Public Submission to all Members of Parliament, January 2012.
Based on Submissions by The Carbon Sense Coalition, Australia, to their Joint Selection Committee on the so-called “Clean Energy Future Legislation”.
Climate Alarmism has clearly peaked and is sliding into oblivion.
Their “science” has collapsed and the public is losing their alarm.
But all the toxic laws passed during the mania now have to be repealed.
That is where the danger now lurks – the danger of complacency and the seductive sirens of the vested interests.
Why the Climate Change Act needs be repealed, urgently.
1. There is no factual evidence that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere controls the climate.
2. There is no factual evidence that the recent gentle warm era is unusual or harmful. There have been warmer periods in the past and all have encouraged a profusion of human, animal and plant life.
3. There is no factual evidence that carbon dioxide has the ability to produce heat by itself, instead it takes its temperature from its surroundings, just like the rest of the atmosphere. It does not burn like carbon, coal or wood – it is a harmless gaseous by-product of burning these fuels and the human contribution to the atmospheric carbon dioxide content is at most only three percent, according to UN IPCC literature.
4. There is factual evidence that solar cycles have a notable effect on global temperatures and rainfall. The sun, the clouds, the oceans, volcanic dust and the winds create our climate with its cycles, seasons, tides, unpredictable variations and regular extremes.
5. There is factual evidence that ocean temperatures influence global temperatures and with it the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere via the absorption and emission of this soluble gas from the vast oceans that cover more than two thirds of our planet.
6. The computerised climate models promoted by the UN IPCC, WMO and the UEA have never made successful predictions and there is no reason to believe they will ever mimic the complexity of the factors affecting climate.
7. There is no consensus on the science supporting the alarmist climate models. A large and growing group of scientists from around the world, with relevant and pertinent knowledge or experience, is actively reviewing and challenging the alarmist models. They are growing in numbers and will not go away.
.........
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/hans-schreuder-submission-to-parliament-commended-by-ruth-lea/#more-4284
Based on Submissions by The Carbon Sense Coalition, Australia, to their Joint Selection Committee on the so-called “Clean Energy Future Legislation”.
Climate Alarmism has clearly peaked and is sliding into oblivion.
Their “science” has collapsed and the public is losing their alarm.
But all the toxic laws passed during the mania now have to be repealed.
That is where the danger now lurks – the danger of complacency and the seductive sirens of the vested interests.
Why the Climate Change Act needs be repealed, urgently.
1. There is no factual evidence that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere controls the climate.
2. There is no factual evidence that the recent gentle warm era is unusual or harmful. There have been warmer periods in the past and all have encouraged a profusion of human, animal and plant life.
3. There is no factual evidence that carbon dioxide has the ability to produce heat by itself, instead it takes its temperature from its surroundings, just like the rest of the atmosphere. It does not burn like carbon, coal or wood – it is a harmless gaseous by-product of burning these fuels and the human contribution to the atmospheric carbon dioxide content is at most only three percent, according to UN IPCC literature.
4. There is factual evidence that solar cycles have a notable effect on global temperatures and rainfall. The sun, the clouds, the oceans, volcanic dust and the winds create our climate with its cycles, seasons, tides, unpredictable variations and regular extremes.
5. There is factual evidence that ocean temperatures influence global temperatures and with it the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere via the absorption and emission of this soluble gas from the vast oceans that cover more than two thirds of our planet.
6. The computerised climate models promoted by the UN IPCC, WMO and the UEA have never made successful predictions and there is no reason to believe they will ever mimic the complexity of the factors affecting climate.
7. There is no consensus on the science supporting the alarmist climate models. A large and growing group of scientists from around the world, with relevant and pertinent knowledge or experience, is actively reviewing and challenging the alarmist models. They are growing in numbers and will not go away.
.........
http://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/hans-schreuder-submission-to-parliament-commended-by-ruth-lea/#more-4284
Vastaukset 1
Vanhimmat
Anna sitten tieteellinen todiste ihmisen aiheuttamasta ilmaston lämpenemisestä.
Vai eikö sellaista ole olemassa?