The National Center for Public Research reported:.
In the face of rising unemployment and record-breaking deficits, policy experts at the National Center for Public Policy Research are criticizing the Obama Administration for awarding a half million dollar grant from the economic stimulus package to Penn State Professor Michael Mann, a key figure in the Climategate controversy.
“It’s outrageous that economic stimulus money is being used to support research conducted by Michael Mann at the very time he’s under investigation by Penn State and is one of the key figures in the international Climategate scandal. Penn State should immediately return these funds to the U.S. Treasury,” said Tom Borelli, Ph.D., director of the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project.
Professor Mann is currently under investigation by Penn State University because of activities related to a closed circle of climate scientists who appear to have been engaged in agenda-driven science. Emails and documents mysteriously released from the previously-prestigious Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom revealed discussions of manipulation and destruction of research data, as well as efforts to interfere with the peer review process to stifle opposing views. The motivation underlying these efforts appears to be a coordinated strategy to support the belief that mankind’s activities are causing global warming.
“It’s no wonder that Obama’s stimulus plan is failing to produce jobs. Taxpayer dollars aren’t being used in the ways most likely to spur job creation. The stimulus was not sold to the public as a way to reward a loyalist in the climate change debate. Nor was the stimulus sold as a way to promote the Obama Administration’s position on the global warming theory. This misuse of stimulus money illustrates why tax cuts are a better way to stimulate the economy than letting the government decide where to spend taxpayer dollars. As is often the case, political considerations corrupt the distribution of government funds,” said Deneen Borelli, a fellow with the National Center’s Project 21 black leadership network.
“Mann’s credentials as a climate change alarmist seems to fit the political criteria for stimulus funds sometimes known as ‘Obama money’,” added Deneen Borelli.
Mann is a central and controversial figure in climate change research. Mann’s so-called “hockey stick” graph depicting temperature changes over a 1000 year period was used as evidence in the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2001 report to conclude carbon dioxide from industrial activity is causing global warming. Mimicking the shape of a hockey stick, the graph showed a long period of stable temperatures (the shaft) followed by a rapid rise in temperatures (the blade) during the last hundred years.
Critics of the hockey stick claim Mann manipulated data to eliminate the medieval warming period and the little ice age to eradicate the visual impact of natural global temperature variation. The emails from Climategate reveal that the inner circle of climate scientists were troubled by the methods Mann used to produce the graph.
In the face of rising unemployment and record-breaking deficits, policy experts at the National Center for Public Policy Research are criticizing the Obama Administration for awarding a half million dollar grant from the economic stimulus package to Penn State Professor Michael Mann, a key figure in the Climategate controversy.
“It’s outrageous that economic stimulus money is being used to support research conducted by Michael Mann at the very time he’s under investigation by Penn State and is one of the key figures in the international Climategate scandal. Penn State should immediately return these funds to the U.S. Treasury,” said Tom Borelli, Ph.D., director of the National Center’s Free Enterprise Project.
Professor Mann is currently under investigation by Penn State University because of activities related to a closed circle of climate scientists who appear to have been engaged in agenda-driven science. Emails and documents mysteriously released from the previously-prestigious Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom revealed discussions of manipulation and destruction of research data, as well as efforts to interfere with the peer review process to stifle opposing views. The motivation underlying these efforts appears to be a coordinated strategy to support the belief that mankind’s activities are causing global warming.
“It’s no wonder that Obama’s stimulus plan is failing to produce jobs. Taxpayer dollars aren’t being used in the ways most likely to spur job creation. The stimulus was not sold to the public as a way to reward a loyalist in the climate change debate. Nor was the stimulus sold as a way to promote the Obama Administration’s position on the global warming theory. This misuse of stimulus money illustrates why tax cuts are a better way to stimulate the economy than letting the government decide where to spend taxpayer dollars. As is often the case, political considerations corrupt the distribution of government funds,” said Deneen Borelli, a fellow with the National Center’s Project 21 black leadership network.
