ympäristön ylikuluttaja uuden tutkimuksen mukaan.
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010440
"Specifically, we aimed to:
(i) provide a rank of proportional environmental impact to determine how countries perform with respect to their available resources,
(ii) provide a rank of total (absolute) resource use to determine which countries have the highest (and lowest) impact at the global scale"
"Environmental impact ranks (proportional and absolute) combine ranks for natural forest lost, habitat conversion, marine captures, fertilizer use, water pollution, carbon emissions and proportion of threatened species"
Molemmilla mittareilla Suomi on samalla tasolla kuin Ruotsi ja melkolailla parhaiden joukossa, jos mukaan ei lueta pieniä saarivaltioita.
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010440
"Specifically, we aimed to:
(i) provide a rank of proportional environmental impact to determine how countries perform with respect to their available resources,
(ii) provide a rank of total (absolute) resource use to determine which countries have the highest (and lowest) impact at the global scale"
"Environmental impact ranks (proportional and absolute) combine ranks for natural forest lost, habitat conversion, marine captures, fertilizer use, water pollution, carbon emissions and proportion of threatened species"
Molemmilla mittareilla Suomi on samalla tasolla kuin Ruotsi ja melkolailla parhaiden joukossa, jos mukaan ei lueta pieniä saarivaltioita.
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.