"130 German Scientists Refute Greenhouse Gas Theory
The respected German engineer, with 130 other sceptic German scientists, co-signed the Open Letter of protest to German Chancellor Angela Merkel (2009). Among other things, these sceptics stated that a 'Growing body of evidence shows anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role' in Earth’s climate.’
The scientists declared that global warming has become a “pseudo religion” and they noted that rising CO2 has “had no measurable effect” on temperatures and also that the “UN IPCC has lost its scientific credibility.”
Thieme, like his esteemed German colleagues, is opposed to the misrepresentation of the basic laws of physics which, it is claimed, contradict the greenhouse gas theory.
Greenhouse Gases No Cause of Thermal Effect
The German analyst argues that within the troposphere no backradiation can be caused by so-called greenhouse gases.Therefore, he argues, it is not at all correct to speak of a thermal effect of these gases on the biosphere.
Read on
* Is Earth's Newly-discovered Second Core a Key Climate Driver?
* The Laws of Physics Ably Defeat the Global Warming Theory
* 'New Scientist' does About Turn on Global Warming
Pointedly, NASA now seems to tacitly agree on this matter; as it no longer shows any more such "backradiation" in its relevant graphic representation of the energy budget of the Earth.
Thus, Thieme and colleagues more confidently assert that the thermal conditions in Earth's and any atmosphere are determined by its pressure and the mass of its main components. Higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2 - at least until they reached 2% (a 60-fold increase) and thus became injurious to health - would endanger neither the climate nor mankind.
Greenhouse Gas Terminology Incorrect
Sceptics like Thieme argue that to avoid further misunderstanding, the terms 'greenhouse effect’ and ‘greenhouse gases’ should be avoided in describing the functioning of the atmosphere as there is no correlation between the affects seen in a greenhouse and that perceived in the atmosphere. He states, “It is completely incomprehensible and unjustified to imagine that mankind can or must protect the climate by attempting to control trace amounts of CO2.”
Sceptics of the greenhouse gas theory insist that the warmer such gases become the more quickly they convey heat away (via convection) from Earth's surface toward space. Thus, we may conclude that all objects above 0 degrees Kelvin radiate; that there is no heat transfer from a cooler body (i.e. Earth’s troposphere) to a warmer body (Earth's surface). Warming by the troposphere is not possible.
References:
Thieme, H., ‘Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics,’ Realplanet.eu; (S. Scott revised translation July 2003 and accessed online: May 24, 2010).
Thieme, H., ‘The Thermodynamic Atmosphere Effect,’ Realplanet.eu; (accessed online: May 24, 2010)
NASA, 'Earth's Radiation Budget Facts, 'Atmospheric Science Data Center;nasa.gov,(Sept. 2007); accessed online May 24, 2010)
Read more at Suite101: Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics http://climatology.suite101.com/article.cfm/greenhouse-gas-hypothesis-violates-fundamentals-of-physics#ixzz0w63kZWym"
The respected German engineer, with 130 other sceptic German scientists, co-signed the Open Letter of protest to German Chancellor Angela Merkel (2009). Among other things, these sceptics stated that a 'Growing body of evidence shows anthropogenic CO2 plays no measurable role' in Earth’s climate.’
The scientists declared that global warming has become a “pseudo religion” and they noted that rising CO2 has “had no measurable effect” on temperatures and also that the “UN IPCC has lost its scientific credibility.”
Thieme, like his esteemed German colleagues, is opposed to the misrepresentation of the basic laws of physics which, it is claimed, contradict the greenhouse gas theory.
Greenhouse Gases No Cause of Thermal Effect
The German analyst argues that within the troposphere no backradiation can be caused by so-called greenhouse gases.Therefore, he argues, it is not at all correct to speak of a thermal effect of these gases on the biosphere.
Read on
* Is Earth's Newly-discovered Second Core a Key Climate Driver?
* The Laws of Physics Ably Defeat the Global Warming Theory
* 'New Scientist' does About Turn on Global Warming
Pointedly, NASA now seems to tacitly agree on this matter; as it no longer shows any more such "backradiation" in its relevant graphic representation of the energy budget of the Earth.
Thus, Thieme and colleagues more confidently assert that the thermal conditions in Earth's and any atmosphere are determined by its pressure and the mass of its main components. Higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2 - at least until they reached 2% (a 60-fold increase) and thus became injurious to health - would endanger neither the climate nor mankind.
Greenhouse Gas Terminology Incorrect
Sceptics like Thieme argue that to avoid further misunderstanding, the terms 'greenhouse effect’ and ‘greenhouse gases’ should be avoided in describing the functioning of the atmosphere as there is no correlation between the affects seen in a greenhouse and that perceived in the atmosphere. He states, “It is completely incomprehensible and unjustified to imagine that mankind can or must protect the climate by attempting to control trace amounts of CO2.”
Sceptics of the greenhouse gas theory insist that the warmer such gases become the more quickly they convey heat away (via convection) from Earth's surface toward space. Thus, we may conclude that all objects above 0 degrees Kelvin radiate; that there is no heat transfer from a cooler body (i.e. Earth’s troposphere) to a warmer body (Earth's surface). Warming by the troposphere is not possible.
References:
Thieme, H., ‘Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics,’ Realplanet.eu; (S. Scott revised translation July 2003 and accessed online: May 24, 2010).
Thieme, H., ‘The Thermodynamic Atmosphere Effect,’ Realplanet.eu; (accessed online: May 24, 2010)
NASA, 'Earth's Radiation Budget Facts, 'Atmospheric Science Data Center;nasa.gov,(Sept. 2007); accessed online May 24, 2010)
Read more at Suite101: Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics http://climatology.suite101.com/article.cfm/greenhouse-gas-hypothesis-violates-fundamentals-of-physics#ixzz0w63kZWym"
Vastaukset 3
Vanhimmat
uppia
Unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful.
tiedemiestä trollasi Merkeliä . Voi voi tämä alkaa kohta käymään Angelalle too embarrasment, kuten Lindzen ennusti jo MOT ohjelmassa viime syksynä.