Liittyy tietysti Durbanin missioon.
Searching for a way out of the non-warming trap, one of the Intergovernmental Panel’s lead science authors announced that the climate computers had always correctly predicted non-warming lulls like ours. (We just missed that clause in the UN’s earlier press releases about the soon-to-be parboiled planet.)
“Looking at a single, noisy 10-year period is cherry picking, and does not provide reliable information about the presence or absence of human effects on climate,” wrote Ben Santer, in the November 17 Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) online. Santer said that “tropospheric temperature records must be at least 17 years long to discriminate between internal climate noise and the signal of human caused changes.”
What’s magic about 17 years instead of 15? From their point of view, it would give the alarmists at least two more years of “grace” before they had to admit the giant computer models are a total failure. That might be enough time to re-elect Obama.
But wait. Horses were about to be changed once more. The next day, November 18th, the IPCC decided not to admit we will have no global warming for the next 30 years. Instead, they announced that the real danger to humanity was not warming at all, but “extreme weather.”
Eli tärkein poitti on että iPCC ei sittenkään myönnä että lämpeneminen on loppunut, vaan julistaa ettei lämpeneminen ollut vaara ihmiskunnalle
lainkaan, vaan todellisena vaarana ovat tulevaisuuden äärimmäiset sääilmiöt.
No tuotahan taalas on toitottanut jo pari päivää ja FMI,n sivuilla ei puhuta
ilmaston lämpenemisestä ja CO2,hdesta mitään.
Eli tälviisii tällä kertaa.
Searching for a way out of the non-warming trap, one of the Intergovernmental Panel’s lead science authors announced that the climate computers had always correctly predicted non-warming lulls like ours. (We just missed that clause in the UN’s earlier press releases about the soon-to-be parboiled planet.)
“Looking at a single, noisy 10-year period is cherry picking, and does not provide reliable information about the presence or absence of human effects on climate,” wrote Ben Santer, in the November 17 Journal of Geophysical Research (Atmospheres) online. Santer said that “tropospheric temperature records must be at least 17 years long to discriminate between internal climate noise and the signal of human caused changes.”
What’s magic about 17 years instead of 15? From their point of view, it would give the alarmists at least two more years of “grace” before they had to admit the giant computer models are a total failure. That might be enough time to re-elect Obama.
But wait. Horses were about to be changed once more. The next day, November 18th, the IPCC decided not to admit we will have no global warming for the next 30 years. Instead, they announced that the real danger to humanity was not warming at all, but “extreme weather.”
Eli tärkein poitti on että iPCC ei sittenkään myönnä että lämpeneminen on loppunut, vaan julistaa ettei lämpeneminen ollut vaara ihmiskunnalle
lainkaan, vaan todellisena vaarana ovat tulevaisuuden äärimmäiset sääilmiöt.
No tuotahan taalas on toitottanut jo pari päivää ja FMI,n sivuilla ei puhuta
ilmaston lämpenemisestä ja CO2,hdesta mitään.
Eli tälviisii tällä kertaa.
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Uppia