“Mann’s credentials as a climate change alarmist seems to fit the political criteria for stimulus funds sometimes known as ‘Obama money’,” added Deneen Borelli.
Mann is a central and controversial figure in climate change research. Mann’s so-called “hockey stick” graph depicting temperature changes over a 1000 year period was used as evidence in the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2001 report to conclude carbon dioxide from industrial activity is causing global warming. Mimicking the shape of a hockey stick, the graph showed a long period of stable temperatures (the shaft) followed by a rapid rise in temperatures (the blade) during the last hundred years.
Critics of the hockey stick claim Mann manipulated data to eliminate the medieval warming period and the little ice age to eradicate the visual impact of natural global temperature variation. The emails from Climategate reveal that the inner circle of climate scientists were troubled by the methods Mann used to produce the graph.
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
Viikinkien aikaan Grönlanti oli sulana. Tämähän merkisti sitä, että Atlantin pohjoisosien merien
suolapitoisuus laimeni.Tällöin kylmä, suolaton vesi, jota virtasi riittäviä määriä sulavasta
suuresta jäämäärästä Golfvirran painumisalueelle, kevensi pintavettä ja esti näin Golfvirran
painumisen alas Pohjois-Atlantilla.Virtaus heikentyi tai pysähtyi sadoiksi vuosiksi. Tästähän
seurasi ns. pieni jääkausi keskiajalla.
Golf-virta on siis pysähtynyt viimeisen jääkauden päättyessä useamman kerran ja sen takia
rauhannobelisti Al Gore on jättänyt aiheen pois ilmastoluennoistaan. Itse asiassa tämä
koko ilmastovouhotus johtui siitä että USA:ssa keskittiin sellainen aihe, jolla saataisiin
Republikaanien valta Valkoisessa talossa loppumaan. Keksittiin ilmastonmuutos-gate,
jossa Professorit Mann ja Jones keksivät "jääkiekkomailan"..jonka avulla saatiin Bushin
hallinto polvilleen...ja Obama voittikin presidentinvaalit juuri tämän "ilmasto-gaten" avulla.
Bush keplotteli itselleen voiton pressanvaaleissa Al Gorelta. Mutta...Al Gore ajatteli,
että hän pistää vielä pahemmaksi ja alkoi saarnata ilmastonmuutoksesta, joka suuntautui
juuri Bushin hallintoa vastaan..kun Bush ei suostunut mihinkään ilmastotalkoisiin..
Koko maailma oli Bushia vastaan terrrosismin vastaisen sotansa vuoksi ja Euroopassakin
vouhotettiin että Bush on itse saatana ja Al Gore pyhimys. Kukaan ei kiinnitänyt huomiota
siihen että Al Gore lavasteli mittaustuloksia omien tausta ryhmiensä avulla.
Al Gore on sijoittanut isoja summia päästökauppaan ja koko itse ajamaansa agendaan.
Jos ilmastosopimus veroineen ja muine tulonsiirtoineen olisi saatu runnottua läpi
Kööpenhaminassa, olisi Al Goresta tullut rikas mies.
..ja heti alkajaiseksi Al Gore jäikin valheesta kiinni Kööpenhaminassa..
http://fortcollinsteaparty.com/index.php/2009/12/15/al-gore-caught-lying-in-copenhagen-admits-error/comment-page-1/
Al Core sai rauhanpalkinnon kun kehitteli suuren "valheen" ilmastonmuutoksesta ja samaten toinen
"dynamiitinkeskijän" palkinnon saaja oli Obama, jolla on parhaillaan kaksi sotaa sodittavana ja
sitten Obama palksitsee "Mannin" siitä kun vie eteenpäin "demokraattien" keskimää ilmastokohua..
varmisti sen, että ei pääse toiselle kaudelle. Valittavissa oli kaksi hevosta Obama valitsi väärin ja kolme vuotta tämä valhe ei enää kanna. Suomessa Taalas kyllä jatkaa eläkeikään saakka, kuin mitään AGW höpötystä ei koskaan olisi ollutkaan.