

Kommentoi aloitusta


selvennöksiä kirjoitti:

Tuossa alhaalla "Basix axioms" on jotain selventävää viitaten tuohon "Yleisteoria elämästä" kohtaan.



(www.jannehuttunen.com" sivut ovat
korjauksen alla, joten

Latest updates You can Find also from

http://scientificbreakthrough.blogspot.com/
http://tornadosales.blogspot.com/



Basic axioms

You will learn a one word of science. The axiom.
It refers actually to the
basic principles of doing and building a specific science in question.
Principles, postulates, axioms, corollaries, are about synonyms to describe something long-lasting and verified to build with.

Axioms are pillars of your house. In the
house You can chase the decorations, the carpets or the colors. The experimentation is a fruitful and has direction
when the pillars are built on a lasting ground. If Your experiment makes no result with the pillars You can
try again safely.

The axioms of the Sequential Theory are constructed after many years of
experimenting and research.

I will not say there would never be parallel or rivalling truths, or new truths explaining
things better. However the life we experience in our Globe needs hardly more
complex
pillars than the next four: The Energy (E),The Mass (M), Time (T),
Location/Space(S)

Everyone should be able to follow the logic of
next two premises/paragraphs.

1. Physical appearances of a mass (M) are
color (C), the dimensions; like length, width, and depth i.e. the forms (F) and
weight (W) of the mass.
I.e. M=CFW.

2. One can study every aspect of life empirically(physically proven) with
own senses from the basis of formula
E=T=M/S or alternatively E=T=CFM/S
on which (E) Energy is parallel with (T) Time


Evident to understand the basis of the theory
is to understand the logic coming from the findings
of asynchronic impulse refers something which our linguistics can touchwith verbal ideas like
irregularity or nonlinearity in time.

This “genre” of time is proved to be practical and correct in my studies. I call it Natural Time (NT). I understand for these general concept of markers
which I undrstand best by using phrase like e.g.
“asynchronic impulse”. This I explain on my book, but here is something already.

NT implies the UTC is not practical to too many cases.
While both like all stems from nature´s resources the NT
seems to be more practical not only proven but logical also in a theory as well. NT says simply, the time is not a regular phenomenon at all.

The logic behind comes from directly from nature. The simple essence of gravitation and forms (F) means
our masses in heavens like, the Earth is in its dimension
rather as a “ball” or an “pear” than a “line”.
This we can understand enough because of the gravitation already. Concluding: life gravitates. We as a particles of a life do gravitates around each others. We have magnetism and needs to merge and be together at times, we just do not pass by coldly. While needless to pinpoint, the matter reveals best to have association of sex. Life is coming together and trial of a new compunds.

II

As an example of macrolevel proofs of the existence of a Natural Time (NT) is the asynchronity (from the point of view of us who has amalgamated the UTC to our lives)
. Its presence is apparent and simple to understood:
From geocentric point of view which is correct while we stick here, not so far anywhere else in our cosmos.
This means WYSIWYG-principle. Here what You see is what You get and it has proven to be absolutely right.

Explained a bit here.

From the point of view of the location (S) of the expressor (exprer) and experiencer (exer) the extraterrestial mass forms the natural ecosystem.
This ecosystem does not probably affect on us and not especially measure us and the other life on Earth in a linear fashion, like our UTC makes us easily fooled. If I may say so.
From our viewpoint, which is only meaningful to our lives, The mass (the star) in heavens raises, it reaches its zenith and starts to drop again and for a moments is loosed from our sights. Because if the forms(F) of the masses (M) in our world, in the universe is formed like “balls” and “pears” the time equi8valent the masses gravitaes around us is rather “jumpy” or curvilinear, nonlinear, asynchronic at least.

This is natural and strong fact of the biology of our universe. We do not have to fight against it. We have all of our histories walked with it. Our life´s are volatile and cyclical. From our hearts to our minds and feelings. To the economy and the prices of commodities. It may be good we have UTC to have linearity in such a “mess”.
However on my opinion we could use a parallel wrist watch jmade of “asynchronics” to’ remind, the linearity in our lives are only artificial. We tick naturally in cycles.
This all comes because we live in a big ecosystem which of course does not end to the earrth sphere. The “Theory of A Sequences” works to prove day by day this ecosystem has a meaningful connection to our lives
not only by natural catastrophes but the lesser things, which everywhere proves the contextuality between the masses (M), the energy(E) , the time(T) and the location/Space (M).









III

Below the asynchronity find
are further described and explained what it means in the above axioms, by a
logic we everyone can understood

Asynchronity (is different from) Wrist Watch
T (is different from) UTC
T (is different from) Wrist Watch
T=Asynchronic and Synchronic Time

My conceptualising might be at times difficult to follow. I vote for a “crossculture” of our sciencies. I.e I vote for “chaos” to be essential before You can reassemble and find new patterns of “order”. This method of working results the quality may feel loose. You might try to grab it by old and safe concepts like metaphysical and philosphical. It is not wrong at all. However as You remember NT is an exact measurement. So write
T=NT before You start.

Mr. Janne Huttunen
Sample article re-edited on 3rd November 2005

Anonyymi
5000

Ilmoita asiaton sisältö

  • Sisältää materiaalia, joka on loukkaavaa, herjaavaa, rasistista, uhkailevaa tai ahdistelevaa.

  • Materiaali sisältää nimiä, yhteystietoja tai muita henkilökohtaisia tietoja. Julkisuuden henkilöistä, julkisissa viroissa toimivista ihmisistä sekä yritysten vastuuhenkilöistä saa keskustella työhön liittyen. Myös yksityiselämään liittyvistä asioista voi keskustella siltä osin, kuin niistä on julkisesti kerrottu.

  • Sisältää lapsille haitallista tai heiltä kiellettyä materiaalia. Seksuaalinen sisältö on sallittua aiheeseen tarkoitetuilla palstoilla, joiden ikäraja on 18 vuotta.

  • Lainvastaista sisältöä voi olla mm. yksityiselämää loukkaavan tiedon levitys, kiihottaminen kansanryhmää vastaan, laiton uhkaaminen, alaikäisiin liittyvä seksuaalinen sisältö/grooming, petokset, identiteettivarkaudet, kunnianloukkaukset ja tekijänoikeusrikkomukset.

  • Sisältö ei liity palstan tai keskusteluketjun aiheeseen.

  • Viesti ei ole suomea tai ruotsia (pl. International Forums), se sisältää mainontaa, se sisältää tekijänoikeuksin suojattua materiaalia, se on massapostitus tai jokin muu syy.

Jaa keskustelu