Kysymys on röyhkeydestä

Sinun tapauksessasi on kysymys tyhmyydestä ja idioottimaisesta salaliittohörhöilystä ja alkoholismista ja mielisairaudesta.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/What-do-the-hacked-CRU-emails-tell-us.html

"
What do the suggestive "tricks" and "hiding the decline" mean? Is this evidence of a nefarious climate conspiracy? "Mike's Nature trick" refers to the paper Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries (Mann 1998), published in Nature by lead author Michael Mann. The "trick" is the technique of plotting recent instrumental data along with the reconstructed data. This places recent global warming trends in the context of temperature changes over longer time scales.

The "decline" refers to the "divergence problem". This is where tree ring proxies diverge from modern instrumental temperature records after 1960. The divergence problem is discussed as early as 1998, suggesting a change in the sensitivity of tree growth to temperature in recent decades (Briffa 1998). It is also examined more recently in Wilmking 2008 which explores techniques in eliminating the divergence problem. So when you look at Phil Jone's email in the context of the science discussed, it is not the schemings of a climate conspiracy but technical discussions of data handling techniques available in the peer reviewed literature.
"

Jos joku hörhö on kykenemätön ymmärtämään tuota ulkomaan kielistä tekstiä, niin kannattaisi lopettaa aivoton hörhöily ihan kokonaan.