Systemaattisia poistoja HadCrut lämpötiladastasta paljastunut.

Ja päätelmät perään.
Viitti kääntää kun joku muu saa kääntää, olen mielestäni tehnyt oman pienen osani.
Conclusion

I asked to begin with:
Homogenisation or Pasteurisation (warm treatment) ?

To answer this, consider:

Is it likely that all French temperature stations fails?

Is it likely that all French temperature stations even fails simultaneously 1989-1993?

Is it likely that all French temperature stations then happens to fail in the same way creating a top 1989-1993 all of very similar shape and size?

Is it likely that such a random but simultaneous and similar error-warm-peak across France has the same shape as the 1989-1991 warm peak that can be traced all the way from Algeria to Murmansk?

On top of this, - is it likely that this nation wide thermometer-failing happens simultaneously with data drop out in Spain and Portugal?

And is it likely that we have the same situation for the area with the Austrian warm peak for the years 1993-5?
Where almost all data across Southern Germany has a data drop out just when the Austrian peak occurs 1993-95?
And all across central Europe and Balkan thermometers according to Hadcrut have measured a significant warm peak with similar shape and size and timing 1993-95 by random mistake?

And that we see the exact same situation other places in the world? (ex: RUTI Mozambique).


To the above I have to say: “No”.

It seems that corrections supposed to be "homogenization" has nothing to do with a scientifically correct homogenization procedure.

For now I have not managed to explain a scientific justifiable reason for the corrections reflected by the Hadcrut data and the missing data in GHCN in the present article.


More: See “RUTI multi level adjustments”.
Oikea teurastaja, joku taas esiintyy minuna, sen erottaa käsialasta.