Mistä "uusiutuvassa on kyse, lyhyt esitys.
"Designed to create a renewable energy trading market, EPAct -- much of which took effect in 1997 -- created a combination of mandates, incentives, and tax credits. These included:
* laws requiring large wind producers to be allowed to tie into the existing utility grid
* "Renewable Portfolio Standards" forcing utilities to buy intermittent wind generated electricity.
* "Renewable Energy Certificates" tradable separately from the electricity itself to sell to companies needing to meet the portfolio standards.
* A 10-year "Production Tax Credit" that now equals $.019/kWh
* Accelerated depreciation allowing tax write-off using an accelerated 5-year double-declining-balance method (40% per year).
Wind capacity had stagnated through the mid-1990s. But Enron in January, 1997 bought out Tehachapi-based industry leader Zond Corporation - launching the second California Wind Rush.
Four years later, Enron would implode. The company which gamed a government-crippled artificial marketplace was deconstructed as poster boy for unbridled capitalism.
But the tax credits, mandates, and regulations which made Enron possible did not die with it. Enron Wind's turbine manufacturing subsidiary was purchased by General Electric. Many of its wind farms went to Florida Light and Power. By 2009, the US Department of Energy estimates mandate-and-subsidy-driven wind capacity would rise to 28,635mw. "
"In early 2009 the Socialist government of Spain reduced alternative energy subsidies by 30%. Calzada continues:
"At that point the whole pyramid collapsed. They are firing thousands of people. BP closed down the two largest solar production plants in Europe. They are firing between 25,000 and 40,000 people...."
"What do we do with all this industry that we have been creating with subsidies that now is collapsing? The bubble is too big. We cannot continue pumping enough money. ...The President of the Renewable Industry in Spain (wrote a column arguing that) ...the only way is finding other countries that will give taxpayers' money away to our industry to take it and continue maintaining these jobs."
Mutta kun liikkeellä on kaikenmaailman edusaajaa, maksettua taputtajaa
perässähiihtäjää, sekä hyväuskoista hölmöä, sekä peelo petteriä sekä ympäristöaktivistijärjestöä..
Tajuaakohan edes kukaan niistä mikä rooli on niille kullekkin on varattu,
eli mitä roolia esittävät.
Tästä johtuu että Fingrid alkaa polttamaan omistajansa näppejä, koska
siihen on kytketty aikapommi joka laukeaa kun paljastuu että sen pitää liittää tuulirupellit ja Sokean Reetan navetanseinä syöttämään valtakunnanverkkoa
ilmaisella ekosähköllä, ja rakentaa myös sähköverkko uudelleen, kuluttajien kustannuksella, joka johtaisi jälleen sähkölaskujen moninkertaistumiseen, ja Fortumille tuli pupu pöksyyn, joten se mieluusti antaisi vahingon kiertää..
Ja nyt ollaan siinä tilanteessa, etteivät tiiä mikä niihin iski, moista pöljyyttä.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/wind_energys_ghosts_1.html
"Designed to create a renewable energy trading market, EPAct -- much of which took effect in 1997 -- created a combination of mandates, incentives, and tax credits. These included:
* laws requiring large wind producers to be allowed to tie into the existing utility grid
* "Renewable Portfolio Standards" forcing utilities to buy intermittent wind generated electricity.
* "Renewable Energy Certificates" tradable separately from the electricity itself to sell to companies needing to meet the portfolio standards.
* A 10-year "Production Tax Credit" that now equals $.019/kWh
* Accelerated depreciation allowing tax write-off using an accelerated 5-year double-declining-balance method (40% per year).
Wind capacity had stagnated through the mid-1990s. But Enron in January, 1997 bought out Tehachapi-based industry leader Zond Corporation - launching the second California Wind Rush.
Four years later, Enron would implode. The company which gamed a government-crippled artificial marketplace was deconstructed as poster boy for unbridled capitalism.
But the tax credits, mandates, and regulations which made Enron possible did not die with it. Enron Wind's turbine manufacturing subsidiary was purchased by General Electric. Many of its wind farms went to Florida Light and Power. By 2009, the US Department of Energy estimates mandate-and-subsidy-driven wind capacity would rise to 28,635mw. "
"In early 2009 the Socialist government of Spain reduced alternative energy subsidies by 30%. Calzada continues:
"At that point the whole pyramid collapsed. They are firing thousands of people. BP closed down the two largest solar production plants in Europe. They are firing between 25,000 and 40,000 people...."
"What do we do with all this industry that we have been creating with subsidies that now is collapsing? The bubble is too big. We cannot continue pumping enough money. ...The President of the Renewable Industry in Spain (wrote a column arguing that) ...the only way is finding other countries that will give taxpayers' money away to our industry to take it and continue maintaining these jobs."
Mutta kun liikkeellä on kaikenmaailman edusaajaa, maksettua taputtajaa
perässähiihtäjää, sekä hyväuskoista hölmöä, sekä peelo petteriä sekä ympäristöaktivistijärjestöä..
Tajuaakohan edes kukaan niistä mikä rooli on niille kullekkin on varattu,
eli mitä roolia esittävät.
Tästä johtuu että Fingrid alkaa polttamaan omistajansa näppejä, koska
siihen on kytketty aikapommi joka laukeaa kun paljastuu että sen pitää liittää tuulirupellit ja Sokean Reetan navetanseinä syöttämään valtakunnanverkkoa
ilmaisella ekosähköllä, ja rakentaa myös sähköverkko uudelleen, kuluttajien kustannuksella, joka johtaisi jälleen sähkölaskujen moninkertaistumiseen, ja Fortumille tuli pupu pöksyyn, joten se mieluusti antaisi vahingon kiertää..
Ja nyt ollaan siinä tilanteessa, etteivät tiiä mikä niihin iski, moista pöljyyttä.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/wind_energys_ghosts_1.html
Vastaukset
Vanhimmat
Ei vielä vastauksia
Aloittaja odottaa vastauksia. Kerro oma näkemyksesi ensimmäisenä.