CRU/UEA ei kehu aikaisempia. Ne puutteet ovat olleet jo tiedossa... * UEA Vice-Chancellor Professor Acton misled the House of Commons Committee over the nature of the Science Appraisal Panel (paragraph 23).
* As Graham Stringer MP, a member of the Committee, has pointed out: “The Oxburgh panel did not do as our predecessor committee had been promised, investigate the science, but only looked at the integrity of the researchers… This leaves a question mark against whether CRU science is reliable.”
* Lord Oxburgh’s Science Appraisal Panel may have not been wholly independent (paragraph 32).
* The review by Lord Oxburgh lacked rigour and diligence (paragraphs 33; 61).
* The Inquiries failed to investigate the serious allegation relating to the deletion of e-mails in response to an FOI request (89).
* None of the inquiries have determined if CRU staff actually contacted the journals they discussed threatening. The alleged threatening of the highly respected journal Geophysical Research Letters, arguably the most important incident in this area, has yet to be examined at all. The committee’s finding in this area is shameful.
“We are now left after three investigations without a clear understanding of whether or not the CRU science is compromised.”
http://thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports/Climategate-Inquiries.pdf
* As Graham Stringer MP, a member of the Committee, has pointed out: “The Oxburgh panel did not do as our predecessor committee had been promised, investigate the science, but only looked at the integrity of the researchers… This leaves a question mark against whether CRU science is reliable.”
* Lord Oxburgh’s Science Appraisal Panel may have not been wholly independent (paragraph 32).
* The review by Lord Oxburgh lacked rigour and diligence (paragraphs 33; 61).
* The Inquiries failed to investigate the serious allegation relating to the deletion of e-mails in response to an FOI request (89).
* None of the inquiries have determined if CRU staff actually contacted the journals they discussed threatening. The alleged threatening of the highly respected journal Geophysical Research Letters, arguably the most important incident in this area, has yet to be examined at all. The committee’s finding in this area is shameful.
“We are now left after three investigations without a clear understanding of whether or not the CRU science is compromised.”
http://thegwpf.org/images/stories/gwpf-reports/Climategate-Inquiries.pdf
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.