yritettiin huomautella jo vuosia sitten mutta ne valheet menivät komeasti läpi.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/feb/04/guardianletters1
"George Monbiot is right in at least one point (The seas rise, the glaciers disappear, January 27): the Indian sub-continent is of vital significance to our global future. Sadly, in seeking to make easy points about global warming he has got his "facts" wrong. Glaciers contribute virtually nothing to the flow of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Indus rivers, which depend primarily on monsoon rain and to a much lesser extent on snow melt (not glacier melt).
Robert W Bradnock
Department of Geography,
School of Oriental and African Studies
[email protected]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2000/feb/04/guardianletters1
"George Monbiot is right in at least one point (The seas rise, the glaciers disappear, January 27): the Indian sub-continent is of vital significance to our global future. Sadly, in seeking to make easy points about global warming he has got his "facts" wrong. Glaciers contribute virtually nothing to the flow of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Indus rivers, which depend primarily on monsoon rain and to a much lesser extent on snow melt (not glacier melt).
Robert W Bradnock
Department of Geography,
School of Oriental and African Studies
[email protected]
Vastaukset 2
Vanhimmat
valheet paljastuvat ja silmukka kiristyy.
Eipä tuo hörhöilysi muuta millään tavalla niitä faktoja, että ilmasto lämpenee ihmiskunnan tupruttelujen takia, jäätiköt sulavat, merenpinta nousee jne.
http://climate.nasa.gov/keyIndicators/
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
http://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
http://ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/ilmastonmuutos/
http://ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/ilmastonmuutoskysymyksia